What do Neonatal Networks want from NNAP?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The SIMS Partnership Transforming health care delivery Shared Information Management Services University Health Network The SIMS Partnership Transforming.
Advertisements

Clinical Dashboards – background information Clinical Dashboard - a “toolset developed to provide clinicians with the relevant and timely information they.
Parent Engagement Jane Abbott Head of Programmes.
Information Literacy – Are you prepared or paralysed Heather Strachan NMAHP Clinical Lead Scottish Government
Making the most of your survey results Caroline Powell.
20 January 2012 WMQI Measuring and improving quality in neonatal care.
The Health Roundtable 4-4c_HRT1215-Session_CLARK_PCHosp_QLD TPCH: Using Data to Improve Performance – The Clinical Dashboard Presenter: Kevin Clark The.
Tackling Child Obesity in Hertfordshire
The Role Of The Dementia Care Home Liaison Nurse Within South East Essex Jackie Smith Clinical Nurse Specialist Dementia Care Home Liaison Nurse.
Health Research & Information Division, ESRI, Dublin, July 2008 The Audit Process.
IBIS-Admin New Mexico’s Web-based, Public Health Indicator, Content Management System.
Developing Quality Indicators & Dashboards for Dementia Adam Cook South East Coast Quality Observatory.
***Please note some slides have been removed since the webinar at the presenter’s request. CUSP for VAP Revisiting Your Action Plan: Using Reports to.
Streamlining Workshop. Streamlining Staff Movements Background London – JD Changeover Programme SfH – Skills Passport Programme North West – until now.
Key performance indicators Lean Transformation Network, 22 February 2011 Libby Tait Associate Director, Modernisation.
WEEK 9 supporting significant life events Olutoyin Hussain.
NHS West Kent Clinical Commissioning Group West Kent Urgent Care DRAFT Strategy Delivering a safe and sustainable urgent care system by
Gaynor Jones Geraint Morris. Third annual audit of breastmilk use on the Neonatal Unit Audit Questions: 1) Are we starting feeds with EBM/donor EBM during.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Implementing Clinical Governance COMPASS Consultant Outcome Indicators Programme.
Southern Health Productive Mental Health Ward Adult Mental Health Inpatient Services.
Feedback from Stakeholder Engagement Event 6 th July 2016 Neonatal Service Review.
Info Trafford
Workforce Repository & Planning Tool
National Stroke Audit Rehabilitation Services 2016
Greater Manchester Cancer
ePREM & YVM Data Information Session
Why your baby’s data are important
Maternity Transformation in Nottinghamshire
A Commissioner’s Perspective
Parallel Sessions: Pathways & Prediction
Sarah Leng Quality and Patient Safety Collaborative, KSS AHSN
Friends and Family Test (FFT ) Results for December 2014
Primary Care Support England
Lisa Dawson – Head of Student Systems Operations
Jack Millaway and Melody Robinson LPHI
Engaging Bedside Nurses in the EHR Change Request Process
Why your baby’s data are important
All Wales Qi Initiative Improving Badgernet Data Quality
Prescriber Led Antibiotic Audits and Ward Rounds
Discovery in Action: Case Study
Peg Bradke and Rebecca Steinfield
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Patient Engagement Group –Part 2 – Digital Transformation
HRA User Satisfaction Report
What do Neonatal Networks want from NNAP?
Improving the performance reporting of primary care patient experience
National Neonatal Audit Programme 2016
Sarah Leng Quality and Patient Safety Collaborative, KSS AHSN
Topic: Building a Disability Management System
The first 5 months Jo Quirk Lead Nurse.
Analysis of Questionnaires (qualitative and quantitative)
Why your baby’s data are important
Sandra Winterburn, Senior Lecturer & Consultation Skills Lead
NETT Recruitment-Admissions Interactive Review Congruence Survey for case study 2 Relationship between recruitment and admissions activity.
WMQI Neonates 10 November 2011.
ATAIN IN THE South West The role of the SW NEONATAL NETWORK TIMELINE – Term Admission CQUIN; 7 Trusts in the SW – Local ATAIN.
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Bath and North East Somerset
Discovery in Action: Case Study
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Sarah Leng Quality and Patient Safety Collaborative, KSS AHSN
Friends and Family Test (FFT ) Results for October 2014
Communications impact report
Introduction Strategy 5 strategic aims
Discovery in Action: Case Study
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Discovery in Action: Case Study
National data opt-out - Preparing for implementation
Discovery in Action: Case Study
Presentation transcript:

