G. Watts (UW/Seattle) For the Hidden Valley Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.
Advertisements

HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.
FTK Production on UC Tier3 and Hidden Valley Processes Jan 23, 2007 Erik Brubaker FTK meeting.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
DØ Higgs II Gordon Watts for the collaboration. 2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’ /07/2003 Outline Channels H  WW * H  H ++ H --  +  +  -
Data-coordinator report Lian-You SHAN ACC15 Jan 9, 2010, IHEP.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
US ATLAS T2/T3 Workshop at UTANovember 11, Profiling Analysis at Startup Jim Cochran Iowa State Outline: - Computing model status - Expected Early.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Timescale The nominal dates for SM approvals for EPS are June 30 and July 7 for the Plenary meetings, with availability of a draft supporting note to the.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Ido Mussche NIPHAD meeting, Februari 9 th :
28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.
TAGS in the Analysis Model Jack Cranshaw, Argonne National Lab September 10, 2009.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Victoria, Sept WLCG Collaboration Workshop1 ATLAS Dress Rehersals Kors Bos NIKHEF, Amsterdam.
Tim Christiansen (CERN), Claudio Campagnari (UCSB), and Benedikt Hegner (CERN) for the Top-Physics Group AOD/PAT-tuples: Top-PAG Plans and Needs for the.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Gordon Watts University of Washington – Seattle CPPM – Marseille Seminar Queen Mary – University of London May 27, m H Living Long at ATLAS.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Status of the Higgs to tau tau analysis Carlos Solans Cristobal Cuenca.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
1 Status of the W→τν Analysis: new event selection & comparison data/MC Lidia.
Skimming in Zztop Ricardo – SLT meeting.
Michael Carrigan Advisors: Kevin Black & Lidia Dell’Asta
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
Concluding discussion on Commissioning, Etmiss and DPD
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Long Lived Machine Learning
SM Direct Photons meeting
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
ALICE analysis preservation
Overview: high-energy computing
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Muon stopping target optimization
W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
ATLAS Data Analysis Ontology: ontological representation of investigations DKB Meeting.
Parameterization for ATLAS EMEC
John Chapman, University of Cambridge
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
ATLAS B-physics important periods
Optimizing Foam, A Monte Carlo Event Generator
ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop
D3PDs production+validation, preliminary TeV
PPR: Purpose, Timeline PPR = “Physics Performance Report”
Hidden Valley Processes
Alan Barr Claire Gwenlan
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Di-jets & MT2 for early SUSY discovery
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Intro to CIT 594
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
Muon Group Software Report
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
Samples and MC Selection
News and Communications
The others’ latest result about SUSY search with same-sign dimuon
Rare and Forbidden Decays in the Standard Model
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Presentation transcript:

G. Watts (UW/Seattle) For the Hidden Valley Group Data Preparation G. Watts (UW/Seattle) For the Hidden Valley Group

Overall Data Strategy – ESD’s The physics drives the data strategy

Hidden Valley The tunneling/mixing has an almost arbitrary time constant SM Particles can appear anywhere in the detector

Hidden Valley Detector and algorithms are optimized to find displaced vertices in the very center of the ID Not here… Many of our signals look like noise or badly formed jets or muons and are discarded by the default object ID algorithms in ATLAS We require the complete ESD for all of our events. (You’ll see many of these algorithms described later)

The Samples

ESD Data 2010: Skimmed ESD’s from the data 2011: DESD is only possibility 10 DESD’s in ATLAS DESD’s are designed for background 1 of 10 is signal, and we are part of that RPVLL – managed jointly by the SUSY group and the Exotics group Our DESD is configured to write full ESD as the DESD Full trigger rate Will work on reducing size and rate as we better understand the analysis Trigger is a stronger constraint, however.

DYee DYmumu hvHiggs100LJeMET4zd hvHiggs100LJMixMET4zd hvHiggs100LJMixMET8zd hvHiggs100LJPionMET4zd hvHiggs120 hvHiggs120tauVP20 hvHiggs140 hvHiggs140LJe4zd hvHiggs140LJe8zd hvHiggs140LJeMET8zd hvHiggs140LJeNET4zd hvHiggs140LJMix4zd hvHiggs140LJMix8zd hvHiggs140LJMixMET4zd hvHiggs140LJMixMET8zd hvHiggs140LJPion8zd hvHiggs140LJPionMET4zd hvHiggs140LJPionMET8zd hvHiggs140Long hvHiggs140tauVP20 hvHiggs140tauVP40 hvHiggsLJe4zd hvHiggsLJMix8zd hvHiggsLJPion4zd hvHiggsLJPion8zd hvLJvpiM10ct500_U0M06ct0 hvLJvpiM10ct500_U0M06ct0_05pi hvLJvpiM40ct0_U0M06ct80 hvLJvpiM4ct0_U0M06ct0 hvLJvpiM4ct0_U0M06ct80 J0 J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J6 J7 J8 ttbar Wenu Wtaunu Zee Zmumu Ztautau Monte Carlo Close to 50 samples for all the backgrounds and possible HV signals This is about 20 TB of ESDs We are responsible for saving this Currently using Exotics group space for this May soon have to find other places Still adding more data samples to the list

Tools And Docs

Standard TTree Production Everyone uses a standard TTree for actual analysis. Code is in Exotics Group SVN: Analysis/LongLived/HVHeavyFermionPairs Everyone uses a standard TTree for actual analysis*. Small little tool that makes plots of every leaf for x-checks

Documentation https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/HiddenValleyLongLived Provides a general reference to all the common work, including Triggers Data Sets TTree Versions and Source Code and location Description of the contents of the TTree. Background selection and elimination (like Line of Fire).

Outstanding Issues Still adding variables to the TTree Complete re-run of MC samples takes less than a week Private versions of TTree exist as people try new variables out Learning how to use common PAT tools and utilities Luminosity and GRL calculation Changes in trigger list generate constant work downstream

Conclusion Data production and management is in hand Small outstanding issues Adding new variables Re-production takes less than a week Common leap off point for rest of analysis Future At some point will move to experiment standard D3PD’s – perhaps for winter conferences Work on moving more analysis into AOD’s and reducing dependence on ESD format