Status of KAGRA detector characterization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
Advertisements

G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
Stefan Hild 1LSC/Virgo meeting, Baton Rouge, March 2007 Method for a safe statistical veto using IFO channels Stefan Hild (AEI Hannover) LSC/Virgo meeting,
GWDAW-10 (December 14, 2005, University of Texas at Brownsville, U.S.A.) Data conditioning and veto for TAMA burst analysis Masaki Ando and Koji Ishidoshiro.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector Hiroshima U. NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 3rd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector TITECH NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 2nd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through Multi-messenger.
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
Results from TOBAs Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Korean Group 12 th KAGRA face-to-face Meeting August 28, 2015 on behalf Korean Gravitational Wave Group 1.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Martin Hewitson Overview of DC work. GEO DC workshop June DC work Noise characterisation Noise projections, noise sources, noise couplings Calibration.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
Detector Characterisation and Optimisation David Robertson University of Glasgow.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
LIGO-G Z March 21, 2007 March 2007 LIGO/Virgo Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Cataloguing Keith Thorne for the Spectral Line Working Group.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo May 9, 2016JGW-T
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Development of KAGRA Burst Pipeline
KAGRA Detector Characterization
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Kazuhiro Yamamoto on behalf of KAGRA collaboration
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
Methods and Milestones
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Detector Characterization
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
Coherent detection and reconstruction
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Bounding the strength of a Stochastic GW Background in LIGO’s S3 Data
Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda M. Ando, K. Okada,
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Hardware Injections in S4
S2 Inspiral Hardware Injections
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Progress Report: Noise Storms and Beam Splitter Oscillations
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report)
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Upper limits on gravitational wave bursts
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

Status of KAGRA detector characterization Kazuhiro Hayama (ICRR) On behalf of KAGRA collaboration

Interface

Scope For Detector side Development of characterization tools Daily summary monitor Monitoring Environment around KAGRA For Data analysis side Data quality information Veto analysis

Tools for Detector Characterization

DetChar Tools Non-Stationarity Correlation Line Gaussianity Glitch Monitor Line Finder Line Tracking Line Removal Rayleigh Monitor Non-Gaussianity Monitor RMS Monitor Noise Floor Monitor Time-Series Monitor Spectrum Monitor Spectrogram Monitor Sensitivity Monitor Range Monitor Inspiral Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown Ringdown Stochastic Coherence Finder Multiple-channel coherence finder (BruCo) Pearson correlation Finder NonLinear correlation Finder Realtime Quick look webpage Daily summary webpage GUI Interface Web-Base Interface Command-line Interface Health monitor File Finder (New) Globally Correlated magnetic noise Violin mode Multi-channel analysis Newtonian noise Effect of water inside the mountain Line Gaussianity T.Yamamoto+ PRD (2016) User Interface Time-Series Spectrum System Health GW Range

Example : GW150914 Data Characterization around GW150914 Glitch pipeline BLRMS (60~70Hz) Seen the signal clearly Amp. of Power line(60Hz) fluctuated ~+-5E-21 Amp. of 500Hz line decreasing >100Hz, Gaussianity pretty good <100Hz, non-Gaussian 516Gz line: strange behavior. Hayama Yuzurihara Non-Gaussianity Line Tracking Yamamoto Ueno

Daily Summary Monitors in iKAGRA

Duty Cycle(Mar.25-Mar.31,2016)

Inspiral Range

Duty cycle(April11-April25,2016)

Lock Duration(April11-April25)

Inspiral Range

Differential of the X and Y arms During March test run, lock lost every 30min because feedback signals were saturated. We need more actuator range How large? 1day plot (March30-31)

Tidal Distortion(Mar.25-Mar.31) Preliminary Nagano, Araya, Hayama

Tidal Distortion(April11-April25) Preliminary Nagano, Araya, Hayama

Environmental Monitors in iKAGRA Seismoneters at Center, X-end,Y-end

Earthquake at Kumamoto A. Shoda (NAOJ)

Gravity Gradient Noise Produced by Water Hayama, Shikano, Kataoka, Furuta, Uchiyama, Somiya, Shoda, Miyoki, Ohashi, Saito Water flow generates gravity gradient noise Since the KAGRA site has large amount of water flow, we need to estimate the gravity gradient noise due to the water flow Right before the April test run, we started to measure the water flow.

KAGRA Water Flow

Y. Shikano (IMS)

Schedule for Environmental Monitors

KGWG DetChar Activities in KAGRA John Oh on behalf of KGWG detchar group - Channel Safety Study of iKAGRA Data * Using H/W Injection signal, unsafe channels (strongly involved to GW channels) should be identified by timing coincidence, significance, and correlation index - Omicron Trigger Generation of iKAGRA Data - EtaGen Trigger Generation of iKAGRA Data - Glitch Classification of iKAGRA Data using Artificial Neural Networks - Nonlinear correlated glitch trigger study by MIC

Young-Min Kim (SNU)

Safe Channel Study Young-Min Kim (SNU)

E. Son (NIMS)

END

Channel ↔ Audio Transform