Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
Advertisements

Sound test. Signals and waveforms What is a signal? Need not be electrical Morse Speech Video Contains information.
This lesson covers the following outcomes Unit 54 P1, P7, P8 Unit 6 P10, P11.
IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.
FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Observation. Defining Behavior page 192 Topography Function Characteristics Duration Latency Frequency Amplitude.
Physics 434 Module 3 – Created by (and thanks to) T. Burnett 1 Physics 434 Module 3 Acoustic excitation of a physical system.
1 Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting June 20, 2007.
Physics 434 Module 3 - T. Burnett 1 Physics 434 Module 3 Acoustic excitation of a physical system.
Automation of the 805MHz cavity conditioning procedure Ajit Kurup MuCool Test Area RF Workshop, Fermilab 22 nd August 2007.
Sample servo diagrams and Bode plots. Acousto optic performance plots Unlock servo Measure gain and phase vs drive input K.
EE 198 B Senior Design Project. Spectrum Analyzer.
Magnitude and Phase Measurements
Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector
Physics 434 Module 3 - T. Burnett 1 Physics 434 Module 3 Acoustic excitation of a physical system.
PI laser jitter measurements Data taken on 11 th April 2013.
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: Cables Measurements Student Meeting Jose Luis Sirvent PhD. Student 22/07/2013.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
93 SOURCE TIME SERIES VOCAL TRACT TRANSFER FUNCTION VOICE TIME SERIES VOICE SPECTRUM SOURCE TIME SERIES VOCAL TRACT TRANSFER FUNCTION VOICE TIME SERIES.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
Network Analyzers From Small Signal To Large Signal Measurements
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
HBD FEE test result summary + production schedule 16mv test pulse result –5X attenuator + 20:1 resistor divider at input (to reduce the noise on the test.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
1 SiPM studies: Highlighting current equipment and immediate plans Lee BLM Quasar working group.
Calibration summary Nov-Dec 09 R Apsimon. 10 Nov 09 Note, the power rail on the FONT5 board wasn’t working properly and so there is no good quality information.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
Tests of STO IF Components S. Weinreb April 15, 2009 Two 1-2 GHz IF amplifier plates and one 5 GHz converter plate for the Texas test flight have been.
#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.
FONT Meeting1 3-BPM resolution with digital filtering N. Blaskovic.
CALIBRATIONS IPBPM FILTER TESTS Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich Friday, 1 May Talitha Bromwich, FONT Group Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
BASIC INSTRUMENTS - oscilloscopes
Physics 434 Module 4 - T. Burnett 1 Physics 434 Module 4 Acoustic excitation of a physical system: time domain.
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
© 2015, Cornell Bioacoustics Research Program Are Raven’s dB measurements SPL? By default, Raven’s dB measurements are relative to an arbitrary reference.
30GHz system improvements Jan Kovermann RF meeting
S-band processing electronics R. Ainsworth (summer student), S. Boogert, G. Boorman (Royal Holloway) A. Lyapine (University College London) Weekly ATF2.
Chapter 8 © Copyright 2007 Prentice-HallElectric Circuits Fundamentals - Floyd Chapter 8.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
Timing and synchronisation J. Jones, A. Moss and E.W. Snedden April/May 2015.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Commissioning of the Crystal evaluation setup
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich & G. Christian
Revised ATF Shift Plans
MERIT beam intensities
Electric Circuits Fundamentals
A Portion of the SCP RF Control System LCLS Related
Phase Monitor Electronics: Output vs
Power Factor Uncertainty or The Design Engineer’s Challenge
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Electronics Fundamentals
Progress Report: Noise Storms and Beam Splitter Oscillations
LO BOX and LO/CLK DISTRIBUTION Arash Kaftoosian ESS Bilbao, May 2018.
Zhiyi Chi, Daniel Margoliash  Neuron 
Slow-γ Rhythms Coordinate Cingulate Cortical Responses to Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples during Wakefulness  Miguel Remondes, Matthew A. Wilson  Cell.
