Optimal Ways to learn about and communicate Evidence Based Medicine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Literacy: how to explain risk? Dr. Keiko Yasukawa University of Technology, Sydney.
Advertisements

Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Extension Article by Dr Tim Kenny
Diagnosing – Critical Activity HINF Medical Methodologies Session 7.
Kayla Potts Amber Presley J. Llanelly Paz Whitney Chislom “When Life Kicks You… Let It Kick You Forward! We Got Your BACK.” - Kay Yow.
Probability and inference General probability rules IPS chapter 4.5 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Communicating for a Knowledge Society
GENETIC TESTING: WHAT DOES IT REALLY TELL YOU? Lori L. Ballinger, MS, CGC Licensed Genetic Counselor University of New Mexico Cancer Center.
Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Weighing the Risks and Benefits Kathy J. Helzlsouer, M.D., M.H.S. Prevention and Research Center, Women’s.
1 MAMMOGRAPHY RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF THE BREAST Part 2 -Statistics A mammogram can find breast cancer when it is very small -- 2 to 3 years before you.
Health Disparities and Multicultural Practice Clarence H. Braddock III, MD, MPH, FACP Associate Professor of Medicine Associate Dean, Medical Education.
HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences.
Statistical test for Non continuous variables. Dr L.M.M. Nunn.
Understanding Medical Articles and Reports Linda Vincent, MPH UCSF Breast SPORE Advocate September 24,
Statistics for the board September 14 th 2007 Jean-Sebastien Rachoin MD.
Lecture: Forensic Evidence and Probability Characteristics of evidence Class characteristics Individual characteristics  features that place the item.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Be a Partner with Your Physician Stephen TePastte M.D. Medical Director MESSA.
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Discussing numerical data with patients. Framing Framing manipulations: describing equivalent choice situations in different ways Information on relative.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
What are the Chances Dr? Nick Pendleton. Can I have a Prostate Check? ?
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Epidemiological measureas. How do we determine disease frequency for a population?
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 4.4 Statistical Paradoxes LEARNING GOAL Investigate a few common paradoxes that arise in statistics, such as how.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
Chapter 9: Case Control Studies Objectives: -List advantages and disadvantages of case-control studies -Identify how selection and information bias can.
Study Design Descriptive Studies.
or items of information; these will be numbers in context
Communicating Risk.
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
Descriptive Epidemiology According to Person, Place, and Time
for Overall Prognosis Workshop Cochrane Colloquium, Seoul
Risk Perception and Communication
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
What do Women Know About Breast Density?
What is a Breast Test and Why do we go?
Informational Needs During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer:
Scientific Method notes and flow chart
Thomas Lumley Department of Statistics University of Auckland
Oncology for Family Medicine Residents:
Current Legal and Ethical Controversies in American Health Care
What Are Clinical Trials?
Cancer screening PROF .MAZIN AL-HAWAZ.
Thomas Lumley Department of Statistics University of Auckland
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Study Designs Hale Arık Taşyıkan, MD, MPH, Assist. Prof.
Quantitative Project Risk Analysis
MULTIMORBIDITY: THE MOST COMMON CHRONIC CONDITION
Prostate Cancer Awareness
Medical Diagnosis Problem
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
remember to round it to whole numbers
Lecture: Forensic Evidence and Probability Characteristics of evidence
1 Information Mastery Skills Calculating RR, RRR, ARR and NNTs A. Bornstein, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Weil Cornell Medical College New.
Project Title: Introduction Charts/Graphs/Pictures
Project Title: Introduction Charts/Graphs/Pictures
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Scenario 1 Joanne is writing to complain about her GP Dr Smith who examined her in April The reason Joanne went to see my GP was that she had a.
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Charts/Graphs/Pictures Significance/Background
Measures of Disease Occurrence
Making data provocative and personal
How People Respond to Risk
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Optimal Ways to learn about and communicate Evidence Based Medicine Misbah Keen, MD, MBI, MPH Matthew J. Thompson, MD, MPH, DPhil

The Problem EBM courses and programs exist at all levels of Medical Education Very few (if any) courses / programs result in behaviour change or practice improvement

Audience Exercise -1 Alice, a 45 year old woman with a positive screening mammogram asks your opinion about her chances of this actually being breast cancer. Mammography is 90% sensitive and 90% specific and the prevalence of breast cancer in her age group is 1%. 

Answer Multiple studies have looked at a similar question. 3 Countries Over 1000 physicians ranging from Residents to Department Chairs

Answer 95 % got the answer wrong (2% +/-) Vast majority of the wrong answers were 10 times more than the actual probability.

Use Natural Frequencies

After doing some reading, you find that for men of his age: Example Your father went to his doctor and was told that his test for a disease was positive. He is really worried, and comes to ask you for help! After doing some reading, you find that for men of his age: The prevalence of the disease is 30% The test has a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 90% “Son, tell me what’s the chance I have this disease?”

Prevalence of 30% Sensitivity of 50% Specificity of 90% 22 people test positive………. of whom 15 have the disease About 70% Disease +ve 15 30 100 Testing +ve 7 70 Disease -ve

Try it again A disease with a prevalence of 4% must be diagnosed. It has a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 90%. If the patient tests positive, what is the chance they have the disease?

Prevalence of 4% Sensitivity of 50% Specificity of 90% 11.6 people test positive… of whom 2 have the disease About 17% Disease +ve 2 4 100 Testing +ve 96 9.6 Disease -ve

Audience Exercise -2 Alice, a 45 year old woman with a positive screening mammogram asks your opinion about her chances of this actually being breast cancer. Mammography is 90% sensitive and 90% specific and the prevalence of breast cancer in her age group is 1%. 

Prevalence of 1% Sensitivity of 90% Specificity of 90% 108 people test positive… of whom 9 have the disease About 8.3 % Disease +ve 9 10 1000 Testing +ve 990 99 Disease -ve

Prevalence of 1% Sensitivity of 95% Specificity of 95% 59 people test positive… of whom 9.5 have the disease About 16 % Disease +ve 9.5 10 1000 Testing +ve 990 49.5 Disease -ve

Prognosis Odds Ratio

Therapeutics Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk Number Needed to Treat

Communicating Evidence

Audience Exercise - 1 Communicating Evidence

Communicating Evidence - Problems Physicians ask if patients have questions about treatments less than half the time Patient’s understanding of risks and benefits is “rare” Patients may not always “hear” what is being presented to them.

Communicating Evidence - Best Practices Use plain language to make written and verbal materials more understandable. Present data using absolute risks. Present information in pictographs if you are going to include graphs. Present data using frequencies.

Picture display of the benefits of 10 years of aspirin chemoprevention among 1,000 persons with a 10 percent 10-year global risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Green faces represent the number of patients who would not benefit because they are not among the 10 percent predicted to have a CHD-related event. The red faces represent the number of patients who would have an event despite taking aspirin. The yellow faces represent patients who would not have an event because they took aspirin (i.e., the number of patients who would benefit).

Communicating Evidence - Best Practices Use an incremental risk format to highlight how treatment changes risks from preexisting baseline levels. Be aware that the order in which risks and benefits are presented can affect risk perceptions. Consider using summary tables that include all of the risks and benefits for each treatment option.

Communicating Evidence - Best Practices Recognize that comparative risk information (eg, what the average person’s risk is) is persuasive and not just informative. Consider presenting only the information that is most critical to the patients’ decision making, even at the expense of completeness. Repeatedly draw patients’ attention to the time interval over which a risk occurs.

Shared Decision Tools http://shareddecisions.mayoclinic.org/ https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/index.html

Audience Exercise - 2 Communicating Evidence