Brendon Knapp, Edmund Sannda, Carlton Allred, Kyle Upton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Title Here IEEE UCSD Overview Robo-Magellan is a robotics competition emphasizing autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance over varied, outdoor.
Advertisements

Bad News Bots E2 Ryan Bove Kara Collins Peter Courtney Kyle O’Reilly Benjamin Rowland Concept Design Review.
Team Spot Cooperative Light Finding Robots A Robotics Academy Project Louise Flannery, Laurel Hesch, Emily Mower, and Adeline Sutphen Under the direction.
ROFI – Next Generation – DAREL By Mike Pluma. Objectives For New Design: – Main objective: move toward Dynamic Balance Raise center of gravity by moving.
The Micro-CART project will develop a fully autonomous UAV for the 2007 International Aerial Robotics Competition. The industry-sponsored project is funded.
P11213: Modular Student Attachment to the Land Vehicle for Education Jared Wolff, Andrew Komendat, Oyetunde Jolaoye, Dylan Rider.
The Pied Pipers Alyssa Visitacion Ken Shum Joanne Flores.
Wheelesley : A Robotic Wheelchair System: Indoor Navigation and User Interface Holly A. Yanco Woo Hyun Soo DESC Lab.
The Gaze Controlled Robotic Platform creates a sensor system using a webcam. A specialized robot built upon the Arduino platform responds to the webcam.
CSE Design Lab – Milestone 2 James Hopkins Dave Festa Dennis O’Flaherty Karl Schwirz.
ECE415 SDP Design MAPPER: A Perfectly Portable Exploration Robot Rohan Balakrishnan (CSE) Conan Jen (EE) Andrew Lok (EE) Jonathan Tang (EE)
Autonomous Vehicle: Navigation by a Line Created By: Noam Brown and Amir Meiri Mentor: Johanan Erez and Ronel Veksler Location: Mayer Building (Electrical.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Tracking Gökhan Tekkaya Gürkan Vural Can Eroğul. Outline Tracking –Overview –Head Tracking –Eye Tracking –Finger/Hand Tracking Demos.
Autonomous Dual Navigation System Vehicle Dmitriy Bekker Sergei Kunsevich Computer Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology December 1, 2005 Advisor:
EE 296 TEAM “DA KINE” MICROMOUSE PROJECT PROPOSAL Team members: Software Group - Henry, James Roles : tracking, mapping, guidance, interface Hardware Group.
Team Migliore Controls and Interface Presented by: Matt Burkhardt Brendan Crotty.
Conference Room Laser Pointer System Anna Goncharova, Brent Hoover, Alex MendesSponsored by Dr. Jeffrey Black Overview The project concept was developed.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
June 12, 2001 Jeong-Su Han An Autonomous Vehicle for People with Motor Disabilities by G. Bourhis, O.Horn, O.Habert and A. Pruski Paper Review.
Intelligent Vehicles and Systems Group The Pennsylvania State University 1/9 EDSGN 100 EDSGN 100 Autonomous System Navigation and Driver Augmentation Pramod.
Abstract Design Considerations and Future Plans In this project we focus on integrating sensors into a small electrical vehicle to enable it to navigate.
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
UBSwarm: Design of a Software Environment to Deploy Multiple Decentralized Robots Tamer Abukhalil, Madhav Patil, Advisor: Prof. Tarek Sobh Robotics, Intelligent.
Team HazardHawk Team HazardHawk 2008 April 24, 2008.
Development of Control for Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASV) Co-Leaders: Forrest Walen, Justyn Sterritt Team Members: Andrea Dargie, Paul Willis,
Team 01 : QuadSquad Patent Liability Analysis Camille Chang 10/30/2013 the ECE quadcopter senior design Purdue University1.
Coverage Efficiency in Autonomous Robots With Emphasis on Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Mo Lu Computer Systems Lab Final Version.
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
David Gitz, EE, ICARUS Lead Engineer Senior Design.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Autonomous Robot Project Lauren Mitchell Ashley Francis.
Team: Justin Audley, Blake Brown, Christopher Dean, Andrew Russell, Andrew Saunders Advisor: Dr. Richard A. Messner Sponsors: Dr. Richard A. Messner, UNH.
Administrative Introduction Our goals for this project are for the three robots to work together intelligently to complete a maze faster than an individual.
FAST: Fully Autonomous Sentry Turret
Can architecture descriptions help prospective users to visualise the solution in terms of meeting its requirements? Peter Henderson Open Middleware Infrastructure.
Smart Shopping Cart The shopping cart of the future Nicole Berkovich and Ian O’Leary.
Hardware Sponsors National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Butler Bot Sai Srivatsava Vemu Graduate Student Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
ECE 480 Design Team 1 Autonomous Docking of NASA Robotic Arm.
