Severe Accident Qualification EPR™ OL3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
Advertisements

IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY BY INSTALLING OR USING THE SOFTWARE, FILES OR OTHER ELECTRONIC.
Lesson 18 - Decay Heat DEFINE the term decay heat. Given the operating conditions of a reactor core and the necessary formulas, CALCULATE the core decay.
PLANT DESIGN (I) Prof. Dr. Hasan farag.
Innovations in Structured Products October 25, 2010 An Innovator’s Dilemma?
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – Safety approach Madrid, November Sophie EHSTER.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
Fatigue Management Rule Russell Smith Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
MESSAGING IN THE MEDIA TOP 10 DRUGS BASED ON CREDIBILITY INDEX IN THE LITERATURE JOHN KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF ANALYTICS MAY 2009 Your use of these materials.
Therapeutic area breakdown of lead projects in development for first launch in 2005 APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM ©
Paragraph IV Patent Challenges – As of July 1, 2008 JULY 2008 David Harding, API Intelligence, Thomson Reuters Source: FDA, NEWPORT HORIZON PREMIUM TM.
Proportion of biotech-derived active substances in development for first launch 31st December APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
1 Washington, Sept 29th, 2014 Informal working group: Large Lithium batteries testing RECHARGE & SAFT.
Analytical Approaches to Evaluate Residual Cable Lifetime Module 4 Dr. John H. Bickel Evergreen Safety & Reliability Technologies, LLC.
Radiation Tolerant Electronics Expected changes Ph. Farthouat, CERN.
Proportion of total R&D expenditure by therapeutic area in 2005 APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON REUTERS Your.
Global R&D expenditure, development times, global pharmaceutical sales and new molecular entity output MARCH 2008 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL.
Materials Integration by Fission Reactor Irradiation and Essential Basic Studies for Overall Evaluation Presented by N.Yoshida and K.Abe At the J-US Meeting,
2005/2006 Expenditure on biotech derived entities had remained constant APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON REUTERS.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INTRODUCTION Module 2.
Number of pharmaceutical patent applications and granted patents for 5 major patent issuing authorities JUNE 2008 SOURCE: DERWENT WORLD PATENTS.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Regulatory approval times between submission and marketing authorization approval APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM.
Availability of High-Quality API for India, China and Rest of World MARCH 2008 David Harding, API Intelligence, Thomson Reuters Source: NEWPORT HORIZON.
Allocation of R&D expenditure in 2005 between chemical entity and biological or biotech active substances APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
Copyright © 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle Proprietary and Confidential. 1.
Version 1.0, May 2015 SHORT COURSE BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components This material.
Protection and Relay Schemes
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XI Operational limits and conditions Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
Workshop on CSM-DT, November 2016
Financing the cashew sector
Issues of personal data protection in scientific research
Mild Environment Qualification and Maintenance
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
BIOLOGY / CHEMISTRY CITATIONS GROWTH
IEEE 383 Standard for Qualifying Electric Cables and Splices for Nuclear Facilities Preview SC-2 May 12, 2014 Robert Konnik.
IEEE SC-2 International Standard Review
EQ programs at Mochovce NPP – Severe Accident Cases
Automation in an XML Authoring Environment
Messaging in the Media TOP 10 AUDIENCES BY THERAPY AREA
IEEE P650 Status Chair Dennis Dellinger Ametek Solidstate Controls
INRAG Public Conference, April 13 – 14, Aachen, Germany
2006 Revenue continued to depend on a relatively small number of products APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON REUTERS.
, R&D expenditure showed 6% growth annually
2002–2006 Mid and Other sized companies continued to launch the majority of NMEs APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON.
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
Proportion of total R&D expenditure on alliances or joint ventures by stage of R&D in 2005 APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM.
Market linked debentures
Agenda Introduction of Protective Relays
NME/NAS launches in 2005/6 APRIL 2007
Gas-Lift Workshop Breakout Session
% of the projects in development in the leading therapeutic areas were considered to have a novel mode of action APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL.
New Process Qualification
Motivation for 36OU Open Rack
Pipeline size of Major companies had grown at a steadier rate than that of smaller companies APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
Development time for new molecular entities first launched onto the world market between MARCH 2008 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS.
Cycle times decreased in larger but not smaller, companies
Session-5: Ask Experts about Troubleshooting Multiphase Flow in Pipes
Proportion of total R&D expenditure by function in 2005
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
INRAG Public Conference, April 13 – 14, Aachen, Germany
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
ENERGY TRANSFORMATIONS
When the Marker Breaks TheoTrade Summer School with Tony Rago
Emotional Intelligence: The Core of Family Offices
Presentation transcript:

Severe Accident Qualification EPR™ OL3 Dirk C. HOPP Expert and Senior Advisor / PTCQA Clearwater Beach 2014-05-12 to 14

Severe Accidents Qualification Severe Accidents (SA) are considered by Design for EPR™ Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.3

Severe Accidents Qualification General Qualification Approach (1/2) Multiple failures in plant Safety Systems could lead to their complete loss. This loss of function leads to Beyond design basis accidents Significant core degradation However, EPR™ handles the SA identical/similar to the Design Basis Events like Loss of Coolant Accidents (LOCA) Comparison of Environmental Accident Conditions of SA and LOCA Quite similar P&T profiles Higher globally irradiation for SA, extremely high at concerned areas Higher temperatures at concerned areas Specific requirements are defined for respective EPR™ Projects Safety Analysis Report Technical Specifications Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.4

Severe Accidents Qualification General Qualification Approach (2/2) In general, the equipment needed for the mitigation and/or monitoring of an SA can be divided into two groups: Equipment which is directly subjected to the SA conditions (inside containment) Equipment which has to tolerate consequences of the SA (outside containment) Mission times for SA in the EPR™ are defined as follows: Midterm (MT): Required function up to 100 hours after start of the SA Long term (LT): Required function up to one year after start of the SA Individual Mission Times may be defined (e.g. 24 h for Intermediate Excore Neutron Detectors) Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.5

Severe Accidents Qualification Parts of the Qualification (1/4) Design Tests as Part of the Research and Development Process Validation of required Design Testing to determine design limits May be material tests (e.g. long-term endurance test) Type Tests according to Product Standards Based on the design data and/or on values required by Product Standards May be performed on different sets of specimens Testing according to Product Standards (if applicable) Testing of the behavior for transportation Electrical functions and signal stabilities (determination of tolerances) Mechanical integrity (resistance to pressure, induced vibration loads) Material tests (endurance test) Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.6

Severe Accidents Qualification Parts of the Qualification (2/4) Type Tests in accordance to Nuclear Standards Functional tests at postulated conditions Qualified life tests SA simulation tests, including simulation of the Post Accident Phase Qualified Life tests Have to be performed on the same specimens in a defined sequence representing the consequences of the loads in the life cycle of the equipment Definition of Design Life is necessary (e.g. 60 / 30 / 15 years) Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.7

Severe Accidents Qualification Parts of the Qualification (3/4) Pre-Conditioning Loads due to transportation Thermal ageing Radiation ageing Mechanical ageing Load cycles representing start-up and shut-down Loads due to pressurization cycles (e.g. containment integrity tests) Vibration ageing (e.g. location of sensors/valves on high energy pipes) Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.8

Severe Accidents Qualification Parts of the Qualification (4/4) Severe Accident Simulation Test Accident irradiation 1 (e.g. 800 kGy for SA Midterm 100 h; recommended dose rate is the average for the duration = 8 kGy/h) SA simulation (P&T profile) test performed in real time (for Midterm 100 h) Accident irradiation 2 (e.g. 4200 kGy total SA dose for the rest of the year; recommended dose rate is = 5 kGy/h) Post-SA test: Accelerated test with a weighted average temperature (based on activation energy value of materials); chemical spray (2500 ppm of boric acid); recommended duration 8-12 weeks (corrosion effects) Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.9

Severe Accidents Qualification Summary Severe Accidents are considered by Design for EPR™ EPR™ handles Severe Accidents identical/similar to Design Basis Events Qualification Steps depends on the Mission Times In general Design Tests and Type Tests according to Product Standards are preconditions before starting Nuclear Qualification Severe Accidents Qualifications consists of almost “usual” LOCA qualification methods Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.10

Editor and Copyright [2014-05-11]: AREVA GmbH – Paul-Gossen-Straße 100 – 91052 Erlangen, Germany. It is prohibited to reproduce the present publication in its entirety or partially in whatever form without prior written consent. Legal action may be taken against any infringer and/or any person breaching the aforementioned prohibitions. Subject to change without notice, errors excepted. Illustrations may differ from the original. The statements and information in this brochure are for advertising purposes only and do not constitute an offer of contract. They shall neither be construed as a guarantee of quality or durability, nor as warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. These statements, even if they are future-orientated, are based on information that was available to us at the date of publication. Only the terms of individual contracts shall be authoritative for type, scope and characteristics of our products and services. Severe Accident Qualification – IEEE SC2 – Dirk C. HOPP – 2014-05-12 to 14 - AREVA GmbH Proprietary – RESTRICTED AREVA - © AREVA - AL: N - ECCN: N - p.11

End of presentation Severe Accident Qualification Dirk C. HOPP Expert and Senior Advisor / PTCQA Clearwater Beach 2014-05-12 to 14