Integrated Marketplace Why. What is it

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
1. ***Confidential*** Concerns Tag Non Firm Option October 10, 2010 Bert Bressers 2.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Overview of CAISO Stakeholder Process for FERC Order 764 Compliance Implementation of 15 minute scheduling and settlement Jim Price, CAISO Presentation.
Copyright 2003 PJM 1 PJM’s Annual FTR Auction.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Session 4 Discussion of Alternatives and Implementation Activities for Real- Time.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #2 July 15, 2010.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Updated 1/28/2011. Cost Allocations and Affordability of Tariffs March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Updated 1/28/2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) EDS 3 Release 7 - Overview EDS 3 Phase 2 MP Planning.
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
1 Pacific Northwest Hydro-Thermal System and RTO West Market Design FERC Market Design Workshop January 23, 2002.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission MISO/Alliance Companies’ RTO Status Reports Presented by: Joseph Power Tony Ingram Rahim Amerkhail Patrick Clarey.
SPP: A Closer Look Heather Starnes Manager, Regulatory Policy 2.
Congestion Hedging Process Transmission Planning Summit September 21-22, 2011.
Long-Term Congestion Rights (LTCR) Weekly Testing Call January 5, Project Pinnacle.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Texas Nodal Team Cost Benefit Group Background to Standard Market Design in New England March 2, 2004 Michael Taniwha Manager, Market Administration ISO.
Review of PUC Discussion on Nodal Market Adoption Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2005.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
Market Redesign Update ERCOT Board of Directors Meeting April 18, 2006 Ron Hinsley Chief Information Officer
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Integrated Marketplace Why? What is it? Impacts to SPP Members Richard Dillon Director, Market Design.
The Texas Nodal Market Trip Doggett ERCOT Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Mike Cleary ERCOT Chief Technology Officer Executive Briefing 28.
August 11, 2008 TPTF EDS Sequence and Durations Discussion Daryl Cote.
CMTF Tariff Language Clarification 1. Parking Lot Question Is the Planning Reserve Margin requirement meant to be maintained throughout the whole calendar.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Market Trials Congestion Revenue Rights
IPC’s Energy Imbalance Market OATT Stakeholder Meeting
Nodal Program Update to Cops
Wind Management at MISO
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Integrated Marketplace Why. What is it
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Further Information on MISO FTR Auctions
North American Markets Status
Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs for a low-carbon future
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Hot Topics in PJM: Price Formation and Public Policy
Westar Formula Rate and your bill
Update on Energy Imbalance Market
Mountain West Transmission Group Panel Discussion
Update on Market Trials
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Marketplace Why. What is it Integrated Marketplace Why? What is it? Impacts to SPP Members Richard Dillon Director, Market Design

Key Dates in Integrated Marketplace History Key Milestone Completion Date Begin Integrated Marketplace Business Design Summer 2007 Cost-Benefit Analysis for Future Markets Completed April 2009 RSC Endorsement of Cost-Benefit Analysis SPP Stakeholders developed detailed Market Design 2008-2010 MWG Finalized Baseline Protocols September 2010 MOPC Approval of Baseline Protocols October 2010 Board Approval of Implementation Budget January 2011 Board Release of Funds April 2011 SPP Contracted Vendors May 2011 Real-time Balancing Market solving December 2011 Tariff Revisions filed at FERC February 2012 2 2

Marketplace Timeline FAT: Factory Acceptance Test | SAT: Site Acceptance Test | FIT: Functional Integration Test | PT: Performance Test

Why Integrated Marketplace? Net Benefits ~ $100 million/year Reduce total energy costs through centralized unit commitment while maintaining reliable operations Day-Ahead Market allows additional price assurance capability prior to real-time Includes new markets for Operating Reserve to support implementation of Consolidated Balancing Authority (CBA) and facilitate reserve sharing

Integrated Marketplace Third Party Reservations Centralized Commitment EIS vs. Integrated Marketplace Features Capability EIS Integrated Marketplace Transmission Reservations  Scheduling (internal/external) All Reservations Third Party Reservations Transmission Congestion Rights Energy Bilaterals Day-Ahead Market Real-Time Balancing Market Operating Reserves and Regulation Self-Designated Market Unit Commitment Self-Commitment Centralized Commitment Balancing Authority Multiple Single

