Higher rate of antiretroviral therapy reinitiation among HIV-HBV coinfected patients in the episodic arm of the SMART study Dore G.1, Soriano V.2, Neuhaus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antiretroviral Therapy: An HIV Prevention Strategy? Wafaa El-Sadr, MD, MPH Columbia University Harlem Hospital New York.
Advertisements

Recommendations of BU/HIV expert panel influenced by results from Akonolinga All BU patients should be offered quality provider-initiated HIV testing and.
Monica Gandhi MD, MPH Associate Professor and Women’s HIV Clinic provider, HIV/AIDS Division San Francisco General Hospital/ UCSF Safe Poz Love, U.S. Positive.
BORDERNETwork Training on HIV and HBV Co-Infections Dr. med. Wolfgang Güthoff / Alexander Leffers, M.A.
Mortality and causes of death among women living with HIV in the UK in the era of highly-active antiretroviral therapy Sara Croxford, A Kitching, M Kall,
PEPFAR Hepatitis B co-infection and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-infected Patients in Tanzania Oral abstract # MOAB0101 C. Hawkins, B.
1 Lauren E. Finn, 2 Seth Sheffler-Collins, MPH, 2 Marcelo Fernandez-Viña, MPH, 2 Claire Newbern, PhD, 1 Dr. Alison Evans, ScD., 1 Drexel University School.
HIV Early Treatment Project Groups 1 and 2 n Among HIV-infected participants in sub-Saharan Africa, does initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) at.
HIV-1 DNA levels after antiretroviral therapy in primary infection predict disease progression: the SPARTAC Trial James Williams 1,2,3, Jacob Hurst 1,2,3,
START study: UK-CAB July2015 Community feedback: START study Simon Collins HIV i-Base
Wafaa El-Sadr, MD, MPH ICAP-Columbia University The World Before SMART.
Is monitoring for CD4 counts still needed for the management of patients with long- term HIV RNA suppression? Andrew Hill, Liverpool University, UK.
The Effect of Syphilis Co-infection on Clinical Outcomes in HIV-Infected Persons The Effect of Syphilis Co-infection on Clinical Outcomes in HIV-Infected.
Baseline Antiretroviral Resistance Testing among HIV-Positive Injection Drug Users in a Canadian Setting Nadia Fairbairn 1 M-J Milloy 1 Thomas Kerr 1,
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Impact of HSV-2 suppressive therapy with daily acyclovir on HIV-1 disease progression: a randomized placebo- controlled trial in Rakai, Uganda Steven J.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
HIV and serious non-AIDS conditions Five Years after the SMART Study, a Paradigm Shifting Trial INSIGHT Symposium XIX International AIDS Conference Washington.
Background Acknowledgements: Support was provided by NIAID grants U01 AI042170, U01 AI and U01 AI (CPCRA & INSIGHT) and R44AI (NIAID.
HIV i-Base: SMART Study & CROI Feedback UK-CAB - Feb 2006 UK-CAB 24 February 2006 CROI Feedback: SMART Study Simon Collins.
HIV/renal studies (CHIC) Baseline renal function as predictor of HIV/renal disease progression –Death, opportunistic infection –Severe chronic kidney disease.
Poster # 388 CROI Feb Montreal, Canada Association of HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism with Immunologic and Virologic Parameters in HIV-1 infected,
Twice Weekly Peg-IFN-alpha-2a with Ribavirin Improves Early Viral Kinetics over Standard Therapy Among HIV/HCV Co-Infected African American Patients Alison.
HBV related complications in HIV positive patients during HAART therapy Irina Magdalena Dumitru*, E. Dumitru*, S. Rugina*, Roxana Carmen Cernat**, Simona.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Progressive histological liver improvement after sustained virological response to therapy in HCV / HIV coinfected patients. Jose L. Casado,
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Long-Term Comparison of Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz When Combined with Other Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naïve Persons- The NNRTI.
Figure 2: Trends in currently prescribed antiretroviral therapy % prescribed HAART increased from 74% to 83% Trends in ART use, HIV viral load, and CD4.
A Survival Comparison between HIV+ U.S.-born Latinos and Foreign-born Latinos in Houston, Texas Raouf Arafat, MD, MPH, Adebowale Awosika- Olumo.
Response to Antiretroviral Treatment In an Ethiopian Hospital Samuel Hailemariam, MD, MPH; J Allen McCutchan, MD, MSc Meaza Demissie, MD, PMH, PHD; Alemayehu.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection The INSIGHT START Study Group Ben Andres Oct 15, 2015.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
Slideset on: Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Deferred antiretroviral therapy is associated with lower eGFR in HIV- positive individuals with high CD4 counts A Mocroft 1, AC Achhra 2, M Ross 3, L Ryom.
A randomized study of tenofovir containing HAART compared to lamivudine containing HAART in antiretroviral naïve HIV/HBV coinfected patients in Thailand:
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Alexander Pasternak Laboratory of Experimental Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam Amsterdam,
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Treatment-Naïve Adults
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Seroprevalence, prevalence, type and factors associated with HPV infection at multiple sites in young HIV-positive MSM On behalf of the HPV MAPS Research.
Earlier treatment and lower mortality in infants Initiating ART at
Participants 18year old+
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Factors affecting virological failure in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: a prospective HIV Clinical cohort in rural Uganda. Patrick Kazooba1,
1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
A. Stepanov, A. Kruk, N. Polovinkina, A. Vinogradova
Predictors of antiretroviral treatment associated tuberculosis in Ethiopia: a nested case control study Nebiyu Mesfin, MD.
Utilizing research as an opportunity to strengthen
MHEALTH to Improve Health: Effectiveness of a weekly text messaging intervention to improve ART adherence and HIV Viral Load: WelTel OAKTREE. M.C.M. Murray1,2,3,
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Dorina Onoya1, Tembeka Sineke1, Alana Brennan1,2, Matt Fox1,2
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Impact of Hepatitis C, HIV, or Both on Survival in Veterans in Care Before and After the Introduction of HAART (1996) SL Fultz, MD, MPH CH Chang, PhD AA.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Shawn L Fultz, MD MPH VACS Scientific Meeting, Feb 2004
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
AIDS 2018 | Abstract No. TUPDC0102 | Tuesday July 24, 2018
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Presentation transcript:

