Alexithymia in eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale Heather Westwood, Jess Kerr-Gaffney, Daniel Stahl, Kate Tchanturia Journal of Psychosomatic Research Volume 99, Pages 66-81 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Systematic review search process. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Funnel plot of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) studies included in the meta-analysis to assess for publication bias. Each dot represents a study included in the meta-analysis, with the Y axis representing the size of each study and the X axis, each study's result. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Funnel plot of Anorexia Nervosa, Restricting subtype (AN-R) studies included in the meta-analysis to assess for publication bias. Each dot represents a study included in the meta-analysis, with the Y axis representing the size of each study and the X axis, each study's result. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Funnel plot of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Purge subtype (AN-BP) studies included in the meta-analysis to assess for publication bias. Each dot represents a study included in the meta-analysis, with the Y axis representing the size of each study and the X axis, each study's result. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Funnel plot of Bulimia Nervosa (BN) studies included in the meta-analysis to assess for publication bias. Each dot represents a study included in the meta-analysis, with the Y axis representing the size of each study and the X axis, each study's result. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 6 Funnel plot of Binge Eating Disorder (BED) studies included in the meta-analysis to assess for publication bias. Each dot represents a study included in the meta-analysis, with the Y axis representing the size of each study and the X axis, each study's result. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 7 Forest plot of mean TAS score: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Healthy Controls. CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 8 Forest plot of mean TAS score: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Anorexia Nervosa, Restricting subtype (AN-R) and Healthy Controls (HC) and between Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Purge subtype (AN-BP) and HCs. CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 9 Forest plot of mean TAS score: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Healthy Controls. CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 10 Forest plot of mean TAS score: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Binge Eating Disorder (BED) and Healthy Controls. CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 11 Forest plot of mean TAS subscale scores: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Healthy Controls (HC). CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 12 Forest plot of mean TAS subscale scores: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Anorexia Nervosa, Restricting subtype (AN-R) and Healthy Controls (HC). CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 13 Forest plot of mean TAS subscale scores: standardized mean effect size for differences (SMD) between Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Healthy Controls (HC). CI, confidence interval. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2017 99, 66-81DOI: (10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.007) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions