Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Proposed Regulatory Framework for Wastewater Presented by Claude Fortin Winnipeg, Manitoba December 6, 2007.
Evaluation of VOC Definition Based on Vapor Pressure
1 The Aerosol Coatings Reactivity-Based Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
1. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholders - Webinar Session January 14 th, 2014.
Developing a Harmonized Pesticide Classification System Work undertaken by the Federal/ Provincial/ Territorial Committee on Pest Management and Pesticides.
UNCLASSIFIED Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Victorian Energy Efficiency Target Forum 16 April 2015 Village Roadshow.
Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and Radiation Management Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Proposed.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
Update on Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) CEC – Public Meeting of the NAPRTR Project November 11, 2014 Karen Mailhiot Environment.
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
SCHC, 9/27/2005 US Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System The GHS Journey Continues…
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
1 Proposed California Low Emissions and Reactivity (CLEAR) Regulation For Aerosol Coating Products Meeting of the Reactivity Scientific Advisory Committee.
Proposed Amendments to Enhanced Vapor Recovery Regulations November 18, 2004 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Air Resources Board California Environmental.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
VOC Directive 1999/13/EC: The German Approach to Simplification of the Reduction Scheme: Simplified Verification of Compliance Contents: Simplified Verification.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
1. Particulate Matter (Air Pollutants) Webinar presentation January 9, 2014 Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Environmental Stewardship Branch.
Emissions Solutions Al Gray Technical Communicator Cashman Equipment.
1. Stationary and Area Sources Committee Recommendations OTC Annual Meeting 2010 Baltimore, MD 2.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Amendments to Rule 442, Architectural Coatings Kevin J. Williams, Ph.D. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District October 12, 2015.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Mobile Sources Chapter 11 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
EPA’s White Paper and Workshop on Background Ozone NASA AQAST 10 th Semiannual Meeting – 1/6/16.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
September California Air Resource Board Background  Lead air pollution regulatory agency in California  Responsibilities include:  Vehicle emissions.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Clean Air Act Glossary.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Marcel van Kints United Nations Statistics Division/DESA
What Causes Air Pollution? Primary and Secondary Pollutants History of Air Pollution Motor Vehicle Emissions Industrial Air Pollution.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
RCMA Government Affairs Committee UPDATE
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Assessment and verification
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
VOC Content: Regulating Beyond What Can Be Measured?
Assessment and verification
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
North American Emission Control Area
Overview of Canada’s Air Quality Activities
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMANTAL AND NATURE PROTECTION
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Introduction to HPMP.
Surveys on ODS alternatives
Architectural Coatings Update to Suggested Control Measure
Presentation transcript:

Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association August 25, 2005

Drivers for taking action on Volatile Organic Compounds Science VOCs are precursors to the formation of particulate matter and ground-level ozone, ie: smog Policy Canada-wide Standards (CWS) for Particulate Matter and Ozone (2000) Canada-U.S. Ozone Annex (2000) Government of Canada’s Interim Plan 2001 on Particulate Matter and Ozone (2001) VOCs added to Schedule 1 – List of Toxic Substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) (2003)

Many consumer/commercial products contain such solvents Consumer and commercial products are a significant source of VOC emissions …. Solvent use is replacing transportation as largest anthropogenic VOC source in most areas of Canada 2nd largest in 2000; Projected to at least equal by 2010 Many consumer/commercial products contain such solvents cleaners, paints, adhesives, coatings, inks

Development of Federal Agenda Background information was collected through consultant studies and industry input Multi-stakeholder consultation was held in March 2003 Published as a Notice of Intent in Canada Gazette, Part I on March 27, 2004 Federal Agenda on the Reduction of VOCs from Consumer and Commercial Products

The Federal Agenda is a descriptive Action Plan Objective: Reduce VOC emissions in Canada by reducing the VOC content of consumer and commercial products Timeline: Overall program from 2004 through to 2010 Elements: Identifies measures to be taken Describes implementation approach Schedule / timelines for implementation

Key Considerations when the Agenda was developed Provinces support federal leadership on product standards Listing of VOCs on CEPA Schedule 1 allows regulatory approach U.S. measures will be point of reference U.S. EPA Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) California Air Resource Board (CARB)

U.S. jurisdictions have been taking action on VOCs in Consumer Products U.S. EPA promulgated three rules in 1998 for consumer products, AIM coatings and auto refinish coatings Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) has model rules in place and plan to review in 2006 California Air Resource Board (CARB) has the longest history of developing VOC rules and is currently working on further reductions

Definition of Volatile Organic Compound VOC is any volatile organic compound that participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions, excluding the following: ... exclusion list includes 44 compounds or groups of compounds such as methane, ethane, acetone, dichloromethane, methyl chloroform, PCBTF and various CFCs, HCFCs and HFCs also excludes by definition carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates and ammonium carbonate

Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings AIM coatings are: applied to stationary structures, portable buildings, pavement and curbs at site of installation AIM coatings are NOT: applied in shop environments or to non-stationary structures (airplanes, ships, automobiles) adhesives

Activities to Date – AIM Coatings 2003 survey of AIM manufacturers and importers Collection of information on current products, sales and VOC content 2004 Background Technical Study March 2005 Discussion Document Outlines proposed elements for regulating VOC content of AIM coatings April 2005 Consultation Meeting Initial consultation with stakeholders to present proposal and receive feedback Additional consultations to be undertaken

Intent of the AIM Coating Proposal Mandatory VOC content limits on all AIM coatings sold in Canada Would apply to manufacturers, importers and retailers of AIM coatings

50 categories of AIM coatings are proposed Proposed Categories 50 categories of AIM coatings are proposed Categories classify coatings according to: measurable characteristics chemical composition/type of coating recommended use

Selection of Coating Category Coatings classified into those categories that best describe use/characteristics In the event that a coating is recommended for use in more than one category, category with the lowest VOC content limit is the one which would apply If coatings cannot be described by any other definition, they are classified as flat or non-flat coatings

Proposed VOC Content Limits Proposed VOC content limits were selected based on available background information 48 of 50 proposed content limits are consistent with the OTC Model Rule (other two consistent with US EPA National rule) OTC limits are considered most relevant since they have been most recently developed and are currently in use in the US

Calculation of VOC Content Proposed VOC content limits are intended to apply at the point of application of the coating VOC content should account for recommended thinners VOCs contained in colourants added to tint bases are not included

Calculation of VOC Content – cont. The VOC content limits are expressed as “grams of VOC per litre of coating, excluding the volume of any water and exempt compounds” Calculations used to determine the VOC content are consistent with those in the US EPA National Rule, the OTC Model Rule and CARB Suggested Control Measure.

Proposed Test Methods The proposed reference method to determine coating is the US EPA Method 24, US Code of Federal Register, Part 60 Manufacturers may use Method 24, formulation data or other means of determining the VOC content In the case of inconsistencies, the Method 24 test results would be used to determine compliance

Proposed Small Container Exemption Exempts coatings sold in containers smaller than 1 US quart (0.946 L) This exemption also affects several categories in the AIM regulation that have significant portions of sales in small containers

Proposed Reporting/Labelling Requirements Manufacturers and importers may be required to maintain information on the VOC content of their products The regulations could contain requirements to include the date of manufacture, thinning requirements and VOC content of the coating on the label Other labelling requirements could require specific descriptions to identify the recommended use for the coating

Reactivity What is NOT included… currently being assessed by US EPA and CARB as a basis for VOC control programs Not being considered for use in an AIM coatings regulation since: Development of reactivity based regulation would take a significant amount of time and will not afford the necessary short term VOC reductions required

Complying Marketshare Survey results were used to estimate the complying marketshare for proposed categories Overall, results showed 45% of products and 50% of sales would comply with the proposed VOC content limits More detailed category specific data is provided in Annex 2 of the Discussion Document

Emissions Reductions An estimate of the emissions reductions associated with the proposed VOC content limits indicates that implementation of the proposed limits could achieve a 30% reduction in VOC emissions Using 2010 as a reference year, and assuming a 2% rate of growth, the overall impact of the proposed VOC content limits could be an 18% reduction in emissions from 2002 levels (20.8 kt)

Effective Date The proposed effective date for the regulations has not yet been established Environment Canada is seeking industry input on the length of time needed to reformulate products in the Canadian marketplace

For Additional Information The March 2005 Discussion Document outlines all of the proposed elements and a table indicating the proposed VOC content limits http://www.ec.gc.ca/nopp/DOCS/regs/voc/coat/en/DiscussDoc.cfm Detailed information on each proposed category is contained in Annex 2 of the Discussion Document Bituminous Roof Coatings 300 g/L Bituminous Roof Primers 350 g/L Roof Coatings (Non-bituminous) 250 g/L

Path Forward for Consultation Feedback on the proposed elements was invited from stakeholders: Over 20 sets of comments received Several comments received on: Bituminous roof coatings Bituminous roof primers Roof coatings (non-bituminous) Preliminary review of comments indicate further work is required further research in specific areas industry asked to provide additional information to strengthen cost impact analysis

Path Forward for Regulatory Development Analysis of feedback on proposed elements (Summer/Fall 2005) Further information gathering (as required) (Summer/Fall 2005) Follow-up consultations (Fall 2005) Proposed regulations written and published in Canada Gazette, Part I (Spring 2006). Publication is followed by comment period (minimum 60 days) Final Regulation written and published in Canada Gazette, Part II

Contact Information Alex Cavadias Head, VOC Controls Section Chemical Controls Branch Environment Canada Phone: 819.953.1132 Fax: 819.994.0007 Email: alex.cavadias@ec.gc.ca Website: http://www.ec.gc.ca/nopp/voc/ AIM Coatings: Sarah Ternan Gatineau, QC K1A 0H3 Phone: 819.953.9451 Email: sarah.ternan@ec.gc.ca