Higher rate of antiretroviral therapy reinitiation among HIV-HBV coinfected patients in the episodic arm of the SMART study Dore G.1, Soriano V.2, Neuhaus J.3, Peters L.4, Puoti M.5, Rockstroh J.6, Klein M.7, Tedaldi E.8, Mocroft A.9, Clotet B.10, Lundgren J.4, The SMART study group and INSIGHT 1. National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2. Service of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 3. School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States, 4. Copenhagen HIV Programme, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5. Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Brescia, Italy, 6. Medizinische Universitaetsklinik, Bonn, Germany, 7. Montreal Chest Institute, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada, 8. Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States, 9. Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 10. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Background HBV (5 – 10%) and HCV (10 – 30%) are common coinfections among HIV infected populations HIV associated with higher HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels Increased liver disease mortality in HIV-HCV and HIV-HBV compared to monoinfected populations, even in era of HAART Increasing use of dual HIV/HBV active agents in setting of HIV-HBV coinfection SMART study presents an ideal opportunity to examine HIV-hepatitis immunopathogenesis This international study was designed to address the question of whether HIV management with ART could be done differently to allow sparing use of ART minimising cost and toxicity. Clinical endpoint study which will allow us to say whether these strategies improve quality of life minimising toxicity but maintains HIV control and does not lead to an increase in clinical events

CD4 cell count > 350 cells/mm³ Virologic Suppression SMART study design CD4 cell count > 350 cells/mm³ N=5472 Virologic Suppression (VS) Strategy continuous ART N=2752 Drug Conservation (DC) Strategy defer ART until CD4 <250; then episodic ART until CD4 >350 N= 2720 SMART, which is an acronym for Strategic Management of Antiretroviral Therapy, is a large randomized clinical trial, which studied CD4 cell count guided interruption of antiretroviral therapy. 5472 patients, with a CD4 cell count of more than 350/ml, were included and assigned to either continuous use of antiretroviral therapy (the viral suppression,VS, arm) or the drug conservation (DC) arm where the patients received episodic ART based on the CD4 cell count. In this group ART was deferred until the CD4 cell count decreased below 250 cells/ml and then the patients were on therapy until the CD4 cell count had increased to more than 350/ml The patients were followed for an average of 16 months El-Sadr WM et al, N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2283-2296.

