Advanced process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self-optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The control hierarchy based on “time scale separation” MPC (slower advanced and multivariable control) PID (fast “regulatory” control) PROCESS setpoints.
Advertisements

1 Outline Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of freedom Step 2: Operational.
PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING GROUP Førsteamanuensis Tore Haug-Warberg Professor Heinz Preisig Professor Sigurd Skogestad Førsteamanuensis Nadi Skjøndal-Bar.
Specialization project 2012 Temperature control of an unstable chemical reactor By Ola Sæterli Hjetland Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad, Krister Forsman.
1 CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
1 Outline Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of freedom Step 2: Operational.
Plantwide process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self- optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2014.
Practical plantwide process control Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU Thailand, April 2014.
GHGT-8 Self-Optimizing and Control Structure Design for a CO 2 Capturing Plant Mehdi Panahi, Mehdi Karimi, Sigurd Skogestad, Magne Hillestad, Hallvard.
1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
First African Control Conference, Cape Town, 04 December 2003
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
1 Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU)
PSE and PROCESS CONTROL
1 1 Economic Plantwide Control, July 2015 ECONOMIC PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and.
Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down
Simple rules for PID tuning Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Practical plantwide process control Part 1
1 1 V. Minasidis et. al. | Simple Rules for Economic Plantwide ControlSimple Rules for Economic Plantwide Control, PSE & ESCAPE 2015 SIMPLE RULES FOR ECONOMIC.
1 Structure of the process control system Benefits from MPC (Model Predictive Control) and RTO (Real Time Optimization) Sigurd Skogestad Department of.
1 A Plantwide Control Procedure Applied to the HDA Process Antonio Araújo and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University.
1 Practical plantwide process control. Extra Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU Thailand, April 2014.
Implementation of Coordinator MPC on a Large-Scale Gas Plant
Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim,
Topic 5 Enhanced Regulatory Control Strategies. In the last lecture  Feedforward Control –Measured Vs Unmeasured Loads –Purpose of feedforward control.
1 Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU)
1 Outline Control structure design (plantwide control) A procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step 1: Degrees of freedom Step 2: Operational.
1 Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control Inventory (level) control structure –Location of throughput manipulator –Consistency and radiating rule Structure.
1 PLANTWIDE CONTROL Identifying and switching between active constraints regions Sigurd Skogestad and Magnus G. Jacobsen Department of Chemical Engineering.
1 II. Bottom-up Determine secondary controlled variables and structure (configuration) of control system (pairing) A good control configuration is insensitive.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL ( ) Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology.
1 PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway August/September.
1 Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down Step S1: Define operational objective (cost) and constraints Step S2: Identify degrees.
1 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PLANTWIDE CONTROL ( ) Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology.
Control strategies for optimal operation of complete plants Plantwide control - With focus on selecting economic controlled variables Sigurd Skogestad,
Coordinator MPC with focus on maximizing throughput
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Part 5: Advanced control + case studies
Probably© the smoothest PID tuning rules in the world: Lower limit on controller gain for acceptable disturbance rejection Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Throughput maximization by improved bottleneck control
Model SIMC-tunings Tight control Smooth control Level control
A systematic procedure for economic plantwide control
PID-tuning using the SIMC rules
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
MPC in Statoil Stig Strand, specialist MPC Statoil Research Center 93  SINTEF Automatic Control Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Changing between Active Constraint Regions for Optimal Operation: Classical Advanced Control versus Model Predictive Control Adriana Reyes-Lúa, Cristina.
Process Control Engineering
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
PLANTWIDE CONTROL Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering
CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION
Outline Skogestad procedure for control structure design I Top Down
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
Implementation of a MPC on a deethanizer
Perspectives and future directions in control structure selection
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Plantwide control: Towards a systematic procedure
PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING GROUP
Example “stabilizing” control: Distillation
Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control
Outline Control structure design (plantwide control)
PID control of unstable chemical reactor
Presentation transcript:

Advanced process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self-optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2016

Course information 7 lectures by Sigurd + 2 industrial lectures Time to be determined at the end 6 exercises + help sessions Exercises count 20% of the grade of the module Exercise hours to be determined at the end

Course Summary This course is about how to operate and control complete chemical plants Find active constraints + self-optimizing variables (CV1). (Economic optimal operation) Locate throughput manipulator (TPM) “Gas pedal” Select stabilizing CV2 + tune regulatory loops SIMC PID rules Design supervisory layer (control CV1) Multi-loop (PID) ++ MPC

Plantwide process control Part 1 : Plantwide control Part 2 : More on self-optimizing control. Part 3 : Consistent inventory control, TPM location, Structure of regulatory control layer Part 4 : PID tuning Part 5 : “Advanced” control and case studies

Part 1: Plantwide control Introduction to plantwide control (what should we really control?) Introduction. Objective: Put controllers on flow sheet (make P&ID) Two main objectives for control: Longer-term economics (CV1) and shorter-term stability (CV2) Regulatory (basic) and supervisory (advanced) control layer Optimal operation (economics) Define cost J and constraints Active constraints (as a function of disturbances) Selection of economic controlled variables (CV1). Self-optimizing variables.

Part 2: Self-optimizing control theory Ideal CV1 = Gradient (Ju) Nullspace method Exact local method Link to other approaches Examples, exercises  

Part 3: Regulatory («stabilizing») control Inventory (level) control structure Location of throughput manipulator Consistency and radiating rule Structure of regulatory control layer (PID) Selection of controlled variables (CV2) and pairing with manipulated variables (MV2) Main rule: Control drifting variables and "pair close" Summary: Sigurd’s rules for plantwide control  

Part 4: PID tuning PID controller tuning: It pays off to be systematic!   Derivation SIMC PID tuning rules Controller gain, Integral time, derivative time Obtaining first-order plus delay models Open-loop step response From detailed model (half rule) From closed-loop setpoint response Special topics Integrating processes (level control) Other special processes and examples When do we need derivative action? Near-optimality of SIMC PID tuning rules Non PID-control: Is there an advantage in using Smith Predictor? (No) Examples

Part 5: Advanced control + case studies Advanced control layer Design based on simple elements: Ratio control Cascade control Selectors Input resetting (valve position control) Split range control Decouplers (including phsically based) When should these elements be used? When use MPC instead? Case studies Example: Distillation column control Example: Plantwide control of complete plant Recycle processes: How to avoid snowballing

Course Plan 2016 Week/Date Lecture Exercise Week 34 / 22.08. 0. Introduction 1. Plant-wide control procedure Exercise 1 out (2 weeks) Week 35 / 29.08. 2. Self-optimizing control   Week 36 / 05.09. 3. Self-optimizing control Exercise 1 deadline Exercise 2 out (1 week) Week 37 / 12.09. 4. Self-optimizing control Exercise 2 deadline Exercise 3 out (1 week) Week 38 / 19.09. 5. Regulatory layer, TPM Selection Exercise 3 deadline Exercise 4 out (2 weeks) Week 39 / 26.10. 6. Controller Tuning Week 40 / 03.10. 7. Advanced control structures Exercise 4 deadline Exercise 5 out (2 weeks) Week 41 / 10.10. Week 42 / 17.10. Exercise 5 deadline Exercise 6 out (2 weeks) Week 43 / 24.10. Week 44 / 31.10. Exercise 6 deadline Lecturer: Sigurd Skogestad (skoge@ntnu.no) Exercises: Julian Straus (julian.straus@ntnuno) Note, that the days of the lecture may change. There will be two guest lectures given by Stig Strand: MPC application in Statoil Krister Forsman: Advanced process control in Perstorp The dates of both guest lectures have to be defined