Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

Plantinga’s ontological argument
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument Define the terms: Ontology, Analytic, Synthetic, God. Recall Psalm 14:1. Define God in Anselm’s terms. Summarise Anselm’s Ontological.
The Ontological Proof For around a thousand years, various proofs for the existence of God have gone by the name ‘The Ontological Proof.’ The first person.
The Ontological Argument
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Phil 1000 Two weeks on God, with Professor Bradley Monton.
Ontological arguments Concept of God: perfect being –God is supposed to be a perfect being. –That’s just true by definition. –Even an atheist can agree.
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. A BASIC INTRODUCTION. THIS MUST BE USED AS A STARTING POINT : OTHER SHEETS, TEXT BOOK AND INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED TO HAVE.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
LECTURE 14 WHY IS THERE ANYTHING AT ALL? THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Ontological Argument
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
Chapter 1: Religion Proving God: The Ontological Argument Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological argument 2 This time it’s critical!
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
The ontological argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Arguments for The Existence of God
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Philosophy of Religion AO2 1 d, e and f evaluation questions
Criticisms of the Ontological Argument
The ontological argument: an a-priori argument (ie, deductive rather than inductive) Anselm ‘God’ is that being than which nothing greater can be conceived’;
Other versions of the ontological argument
Ontological arguments for God’s existence:
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
The Ontological Argument Ontological
Philosophy of Religion AO2 1 d, e and f evaluation questions
Philosophy of Religion AO2 1 d, e and f evaluation questions
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
A: What would Anselm say. B: What would Gaunilo say
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
The Ontological Argument Aim: To explore the attributes of God.
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
Necessary Being Discussion 1
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
2) Who said ‘Ex nihilo, nihil fit’?
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Other versions of the ontological argument
The Ontological Argument
What makes these things different?
The Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Ontological Argument – challenges against
Arguments for The Existence of God
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God 11th November 2013 P4 AS Philosophy Jez Echevarría

Objectives MAP 2 To consider our basic idea of God To examine the Ontological Argument for the existence of God

MAP 2 Philosophy AS 1) Explain and illustrate two objections to the view that if we understand what is good and acquire the virtues, we will flourish and be happy. (15 marks) 2) ‘The only genuinely moral motivation for performing an action is that it is the right action.’ Discuss. (30 marks) 60-65 Minutes

Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument is: An A Priori argument A deductive argument – you cannot reject the conclusion if you have accepted all the premises and the conclusion follows logically

Anselm’s version 1) God is by definition that than which nothing greater can be conceived. This definition is understood by believers and non-believers. 2) It is one thing to exist in the mind alone and another to exist both in the mind and in reality. 3) It is greater to exist in the mind and in reality than to exist in the mind alone. Conc) Therefore God must exist both in reality as well as in the mind. If God is just an idea in the mind, then the definition points to something greater – a God who exists both in the mind and in reality.

Any Problems? Can God really be conceived? Is it “greater” to exist in reality? Is existence a property (or predicate) that can be added or taken away? Gaunillo’s island Anselm’s reply (Necessary versus Contingent)

Alvin Plantinga (possible worlds) REAL 1 2 3 567 568 7890 9056

Plantinga (as a deductive argument) It is accepted by philosophers that there is an infinity of possible worlds (though only one is actual). All possibilities are played out in these possible worlds. Therefore the supreme conceivable being must exist in some of these worlds. But we can conceive of the supreme conceivable being existing in all of these possible worlds. If the supreme possible being, already proven to exist in some of these worlds, only exists in those worlds, it is not the supreme conceivable being. Therefore this being must exist in all possible worlds. Given that all possible worlds includes the actual one, this being must exist in the actual one (e.g. ours). Conc: Therefore God exists.  

What have I learnt today? MAP 2 To consider our basic idea of God To examine the Ontological Argument for the existence of God