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status SMART study Median follow-up 16 months Primary endpoint: opportunistic disease or death higher in DC (3.3/100 py) than VS (1.3/100 py) group (HR=2.6, 1.9 – 3.7). El-Sadr WM et al, N Engl J Med 2006; 355(22):2283-2296 SMART eligibility allowed HBsAg+ and anti-HCV+, had no ALT-based exclusion, but recommended that subjects requiring continued ART for management of hepatitis should not be enrolled. HBsAg 2.0%; anti-HCV 14.6%; HBV/HCV 0.3% This international study was designed to address the question of whether HIV management with ART could be done differently to allow sparing use of ART minimising cost and toxicity. Clinical endpoint study which will allow us to say whether these strategies improve quality of life minimising toxicity but maintains HIV control and does not lead to an increase in clinical events

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Objective To examine rates of ART reinitiation within the DC (episodic) group of the SMART study according to baseline hepatitis status Sub-groups: 1) HBV; 2) HCV; 3) non-HBV/HCV ART reinitiation examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, gender, prior AIDS, baseline and nadir CD4 count, and HIV viral load This international study was designed to address the question of whether HIV management with ART could be done differently to allow sparing use of ART minimising cost and toxicity. Clinical endpoint study which will allow us to say whether these strategies improve quality of life minimising toxicity but maintains HIV control and does not lead to an increase in clinical events

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Baseline characteristics in DC group HBV (n=65)* HCV (n=402) Non-HBV/HCV (n=2202) Median age (years) 43 41 46 Median baseline CD4 (/mm3) 560 608 595 Baseline HIV-RNA <400 (%) 71 68 72 Median nadir CD4 (/mm3) 207 265 250 Median highest HIV-RNA (log10) 4.7 4.9 Prior AIDS (%) 28 27 24 ART at entry (%) 80 82 85 3TC/FTC, not tenofovir (%) 45 55 57 Tenofovir, not 3TC/FTC (%) 6 5 3TC/FTC and tenofovir (%) 17 12 * Includes 6 subjects with HBV/HCV

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status ART reinitation in DC group HBV (n=65) HCV (n=402) Non-HBV/HCV (n=2202) Reinitiated ART (%) 63.1 45.5 39.2 Median CD4 at reinitiation (/mm3) 233 240 232 <150 (%) 4.9 8.3 10.1 150 – 249 (%) 61.0 47.0 49.8 250 – 349 (%) 26.8 19.9 19.7 350 – 449 (%) 7.3 10.5 8.1 450+ (%) 0.0 14.4 12.3

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Reasons for ART reinitiation in DC group HBV (n=65) HCV (n=402) Non-HBV/HCV (n=2202) CD4 count <250 65.9% 54.6% 59.6% Low CD4% 31.7% 31.1% 27.2% Rapid CD4 decline 24.4% 16.4% 21.6% HIV-related symptoms 7.3% 10.9% 10.6% Progression of HIV disease 0.0% 5.5% 2.8% High HIV-RNA 17.1% 24.0% 20.6% Patient wish 22.0% 28.4% 22.8% Other 19.5% 18.5% 16.0%

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Multivariate model of predictors of ART reinitiation Hazard ratio P value HBV 1.67 (1.22 – 2.29) 0.0014 HCV 1.03 (0.88 – 1.21) 0.70 Prior AIDS 1.41 (1.23 – 1.61) <0.0001 Nadir CD4 count (/100 cells) 0.67 (0.63 – 0.71) Baseline CD4 (/100 cells) 0.87 (0.85 – 0.90) Baseline HIV-RNA <400 c/ml 1.19 (1.04 – 1.37) 0.012 Highest HIV-RNA 1.19 (1.11 – 1.28) Female 0.98 (0.85 – 1.12) 0.75 Age (per 10 years) 1.14 (1.07 – 1.21) 0.0001

SMART: ART reinitiation by hepatitis status Conclusions / discussion HIV-HBV coinfected patients have a higher rate of ART reinitiation (not seen in HIV-HCV coinfected) Higher ART reinitiation due largely to faster decline to CD4 <250 Hepatic flare or reinitiation at higher CD4 counts does not explain higher rate Impact of HBV-DNA rebound on ART reinitiation will be explored Potential insights into HIV-HBV immunopathogenesis This international study was designed to address the question of whether HIV management with ART could be done differently to allow sparing use of ART minimising cost and toxicity. Clinical endpoint study which will allow us to say whether these strategies improve quality of life minimising toxicity but maintains HIV control and does not lead to an increase in clinical events

Acknowledgements INSIGHT HIV/Hepatitis sub-group: Dore G, Soriano V, Neuhaus J, Peters L, Puoti M, Rockstroh J, Klein M, Tedaldi E, Mocroft A, Clotet B, Lundgren J SMART investigators who collected these data, the International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT) Executive Committee for their oversight of the SMART study and valuable editorial assistance. SMART was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); U01AI68641, U01AI042170 and U01AI46362. The NCHECR is funded by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing and is affiliated through the Faculty of Medicine with The University of New South Wales.