Heather Ridolfo, Virginia Harris and Emilola Abayomi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do Economic and Demographic Characteristics Differ between Web and Mail Respondents to the 2005 Census of Agriculture Content Test? By Nancy J. Dickey.
Advertisements

“... providing timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture.” Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Survey Questionnaires Heather Ridolfo,
UNESCAP Project on Disability Statistics Field testing protocol.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Overview of Data Quality Issues in MICS.
1 21ST SESSION OF AFRICAN COMMSION FOR AGRICULTURE STATISTICS WORKSHOPWORKSHOP HELD IN ACCRA, GHANA, 28 – 31 OCTOBER 2009 By Lubili Marco Gambamala National.
Factors contributing to inadequate solid waste management in Nairobi: A case study of Kawangware.
Like – But Oh, How Different: The effect of different questionnaire formats in the 2005 Census of Agriculture Content Test. Jaki S. McCarthy National Agricultural.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 15.
MEADOW Questionnaire Validation G. Sirilli & A. Arundel.
Brandi Kirkland and Skyla Forrester. Is Instruction the Answer? Purpose for identifying the problem is to determine whether instruction should be part.
MEASURING ASSET OWNERSHIP FROM A GENDER PERSPECTIVE CURRENT AND FUTURE PLANS James Muwonge and Norah Madaya Uganda Bureau of Statistics EDGE Project: Bangkok,
© Federal Statistical Office of Germany In-depth review on Time use surveys Presentation by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany Bernd Stoertzbach,
Workshop on Passenger Mobility Conclusions. EU data requirements – DG MOVE  Environmental, economic and social considerations require close monitoring.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Core and Supplementary Agricultural Topics Section A 1.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
Lesson objective To understand how to draw and write up a questionnaire Success criteria: Build – discuss what makes a good question in a questionnaire.
United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Revising the Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses New York, 29 October – 1 November.
CENSUS AND TECHNOLOGY Presented by Dr. Muhammad Hanif 1.
Miami, Florida, 9 – 12 November 2016
Please get out materials for notes.
Quality Assurance in Population and Housing Censuses
The Effects of Prelisted Items in Business Survey Questionnaire Tables
Short Training Course on Agricultural Cost of Production Statistics
Lecture 23 Collecting Primary data through Questionnare
Jennifer Crafts, Westat Audrey Kindlon, National Science Foundation,
The Association of Exposure to Adverse
Allocation of costs in complex cropping and mixed farming systems
Merja Kallio-Peltoniemi QDET2/12th November 2016
Evaluating Survey Data Collection Methods
The Gender Asset Gap Project in Ghana
Current status of the planning of the AC
Progress towards a table builder with in-built disclosure control for 2021 Census Keith Spicer UNECE, 22 September 2017.
Sturgeon awareness in Bulgaria (Marketing research results)
UNECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing
Qualitative and Quantitative Data
About Market Research Making a Questionnaire
MINI-SPEC REFERENDUM April 2010 Report
Dr J Frost GCSE: Data Collection Dr J Frost Last.
Data quality 1: Individual records
Population and Housing Census of Nepal: History, Lessons learned, and Initial planning for 2021 census Mahesh Kumar Subedi & Prakash Poudyal Central Bureau.
Operational Agility in the American Community Survey: The Promise of Administrative Records Victoria Velkoff and Jennifer Ortman American Community Survey.
Chapter 1 Data Analysis Section 1.2
SPEC Barometer Results
Multi-Mode Data Collection Approach
Data Gaps By Dr. Grace Bediako Government Statistician
Warm up – Unit 4 Test – Financial Analysis
ENGENDERING POPULATION CENSUS
Day 3. How to Measure.
Use of handheld electronic devices for data collection in GeoStat
Production of gender statistics workshop New Delhi 6th-10th August
Social media as market research
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Overview of Approaches to Register-Based Populating Censuses
ENGENDERING POPULATION CENSUS
Session 7 – Eurostat 2017 SBR User Survey
Qualtrics for data collection
Integrating Gender into Population and Housing Censuses
Marketing Research: Course 4
Multi-Mode Data Collection Approach
Financial literacy in ASIA: Some highlights of the OECD/INFE Survey on Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion Adele Atkinson, Senior Policy Analyst,
Implementing mixed mode questionnaire in FI-SILC
Welcome L3 Numeracy Bridging
Section 12.1: Significance Tests in Practice
Collecting time use data
Indicator 3.05 Interpret marketing information to test hypotheses and/or to resolve issues.
Research organizations
MIMOD – Project overview
Multi-Mode Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

Challenges to Developing New Survey Questions: When Cultural Norms Run Counter to Survey Questions Heather Ridolfo, Virginia Harris and Emilola Abayomi National Agricultural Statistics Service

Farm Operators Measure farm operators to assess: Demographics of farmers Changes in structure of farming Assess potential future issues Assess USDA programs “Principal” Operator key for understanding the economic well-being of the farm household

Women Operators Concern over underreporting of women farmers on the Census of Agriculture In the 2012 Census of Agriculture: 30% all operators were women 14% all principal operators were women Decline in female operators 2007-2012 (not significant)

Panel on Women in Agriculture Changing farm structure Cultural norms (farms are operated by men) Panel Recommendations: Remove labels (operator, principal operator) Ask about involvement in variety of decisions, allow for joint involvement Allow up to 4 operators Transition away from principal operator; allow respondents to report more than one

Changes to the Questionnaire 2012 COA 2015 Content Test

Principal Operator 2012 COA 2015 Content Test

Changes to the Questionnaire

Pre-Testing Methods Cognitive interviewing Round 1 (n=8) 2015 Content Test (n=~30,000)

Total Number of Individuals Capturing involvement in variety of decisions Broad range of decision types considered Day-to-day decisions Major decisions All decision types Broad range in level of involvement Involved in majority/all decisions Involved in one or some decisions Providing input Making decisions/being final decision maker

Total Number of Individuals Still undercounts of women “We always argue her down” “She just does the bookkeeping” “The Bible says he’s in charge”

Number of Men and Women Redundancy and missing data Some respondents felt these questions were redundant Majority of the time responses to Question 2 summed to response to Question 1 Respondents with no female operators sometimes left women response space blank

Principal Operator Data reported are inconsistent (operating jointly = checked yes for all operators, checked no for all operators, or left blank) Difficult to bridge because concept has changed

2015 Content Test Sample approximately 30,000 Sample targeted to include operations so all sections of form would be tested Self-administered paper form, limited CATI and Web Data collection Jan-April 2016

Total Number of Operators Consistency of total operators reported and number of men and women reported Count % of total reports Consistent 11105 95.26 Not Consistent 552 4.74

Total Number of Operators Consistency of numbers reported in total question and number of operators reported in the demographic table Count % of total reports Consistent 10290 88.27 Not Consistent 1367 11.73

2015 Content Test: Principal Operator Total Number of Principal Operators Reported Count % of total reports 3060 0.26 1 5574 0.48 2 2788 0.24 3 160 0.01 4 75 0.00

2015 Content Test: Principal Operator Number of Principal Operators Number of Operators 1 2 3 4 767 297 84 672 3550 15 625 1504 2438 63 157 169 137 40 55 59 13 5+ 30 28 7

Matched Records for 2012 COA and 2015 Content Test   2012 Census 2015 Content Test Sum Mean Total Operators 11627 1.27 13955 1.52 Women 3643 0.40 4967 0.54 Men 7984 0.87 9288 1.01 Men reported in columns 8765 8989 Women reported in columns 3763 4519

Conclusion Cultural norms persist (women still underreported) Small changes to questionnaire brought small improvement to reporting of women operators

Questions Heather Ridolfo heather.ridolfo@nass.usda.gov Virgina Harris virginia.harris@nass.usda.gov Emilola J. Abayomi emilola.abayomi@nass.usda.gov