Tapia Robotics 2009: Import Antigravity Kate Burgers '11, Becky Green '11, Sabreen Lakhani '11, Pam Strom '11 and Zachary Dodds In the summer of 2008,
Roaming Security Robot Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.
1 SDP09 Team Siqueira Rohan Balakrishnan (CSE) Conan Jen (EE) Andrew Lok (EE) Jonathan Tang (EE) MAPPER: A Perfectly Portable Exploration Robot.
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
ECE477 Senior Design Android street car Team 12 Libo Dong 1.
Robot Project by Ahmad Shtaiyat Supervised by Dr. Salem Al-Agtash.
Accessible Aerial Autonomy via ROS Nick Berezny ’12, Lilian de Greef ‘12, Brad Jensen ‘13, Kimberly Sheely ‘12, Malen Sok ‘13, and Zachary Dodds Tasks.
UNH FIREFIGHTING ROBOT Ryan Morin, Craig Shurtleff, Andrew Levenbaum, Stephen Tobin, and Liam O’Connor University of New Hampshire: College of Engineering.
Xinguo Yu, Lvzhou Gao, Bin He, Xiaowei Shao May 20, 2017
The JAviator Project Rainer Trummer Computer Sciences Workshop '06
Group 3 Corey Jamison, Joel Keeling, & Mark Langen
Computer-Aided Design
Adaptive Home Automation System
Automation as the Subject of Mechanical Engineer’s interest
PAX River Competition UK Aerial Robotics Team University of Kentucky.
James Donahue EE 444 Fall LiDAR James Donahue EE 444 Fall
P07521 BRDF Imaging Platform
Flying Universal Gripper
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
EET2530 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Bluetooth operated Arduino Controlled Car
Definition & Description:
Scanners – Robots – Measurement Plans Synergy in Motion
TOPIC: Computer-Aided Design
Rudra Timsina Micah Lucas Marc Salas Advisor: Richard Messner
Midway Design Review Team 16 December 6,
Comprehensive Design Review
GPS Navigation System ET Spring 2018
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Brendon Knapp, Edmund Sannda, Carlton Allred, Kyle Upton PROJECT MUNINN Autonomous 3D Mapping Drone University of North Texas, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Brendon Knapp, Edmund Sannda, Carlton Allred, Kyle Upton Client: Jim Buchanan BECK TECK DESIGN VISION COMPONENTS The goal of Project Muninn is to develop an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle that is capable of autonomously navigating and generating 3D images of an indoor space. Such a device has potential applications in various fields such as commercial surveying, geographic surveying, real estate, architectural design and national defense. We modified the A.R. Parrot 2.0 drone with ultrasonic sensors to aid in autonomous navigation. The LIDAR- Lite v2 laser range finder was attached to a servo mechanism allowing the sensor to capture distinct values in three-dimensional space. Using Node.js software, the sensor data is sent to the computer to control the drone and generate a 3D object file. To make the autonomous navigation function, we used ultrasonic ping sensors to determine the drones proximity to a wall. The drone will orient itself to a wall and follow it until it reaches a corner. From here the drone rotates itself 90 degrees, it scans the area then continues traversing the perimeter of the room. The user can initiate or deactivate the drone via our proprietary Graphical User Interface. Our project takes laser and ultrasonic sensors and pairs it with custom software to produce a fully autonomous 3D mapping drone. Lidar-Lite v2 Arduino 101 3x HC-SR04 Ultrasonic AR Drone 2.0  79P-Tiny-Cam-PTZ-9G SYSTEM INTEGRATION DESIGN DIAGRAMS The LIDAR Lite V2 is attached to the 79P-Tiny-Cam-PTZ-9G pan-tile servo Three ultrasonic sensors are attached at 90 degrees on the left, right and forward facing positions. TESTING Weight tests were necessary to ensure the drone could lift the attached components. The max carrying weight of the drone is roughly100 grams, and our initial component tests totaled 94 grams. After design modifications using the available hardware, the total weight ultimately exceeded the drone weight limit. Software was modified to adequately map out the coordinates of a room. This proved possible, however there is slight variance due to the hovering of the drone and the movement of the servo as it scans. This can be corrected by determining the varied x, y, and z position between each sensor poll. We had to mount the ultrasonic sensors in a position that would optimize the autonomy of the drone. We took into considering placing them at a 90° angle and placing them at a 45°. The 90° angle proved to be more successful because it allows the drone to orient itself using the corners of the room. To ensure stability, we mounted the LIDAR/Servo mechanism underneath, and as close to the center of the drone as possible. We needed to extend the landing legs of the drone to accommodate this module. Prototype: Muninn 1.0 RESULTS GOING FORWARD THE TEAM Future Development of Muninn will be in upgrades to issues in the drone battery life, motor strength, and accuracy. We were able to use the ultrasonic sensors to generate 3D images, allowing us to reduce weight at the expense of accuracy.