SPP design leverages proven features from other RTO markets CAISO ERCOT Nodal MISO PJM SPP Marketplace Day-Ahead Market  Real-Time Market Marginal Losses Co-Optimization Must Offer in Day-Ahead Market Resource Make-Whole Payment Transmission Congestion Rights/Auction Revenue Rights (TCR/ARR) Virtual Energy 6 6

Design was selective for regional differences CAISO ERCOT Nodal MISO PJM SPP Marketplace Combined-Cycle Special Handling Partial Implementation In Process  5-Minute Settlement  (Operating Reserve only) Zonal Operating Reserve Cost Allocation Installed Capacity Market Reliability Must Run 7 7

Day Ahead Reliability Unit Commitment Real-Time Balancing Market SPP Integrated Marketplace Functions Time Annual/ Monthly Operating Day - 1 Operating Day - 1 Operating Day Operating Day + 7 ARR/TCR Auction Day Ahead Reliability Unit Commitment Intra-Day RUC Real-Time Balancing Market Settlement Day Ahead Market Makes sure enough capacity committed for next operating time frame Real-Time dispatch much like today’s EIS Market Performs unit commitment Sets DA prices TCRs cleared 8 8

Day-Ahead Market Scope and Objective Determines least-cost solution to meet Energy Bids and Reserve requirements Participants submit Offers and Bids to purchase and/ or sell Energy and Operating Reserve: Energy Regulation-Up Regulation-Down Spinning Reserve Supplemental Reserve

Day-Ahead Market to achieve cost-effective unit commitment “Must offer” for physical Resources proposed in market design Includes Offers/Bids for virtual supply and virtual Load Import/Export schedules may also be submitted Co-optimizes Energy and Operating Reserve and produces Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) and Market Clearing Prices (MCPs) to meet Energy Bids and Operating Reserve

Day-Ahead Market creates financially binding energy and commitment forecast Preliminary Unit Commitment is performed Creates financially-binding day-ahead schedule for Energy and Operating Reserve for Resources and Load that participate SPP guarantees revenue sufficiency of committed Resource Offers Transmission Congestions Rights are settled with these LMPs

Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Scope and Objective Day-Ahead RUC performed following Day-Ahead Market clearing Intra-Day RUC performed throughout Operating Day as needed, at least every four hours RUC ensures market physical commitment and produces adequate deliverable capacity to meet SPP Load Forecast and Operating Reserve requirements

RUC is in addition to Day-Ahead Market Every available Resource has to offer SPP guarantees revenue sufficiency of committed Resource Offers

Real-Time Balancing Market similar to today’s EIS - balancing Resources and Load. Uses Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) to ensure results are physically feasible Operates on continuous 5-minute basis Calculates Dispatch Instructions for Energy and clears Operating Reserve by Resource Energy and Operating Reserve are co-optimized Settlements based on difference between results of RTBM process and Day-Ahead Market clearing Charges imposed on Market Participants for failure to deploy Energy and Operating Reserve as instructed

EIS Market BAs SPP EIS BAs (16) XXX Not in EIS Market SPP is TSP (1) WAUE EIS Market BAs MEC MISO NPPD OPPD LES AMMO MISO CLEC EES CSWS SPRM EDE KCPL MPS KACY WR SECI OKGE WFEC SPS GRDA INDN XXX SPP EIS BAs (16) WSCC AECI Not in EIS Market SPP is TSP (1) XXX SPA XXX 1st tier BAs ERCOT

Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) and Transmission Congestions Rights (TCRs)

ARRs and TCRs allow Resource owners to be indifferent to unit commitment impact on congestion Annual TCR Auction Annual ARR Awards Monthly TCR

Auction Revenue Right (ARRs) … Market Participant’s entitlement to a share of revenue generated in TCR auctions Allocated to Market Participants based on firm transmission rights (NITS or PTP) on SPP transmission grid Can be a credit or charge based on the TCR auction clearing price of the ARR path Auction Revenue ARR Holders