Dayashankar Dubey (MTech)
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Contents Monitoring the glitches of the 714-to-357 MHz frequency divider: set-up and results The effect of the use of Colin’s filter to reduce glitching N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 1 22/04/12 00:56 (onwards) KEY N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting Doug’s original set-up SET-UP 1 22/04/12 00:56 (onwards) BNC 18 “kicker pre trigger” fanout scope CH1 (trigger) BNC 16 LO box (In  Out Raw) scope CH2 20 16 Φ/2 (2008) scope CH3 Φ/2 (2011) scope CH4 KEY Power splitter 1.5 Hz Amplifier (dBm) Φ/2 Frequency divider (year) 714 MHz Attenuator (dBm) Colin’s filter 357 MHz N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 1 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting Data collection (Doug’s scope DAQ): only the value of CH2, CH3 & CH4 at the sampling index (shown by the circles) are logged for each acquisition (approx. every second) Voltage of CH2, CH3 & CH4 vs. time for an acquisition: N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 1 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting 20 glitches in CH4 (no filter) over the first 17500 acquisitions 0 glitches in CH3 (with filter) over the first 17500 acquisitions ‘Slipping’ of CH2, CH3 & CH4 relative to CH1 trigger evident for acquisitions 17500-43000 Plot of sampled CH2, CH3 & CH4 voltages vs. acquisition number: 6 h (0.8 acq/s) N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 2 22/04/12 17:52 (onwards) KEY Freq. dividers interchanged BNC 18 “kicker pre trigger” fanout scope CH1 (trigger) BNC 16 LO box (In  Out Raw) scope CH2 20 16 Φ/2 (2011) scope CH3 Freq. dividers interchanged Φ/2 (2008) scope CH4 KEY Power splitter 1.5 Hz Amplifier (dBm) Φ/2 Frequency divider (year) 714 MHz Attenuator (dBm) Colin’s filter 357 MHz N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 2 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting No glitching recorded in either CH3 or CH4 (over around 4 hours) ‘Slipping’ of CH2, CH3 & CH4 relative to CH1 trigger evident Voltage of CH2, CH3 & CH4 vs. time for an acquisition at 18:17 (FONT PC time): Sampling close to CH2, CH3 & CH4 peak N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 2 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting No glitching recorded in either CH3 or CH4 (over around 4 hours) ‘Slipping’ of CH2, CH3 & CH4 relative to CH1 trigger evident Voltage of CH2, CH3 & CH4 vs. time for an acquisition at 18:51 (FONT PC time): 34 minutes later, the sampling point is no longer sampling CH2, CH3 or CH4 peaks! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 2 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting Possible sources of ‘slipping’ of CH2-4 relative to CH1 trigger: Phase drift of the 1.5 Hz trigger relative to the 714 MHz Varying shape of the falling edge of the 1.5 Hz pulse wobbly CH1 (trigger) N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 23/04/12 01:17 (onwards) KEY CH3 used as trigger N. Blaskovic BNC 16 LO box (In  Out Raw) scope CH2 20 16 Φ/2 (2011) scope CH3 (trigger) CH3 used as trigger Φ/2 (2008) scope CH4 KEY Power splitter Amplifier (dBm) Φ/2 Frequency divider (year) 714 MHz Attenuator (dBm) Colin’s filter 357 MHz N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting This set-up allows a clear count of glitches. Left running overnight, the number of acquisitions collected was 230412. Number of glitches (in CH4): 2022 Plot of sampled CH2, CH3 & CH4 voltages vs. acquisition number: 13 h (5 acq/s) N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting Zoom in... Plot of sampled CH2, CH3 & CH4 voltages vs. acquisition number: N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting Zoom in further... Glitching on occasions occurs between consecutive acquisitions, with an acquisition rate of 5 acq/s Plot of sampled CH2, CH3 & CH4 voltages vs. acquisition number: N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting But glitches in CH3 (with filter) are indistinguishable from glitches in CH4 (no filter): Glitch in CH3 Given that CH3 is set as trigger, CH2 (714 MHz) is shifted through a whole period CH3 (357 MHz, filter) does not glitch, as it is acting as the trigger CH4 (357 MHz, no filter) apparently glitches, due to the glitch in CH3 (trigger) N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 3 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting But glitches in CH3 (with filter) are indistinguishable from glitches in CH4 (no filter): Glitch in CH4 Given that CH3 is set as trigger, CH2 (714 MHz) undergoes no change CH3 (357 MHz, filter) undergoes no change CH4 (357 MHz, no filter) glitches N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 4 23/04/12 15:50 (onwards) KEY Initial set-up; no filters BNC 18 “kicker pre trigger” fanout scope CH1 (trigger) BNC 16 LO box (In  Out Raw) scope CH2 20 16 Φ/2 (2008) scope CH3 Initial set-up; no filters Φ/2 (2011) scope CH4 KEY Power splitter 1.5 Hz Amplifier (dBm) Φ/2 Frequency divider (year) 714 MHz Attenuator (dBm) Colin’s filter 357 MHz N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

SET-UP 4 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting 1 glitch in CH4 (2011 frequency divider, no filter) 0 glitches in CH3 (2008 frequency divider, no filter) Plot of sampled CH2, CH3 & CH4 voltages vs. acquisition number: 2 h 20 min (0.8 acq/s) N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Summary The 357 MHz signal coming out of the frequency divider does glitch Glitching occurs as often as every 0.2 s Rate of glitching varies throughout the day Colin’s filter reduces the occurrence of glitches: not a single glitch was recorded when using the filter N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Epilogue: a single slide on kicker gain matrices N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Comparison of kicker gain matrices: December 2011 – April 2012 P2 P3 GainDec* = K1 -3478 476 K2 889 -2341 Gain18AprCal2** = -8243 759 2034 -4741 Gain18AprCal2 ./ GainDec = 2.37 1.59 2.29 2.03 * final kicker calibration, as used for fbRun6,7,8_Board1_coupled_141211 ** kicker calibration 2 on 190412 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting