How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ University of Arkansas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.
Advertisements

Benefits and Liabilities Associated with Early Maturity and Determinacy in Cotton.
ACGA Seed Development Committee Started in 2001 Crossing nursery in 2001, 2002, & 2003 Evaluation nursery in 2005, & lines in ACGA advanced trials.
UW MADISON AGRONOMY Rotation Effect on Brown Stem Rot and Soybean Yield P. Pedersen, C.R. Grau, and J.G. Lauer UW-Madison September 14, 2000.
Cotton. Leading Countries 1.China 1.China 2.USA 2.USA 3.India 3.India 4.Pakistan 4.Pakistan 5.Uzbekistan 5.Uzbekistan.
Seed Quality Variety life span. Value Shifts Continue No longer just a seed… Planting unit Technology Vigor Protection Fiber Quality Additional Traits.
Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems Michael Patterson, Bob Goodman and Dale.
Defoliation, Harvest, and Cotton Quality…. Philip Jost University of Georgia.
1 New Varieties and US Cotton Quality Kenneth B. Hood Chairman of the National Cotton Council H.B. Hood and Sons Gin & Perthshire Farms Gunnison, MS Kenneth.
Dr. Lelisa J. Teodosio Aklan State University Banga, Aklan, Philippines Co-Researchers: Dr. Geronimo L. Gregorio, Dr. Elsa I. Abayon, Dr. Cora F. Navarra,
C.W. Bednarz and W.D. Shurley University of Georgia and W.S. Anthony USDA-ARS Losses in Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton From Improper Harvest.
Managing Difficult to Control Tarnished Plant Bugs Jeff Gore – USDA-ARS, Stoneville.
Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics Module I Course on Insect Pests of Groundnut About Groundnut Next There are 11 multiple choice questions in this.
Louisiana Variety Testing 2010 SCC-33/UCTA St. Pete Beach, FL January 26-29, 2010 Rick Mascagni Northeast Research Station St. Joseph, LA.
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission PERFORMANCE OF PHYTOGEN ™ COTTONSEED VARIETIES EXPRESSING WIDESTRIKE ™ INSECT PROTECTION IN 2006 STRIP.
DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL.
UGA Cotton Extension Program Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist University of Georgia Tifton, GA.
Impact of Fall Armyworm Survival in Bt Crops on Survival and Damage Potential of Subsequent Generations Ryan Jackson USDA-ARS SIMRU.
Cotton Breeding At Auburn University
VARIETYLINT/ACRELENGTHMIKE Deltapine DP555BG/RR 1038** Deltapine DPLX99X * Phytogen PH98M * Sure Grow 501BR 944*
Impact of a Saw-type Lint Cleaner’s operation on Fiber Quality Sanh Le, Ph. D. Cotton Ginning Laboratory Stoneville, MS.
Reproducibility of check cultivar performance as affected by seed source by Jimmy X. Zumba and Gerald O. Myers Department of Agronomy and Environmental.
UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program.
Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Cotton Varieties and Fiber Quality Selecting Cotton Varieties for 2003 Steve Brown and Philip Jost.
Lu Feng Plant and Soil Science Department Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, quality and within-boll yield.
Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth Response To Dicamba R. D. Wallace, A. S. Culpepper, W. K. Vencill, A. C. York, and T. L. Grey University of Georgia.
Conservation Tillage in Cotton: A Mississippi Delta Perspective
Harvesting cotton in Australia
EVALUATION OF PLANT GROWTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS ON LOW DESERT COTTON
2011 VIRGINIA COTTON VARIETY SUMMARY
2017 Cotton Agronomic Update
Giant Ragweed Control in Cotton
Long-term crop rotations suppress soybean sudden death
Software to Simulate Genomic Selection
2017 – Year in Review Cotton prices stronger relative to competing crops Large world production & ending stocks Growth in world GDP Increased demand for.
Jenny Clement Koebernick
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
The Impact of Planting Date on Fiber and Yarn Quality
High Temperature and Cotton Yield Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
Roundup Ready Technology
Impacts of cattle on cotton in a bahiagrass/peanut/cotton rotation
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
Beltwide Cotton Conference Cotton Agronomy & Physiology Section
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
Agronomic Evaluation of At-Plant Insecticides and Nematicides
Cotton Variety Management – DeltaPine
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
NCSU OVT 2014 (Edmisten)Statistically highest group
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
Understanding Multi-Environment Trials
Effect of Planting Pattern on Cotton Growth and Yield
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
Estimating cotton yield and net revenue
2018 UGA OFT Cotton Varieties (14)
UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program
ACGA Seed Development Committee
Optimizing Revenue Through Defoliation Timing
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
What is Early Maturity and Determinacy?
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
Products of Crowley’s Ridge
KEY CONCEPT Cells work together to carry out complex functions.
The Effects of Defoliation Timing and Ethephon Rate on Harvest Date, Lint Yield, and Fiber Quality of Cotton Guy Collins, Keith Edmisten, James Lanier,
Presentation transcript:

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ University of Arkansas Fred Bourland, University of Arkansas All cotton varieties are winners, BUT may not be adapted to your specific environment! Specific adaptation due to subtle varietal differences. Primary focus on cotton varieties grown in Arkansas, similar to other Delta states.

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Major Factors that Differ Transgenes Yield by location Maturity Yield components Pubescence Host plant resistance Fiber quality www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com (results for all crops)

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Transgenes in Arkansas Cotton Year B2RF B2XF LL-B2,G,T WRF Other 2010 88.0 - 9.0 3.0 2011 87.6 0.6 10.2 1.6 2012 68.5 15.8 12.5 3.2 2013 51.0 34.2 14.4 2014 23.4 70.9 5.7 2015 8.8 11.1 73.8 6.3 2016 0.4 55.7 20.2 22.8 1.0

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 - Arkansas r 2016 (% ac) 2015 (% ac) 2014 (% ac) 2013 (% ac) 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) ST 4946 GLB2 (52.6%) ST 4946 GLB2 (48.1%) FM 1944 GLB2 (16.4%) 2 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) ST 4747 GLB2 (17.4%) FM 1944 GLB2 (15.2%) ST 5458 B2F (15.9%) 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) PHY 333 WRF (4.65%) ST 5458 B2F (8.68%) DP 0912 B2RF (9.97%) 4 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) DP 1518 B2XF (3.76%) DP 0912 B2RF (6.17%) PHY 499 WRF (9.02%) 5 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) DP 1522 B2XF (3.76%) PHY 499 WRF (5.11%) ST 4145 LLB2 (6.92%) Sum = 84.9% Sum = 82.2% Sum = 83.3% Sum = 58.2%

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 – Arkansas: Maturity Rk,ac Variety (% ac.) Plant Ht (in.) % Open bolls 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) 44.8 (17) 57 (21) 2 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) 40.6 (33) 68 (2) 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) 46.1 (9) 62 (11) 4 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) 42.5 (28) 62 (13) 5 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) 46.1 (10) 64 (9) Variety x Location *** www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com 35 transgenic varieties in 2016

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 – Arkansas: Lint yield Rk,ac Variety (% ac.) Lint yield, All loc Man.,Sand Kei., Clay J. H., Vert. Mar., mid. Roh., s.Ark., lb/a (rank) Rank by location 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) 1220 (4) 24 31 2 6 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) 1059 (29) 32 25 17 26 27 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) 1191 (9) 8 18 4 22 7 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) 1203 (5) 15 12 5 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) 1284 (1) Variety x Location *** www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com 35 transgenic varieties in 2016

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 – Arkansas: Yield components Rk Variety (% ac.) Lint yld L% SI LI SPA FPS Fden ac. lb/a (rk) Ranks 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) 1220 (4) 29 18 30 2 16 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) 1059 (29) 25 9 13 27 10 11 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) 1191 (9) 7 14 5 4 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) 1203 (5) 28 12 26 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) 1284 (1) 6 Variety x Location *** ns * ** www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com 35 transgenic varieties in 2016

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 – Ark.: Host plant resistance Rk Variety (% ac.) Lint yld Lpub Spub Btri TPB BB ac. lb/a (rk) rate #/cm %dam %sus 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) 1220 (4) 3.3 6.0 59.0 35 (4) 2 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) 1059 (29) 1.5 4.9 52.7 37 (8) 49 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) 1191 (9) 3.9 58.7 51 (28) 50 4 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) 1203 (5) 3.2 4.5 55.2 30 (2) 55 5 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) 1284 (1) 3.8 59.3 36 (7) 23 Variety x Location *** n/a www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com 35 transgenic varieties in 2016

Fiber quality – less trash Less leaf pubescence on smooth-leaf & semi-smooth varieties If experience good leaf defoliation, most of trash in ginned cotton is bract tissue. Density of marginal bract trichomes varies among hairy and smooth leaf varieties. Visually rate leaf (& stem) pubescence using scale of 1 (smooth) to 9 (pilose)

How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ Dominant Varieties in 2016 – Arkansas: Fiber quality Rk Variety (% ac.) Lint yield QS Mic Len UI Str Elo ac. lb/a (rk) in. % g/tex 1 DP 1518 B2XF (29.9%) 1220 (4) 72 4.3 1.22 86.8 30.5 6.5 2 NG 3406 B2XF (18.0%) 1059 (29) 54 4.5 1.16 85.9 30.4 7.8 3 PHY 333 WRF (14.5%) 1191 (9) 1.23 86.3 30.3 6.3 4 ST 4946 GLB2 (14.2%) 1203 (5) 59 4.8 1.19 86.0 33.3 6.7 5 PHY 312 WRF (8.3%) 1284 (1) 71 86.9 31.9 Variety x Location *** ns ** www.ArkansasVarietyTesting.com 35 transgenic varieties in 2016

Varieties Expressing Both High Yield and High Fiber Quality Variety Yield r QS Mic Len UI Str Elo 2016 Arkansas Transgenic Variety Test (35 entries) PHY 312 WRF 1284 1 71 8 4.5 29 1.22 10 86.9 5 31.9 9 6.3 30 PHY 444 WRF 1244 2 81 4.0 35 1.27 87.1 31.2 19 6.8 DP 1646 B2XF 1242 3 84 26 86.1 14 30.5 24 7.3 11 DP 1518 B2XF 1220 4 72 7 4.3 33 86.8 6 6.5 25 PHY 333 WRF 1191 34 1.23 86.3 30.3 28 BX 1737 GLT 1159 16 75 4.6 20 1.24 31.6 15 7.2 12 2016 Arkansas Conventional Variety Test (10 entries) Ark 0701-17 1098 68 86.4 32.6 6.4 SSG UA 222 1010 67 4.7 85.6 33.4 8.0 AM UA48 935 86 5.2 1.32 88.6 36.9 5.1 SSG UA 103 932 1.25 33.9 6.9

Cotton Breeding Dr. R.R. (Bob) Bridge (1939-1999): “Cotton breeding is like trying to get a bunch of monkeys up a tree. About the time you have all of them there, one will fall (or jump) out.”