Capacity Conversion – 616s

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms for the European Gas Transmission Network Benoît Esnault, CRE Presentation Workshop Ljubljana,
Advertisements

EU Implementation Programme Action TR1003: All to consider how to address EU developments going forward and send any identified issues to:
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
UNC Mod 485: CMP-LTUIOLI Progress Update 3 April 2014.
European Developments: Capacity Transmission Workgroup 6th October 2011.
EU Workgroup – Mod 500 WG(4) – 16 th September 2014.
EU Workgroup – Mod 500 Action 703 – confirm current capacity surrender process.
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Framework Guideline (Pilot) Dr. Stefanie Neveling, ACER Workstream Co-Chair Walter Boltz, ACER.
EU Gas Balancing Code – Nomination Update [Revised to reflect action TX1002] Action TX1002: EU Balancing Code/Nominations: Provide an overview of what.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Implementation of Trades and Transfers National Grid NTS 5 th June 2008.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
Trades and Transfers Workshop, 6 th November 2007.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
1 24 th November 2015 Videoconference 34 th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
Pre-mod discussion: Treatment of Capacity at Combined ASEPs
Public Consultation : main conclusions (1/2)
Enagás and REN Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms 15 November th SG meeting.
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
25th IG meeting 13th December 2013
Enagás and TIGF Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms 15 November th SG meeting.
EU Tariffs Code Update Based on Refined Draft as of 30th October
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
Review of Demand Estimation Times for Modification Proposal 461
20th April 2016 Teleconference
Distribution Workgroup 24/11/16
EU Implementation Programme
26th IG meeting 23th January 2014
CMP Transparency Requirements
20th April 2016 Teleconference
Removal of a Users ability to allow Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity to lapse Chris Shanley.
Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms (Reg.984/2013)
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
RRC arrangements for Storage sites
20th April 2016 Teleconference
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Mod CMC_03_18 Unique circumstances may arise whereby the Transmission System Operator or Distribution System Operator requires additional time to formulate.
UNC Modification – Non Effective Days
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Assignment Workshop 2 16th September 09, Solihull.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Mod 0452 (PARCA) – Further thoughts
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
EU/GB Charging Project – Delivery Timescales
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Simon Trivella –5th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification 501 slides for Workgroup
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Transmission Workstream – Partial Assignment
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Transmission Workstream - EU 3rd Package Update
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

Capacity Conversion – 616s 1st June 17

Recap Purpose: to provide a process for converting unbundled capacity into bundled capacity in compliance with the amended EU CAM code for the 1st Jan 18. ENTSOG consultation on capacity conversion model launched on 14th April. Closed out 5th May. NG will adhere to the ENTSOG model, but will consider interpretation that falls within the generic model. (Tx WG action ref 0502) NG will review modification proposal in light of any changes to the ENTSOG model.

Proposed changes to ENTSOG model after consultation Topic Old model Revised model Capacity Products Annual, quarterly and monthly only Annual, quarterly and monthly ... voluntary offer of daily services at a National level. Eligible Capacity Contracted capacity before 1st Nov 15. For unbundled capacity...specific conditions under which service may be limited (e.g. only capacity < 1st Nov 15) may be proposed by TSOs subject to NRA approval. Deadlines n/a Request to be received by TSOs 3 days after the auction. Responses to be received by the shipper 3 days after submission.

Available Capacity with Adjacent TSO Original proposal was to offer a capacity conversion service when there was insufficient unbundled capacity offered by the adjacent TSO. NG now propose to amend this. Availability of unbundled capacity with the adjacent TSO will not form part of commercial validation process. This is no issue with the ENTSOG model, as the model is silent on this matter. This is in response to WG feedback, and satisfies Tx WG action ref 0501. NG will monitor applications, against availability of unbundled capacity from adjacent TSO (not mod rule).

Capacity Products NG proposed solution is for annual, quarterly and monthly products only. This is in line with CAM and the ENTSOG model. Daily products are a matter of national discretion. NG will support the development of a daily service modification, if a party raises such a proposal. Considerations would be: systems impact (automating process to make sure capacity is available for next auction). timelines for delivery. Cost/benefit of service (assess against relevant objectives other than g)

Capacity Validation: ‘Sufficient’ Capacity Mod states that NG NTS shall perform a capacity check to ensure that the shipper user holds sufficient capacity. To clarify what is meant by sufficient: Shipper shall hold an unbundled capacity amount* equal to or more than the amount submitted for capacity conversion. Shipper shall hold the amount for the entire period (being annual, quarterly or monthly) that is covered in the request. *subject to further consideration, the capacity amount will either be the capacity entitlements or the registered capacity holdings.

Capacity Validation: Legacy Capacity Why ‘legacy only’ option: in theory this is a transition issue. New IP capacity is offered as bundled, except for remedying existing contractual mismatches, so issue will naturally go away. process will have a natural end date. Why ‘any unbundled’ option (legacy & non-legacy): no legal basis to restrict to legacy only. shippers may end up with unbundled capacity due to processes that potentially unbundle, such as Surrender and Buyback, even though bundled capacity was originally purchased.

Capacity Validation: Legacy Capacity & Trading Can ‘traded in’ capacity be converted, or should the service be limited to the shipper who paid the TSO for the capacity? to allow conversion of traded in capacity, NG can validate requests against a shipper’s firm unbundled entitlements. to prevent conversion of traded in capacity, NG can validate requests against a shipper’s firm unbundled Registered holdings. Enforcement of ‘legacy only’ capacity can only practically be done by checking registered capacity holdings. alternative is to try and split entitlements into ‘legacy’ and ‘non-legacy’, which from both a commercial rules and systems point of view creates undue complexity.

Next Steps 3 feasible options regarding rules for legacy capacity and trading. Option Legacy or Unbundled Validate against Registered Capacity or net Entitlements Allow conversion of traded in cap. 1 Legacy Only Registered No 2 Any Unbundled 3 Entitlements Yes Industry feedback sought on options. Additionally NG will be engaging with Xoserve regarding the whole process, including above options. Considering information received in above 2 points, NG will bring a firm proposal to next WG.