Transmission Congestion Rights (TCRs) are… Financial Instruments that entitle owner to a stream of revenues or charges Based on hourly Day Ahead marginal congestion component differences across the path -OR-

ARRs awarded annually – are basis of TCRs ARRs allocated annually (in April) Market Participants nominate from Firm Transmission Service Network Integrated Transmission Service agreement Point to Point Firm Transmission Service Request ARRs awarded Monthly Seasonal On Peak Off Peak

How can I obtain TCRs? Annual TCR auction Monthly TCR auction Holder converts ARR Purchase transmission capability Monthly TCR auction Purchase “left over” transmission capability TCR secondary market

TCRs Process Overview

Settlement of ARRs/TCRs Net Auction revenues are allocated to holders of ARRs Daily TCR settlements use Day-Ahead Market prices Auction Revenues, congestion revenues, and congestion rights revenues are settled concurrently with the Operating Day.

Impact on SPP Members

New Member Activities: TCR Markets Staffing to support mock TCR Markets, starting by 1Q 2012 Staffing to support ARR processes and TCR auctions Monthly/Seasonal ARR process & TCR auction (42 annual model inputs) Monthly TCR auction (2 or 4 monthly model inputs) Staffing to support Secondary Market Bulletin board system Bilateral trading of existing TCRs

New Member Activities: Operations Staffing to support Day Ahead and Real-Time Balancing Market Develop Day-Ahead and Real-Time Decisional Data, including: Three-Part Offers (Energy, Start Up, No Load) Operating Reserve Offers (4 products) Work with vendors to develop software for internal use Lead time is at least one year prior to delivery to MPs SPP plans to meet with at least OATI, PCI, and ABB in February to review protocols and persuade development to begin

New Member Activities: Settlements Receive increased settlement statement detail 51 charge types vs. 7 currently and over 120 billing determinants Understand complex calculations involving market-wide totals or rates Make Whole Payments, Marginal Loss Surplus Analyze Transmission Congestion Settlements Develop new system interactions Review processes for credit Impacts of TCRs & ARRs Enhance reporting – internally and externally

Summary Although Integrated Marketplace implementation is March 2014, Market Participants need to prepare sooner: Analyze internal staffing Develop software products Develop Offers and Bids

Integrated Marketplace: Regulatory Timeline 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Program timeline State Commissions SPP FERC NERC Design 6/1 – 9/30 Build 10/1 – 6/30 FAT 7/1 – 9/30 SAT 10/1 – 12/31 Market Trials 1/1/13 – 1/1/14 Cutover & Deploy 1/1 – 3/31 Educational outreach sessions Sept. – Nov. Educational outreach sessions Feb. - May Educational outreach sessions Sept. – Nov. Educational outreach sessions Feb. - May Educational outreach sessions Sept. – Nov. Approval letters from State Commissions (10/1) State commission approvals (3/1) RTWG approval of Tariff revisions (11/18) MOPC reviews/approves Tariff revisions (12/6) Board approves Tariff revisions (1/31) Potential compliance filing (8/13) File Tariff revisions (2/29) Conditional Order (07/31) Final conditional approval (12/31) File readiness/reversion plans (3/1) File readiness cert. (1/2) Final go-live order (1/31) NERC approves CBA cert. (12/4)

Market Participant Milestones TCR Market Trials Begins

Role of State Regulators

Facilitation: Helping our members work together

RSC & CAWG Regional State Committee (RSC) Cost Allocation Working Group (CAWG) Arkansas Commissioner Reeves Pat Mosier Kansas Commissioner Wright Tom DeBaun/James Sanderson Oklahoma Chairman Murphy Trent Campbell Missouri Chairman Gunn Adam McKinnie Nebraska Chairman Siedschlag John Krajewski New Mexico Commissioner Lyons James Brack Texas Chairman Nelson Temujin Roach 33 33 33 33 33

What role do state regulators play? Regional State Committee - Retail regulatory commissioners from: Arkansas Nebraska Oklahoma Kansas New Mexico Texas Missouri Louisiana maintains active observer status Primary responsibility for: Cost allocation for transmission upgrades Approach for regional resource adequacy Allocation of transmission rights in SPP’s markets