What do Neonatal Networks want from NNAP? Rebecca Lemin

Introduction Rebecca Lemin Manager of the South West Neonatal Network 12 Units Geographically large - 250 miles 60,000 birth rate

Health Warning……

Questions asked……. Does the data from NNAP/NDAU come in a useful format? Does it come in the right frequency ? Is NNAP online useful – do you use it? Are the indicators sustainable/right ? Do you have any questions in regards to the sources of info used and should anything be streamlined? Could Networks do anything more to inform units about NNAP data?

Neonatal Networks Data Teams 80% of all Networks have data analysts All have access to Badgernet across all their units Networks collaborate closely with Data Leads from across their units. Much more skilled in cleaning, analysing and presenting data Using data to support more complex work programmes e.g. Transformation programmes, large scale service reviews, research, projects. All Networks produce dashboards for Units/NHSE – Encompasses Badgernet/NNAP/VON data

Does the data from NNAP come in a useful format? User friendly, Good mixture of graphs, narrative and tables. Concerns over methods to communicate data: Too many emails – diminishes importance Emails draconian and impersonal – esp when communicating to outliers Difficulty in getting timely responses from NNAP – particularly to emails Trend data not east to analyse Suggestions More personal approach – similar to VON – make direct contact with units. Ready made presentations for Clinicians to share locally NNAP to understand better how Networks use data and what skills they have.

Does it come in the right frequency ? Yes Happy with reductions in time lags Units likely to access it quarterly or as and when required. Some Networks reported quarterly use to populate Network Dashboards Other Networks only accessed data yearly – to obtain Annual Report. Monthly reports not felt to be necessary.

Is NNAP online useful – do you use it? Mixture of awareness re NNAP online. Question about who the audience of NNAP online is? Queries raised over the ‘patient friendly’ nature of the website Limitations of online site Can only compare 2 networks, 4 hospitals at a time Cant compare all units within a network area. Only 2 yrs of data online Value to Networks Feedback that one clinician uses it to show staff performance against other local hospitals Suggestions Further promotion to Network and Clinicians Consideration of parent audience

Are the indicators sustainable/right ? Too many – need streamlining. Increasing Maternity Measures – Not direct impact on Neonatal Activity/process focused – Not outcomes Do we have the best indicators for what we are wanting to measure? – e.g. Breast Milk at discharge, two yr follow up. Uncertainty about new indicators - E.g Term Admission Indicator, parents on ward rounds – What is it telling us? Effort needed in defining clinical terms more closely – E.g using better denominator data such as live birth rates NNAP indicators drive Badger queries causing difficulties in data entry Streamlining between NNAP and Badgernet - haphazard

Continued……. Suggestions Remove Maternity focused measures. Use live birth rate as denominator Rather than developing additional indicators - focus on improving entry/reducing variability of data already entered Increased clinical rather than process indicators e.g. CLD, HO rates, Line related sepsis, Bile stained aspirates. Links to national work programmes to develop relevant targets e.g. Atain Increased communication with Badgernet to streamlined process and iron out recording issues. Increased frontline teaching to staff on recording and expectations

Could Networks do anything more to inform units about NNAP data? Good communications and dissemination with Units - Proactive. Satisfaction with current methods of communication between NNAP and networks. Missing data useful All Networks have data analysts /direct access to Badgernet – diminished usage. Suggestions Would welcome greater assessment of data accuracy: e.g. % of data fields changed NNAP to support networks in improving data accuracy across units