Nancy J. Brown-Peterson1, James R

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Lionfish Tutorials Dissection. Lionfish in the Atlantic.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND MINES Reproduction.
Science Behind Sustainable Seafood Age Matters! Alaska Fisheries Science Center.
Sensitivity Analysis of a Spatially Explicit Fish Population Model Applied to Everglades Restoration Ren é A. Salinas and Louis J. Gross The Institute.
Johan Hjort Symposium, Bergen, NO7 Oct Do eggs collected in surveys accurately reflect adult fecundities? Hannes Höffle 1, Frode B. Vikebø 1, Olav.
Intraspecific Variation in Reproductive Behavior and Morphology in the Male Green Anole Lizard (Anolis carolinensis) Joseph R. Vandecar 1, Michele A. Johnson.
12th EMS Annual Meeting & 9th European Conference on Applied Climatology (ECAC), Łódź, September 2012 Rajmund Przybylak, Aleksandra Pospieszyńska.
Analysis of clutch size variation for loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) nesting on Bald Head Island, NC USA Melissa Hedges 1,2 & Jim Berkson 2 1.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
Background  The soft shell clam, Mya arenaria, currently occupies a large geographical range in the northern hemisphere.  Soft shell clams are found.
Oyster Reefs as a Restoration Tool: Do Reef Structure, Physicochemical Conditions, and Wave Energy Environment Affect Reef Sustainability? Sandra M. Casas.
對馬 / 韓國海峽 - 長體蛇鯔的年齡與成長 邱惠君. Introduction Saurida elongata Inhabits sandy-mud bottoms. Depths less than 100m. Japanese trawl fisheries. High meat yield.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
Figure 7: Required number of egg measurements Sexual maturity of females is determined by the presence of eggs ≥ 7 µm according to Littleford (1939). To.
Diel Reproductive Periodicity in Haddock in the Southwestern Gulf of Maine Katie A. Anderson, Francis Juanes and Rodney Rountree University of Massachusetts.
Detection of Karenia brevis in an early bloom stage using the BreveBuster Gary Kirkpatrick 1, David Millie 2, Cindy Heil 3, Mark Moline 4, Steven Lohrenz.
Summary Euphausiids (krill) are important food items of fish, seabirds and whales: consequently, it is important to understand their seasonal cycles. The.
Preliminary Data on Euphausiid Distribution and Growth in the Northern Gulf of Alaska. A.I. Pinchuk, R.R. Hopcroft, K.O. Coyle Institute of Marine Science,
Comparison of Fish Ageing Techniques: Using Scales and Otoliths from Largemouth Bass in Old City Lake. Joey Dyer Undergraduate, Department of Biology Tennessee.
The Reinvestigation of Ovule Development Through Megagametogenesis of the Rapid Cycling Brassica rapa L. and the Quantification of Various Stages William.
John Lake – Marine Biologist RIDFW-Marine Fisheries Section 3 Ft. Wetherill Road Jamestown, RI Young-of-the-Year Survey in RI.
Seasonal variations in mean water column temperatures in the northern GOA (obtained from IMS GLOBEC website ). The temperature.
Keita KODAMA, Takamichi SHIMIZU, Takashi YAMAKAWA and Ichiro AOKI reporter: 黃薇蓉 Reproductive biology of the female Japanese mantis Shrimp Oratosquilla.
Egg production rates of the larger copepods in the Gulf of Alaska: Calanus marshallae, Calanus pacificus, Eucalanus bungii and Neocalanus flemingeri Russell.
Introduction Egg production in copepod species may be the largest component of copepod production and is a parameter routinely monitored in ecosystem studies.
Empirical comparison of historical data and age- structured assessment models for Prince William Sound and Sitka Sound Pacific herring Peter-John F. Hulson,
Bell Work Typically in Arizona When does the Bass spawning season begin?
Acknowledgments Awesome research technicians: Carla Maria Delfino and Kayt Chambers Funding: This research is supported by the U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific.
Egg production rates of Pseudocalanus mimus and Pseudocalanus newmani in the Gulf of Alaska R.R. Hopcroft, C. Clarke, & A.I. Pinchuk Institute of Marine.
Growth Rates of Euphausiids in the Northern Gulf of Alaska in A.I. Pinchuk *, R.R. Hopcroft, K.O. Coyle Institute of Marine Science, University.
DETERMINATION OF GROWTH PARAMETERS. Introduction Growth parameters are used as input data in the estimation of mortality parameters and in yield / recruit.
Presented by: Khiem Phan. OUTLINE I. Introduction II. Materials and Methods III. Results IV. Conclusions
Reproductive adaptations of haarder (Liza haematocheila) to the new environment of the Russian South Seas Svetlana Pianova Federal Research Institute of.
Population Dynamics and Stock Assessment of Red King Crab in Bristol Bay, Alaska Jie Zheng Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska, USA.
Goliath Grouper South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Scientific and Statistical Committee meeting April 6, 2011.
Climate Change Impacts on Estuarine Larval Fish Composition Jamie F. Caridad and Kenneth W. Able Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences. Rutgers University.
Gonado and Hepato Analysis of the Shovelnose Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus) Population in the Wabash River Austin S. Happel1, Reuben Goforth1,
EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly Nice, France, 10th April 2003
Eric M. Gulledge, Luma Akil and H. Anwar Ahmad
related to Careproctus melanurus Gilbert 1892
When is Spawning Biomass a Good Proxy for Stock Reproductive Potential? A Case Study of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the Gulf of Mexico SEFSC.
David A. Dippold1, Robert T. Leaf1, and J. Read Hendon2
Meghan Hartwick, Cheryl Whistler, Erin Urquhart
New Zealand Orange Roughy Fisheries and assessments SPRFMO THIRD WORKSHOP - DEEP WATER WORKING GROUP Alistair Dunn 23 May 2017.
Winter Flounder Spawning Areas in New Haven Harbor
Demographic vital rates and population growth:
Sea Surface Temperature as a Trigger of Butterfish Migration: A Study of Fall Phenology Amelia Snow1, John Manderson2, Josh Kohut1, Laura Palamara1, Oscar.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY IN FISHES Briefly, reproduction is a process or means whereby a fish can maintain its continual existence mainly by sexual method.
P. Sanchez1, M. Baeta2 and R. Allue3
MARAM International Stock Assessment Workshop
Brown Trout Growth: Growing, Growing, or Gone
Life History of the Knobbed Whelk, Busycon carica, in Georgia
Matthew Donaldson , and J. Read Hendon
New insights on Reproductive strategy of swordfish (Xiphias gladius)
Ryuji Yukami‧Seiji Ohshimo‧Mari Yoda‧Yoshiaki Hiyama
Preliminary Assessment of the Age, Growth, & Reproduction of Sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus in the Mississippi Sound and Adjacent Waters J. Read.
THE ATLANTIC STURGEON (ACIPENSER OXYRINCHUS, MITCHILL, 1815) STOCK OF THE SAINT JOHN RIVER, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA Cornel Ceapa1*, Michael Dadswell2,
Morgan M. Corey1, Nancy J. Brown-Peterson2, Robert T. Leaf1, Samuel D
Lecture 12: Population dynamics
Sardine Two-Stock Hypothesis: Results at the Posterior Mode
Russell R. Hopcroft Cheryl Clarke Alexei Pinchuk Amanda Byrd
Dubuque PD Traffic Stop Analysis
Human Responses to the Geophysical Daily, Annual and Lunar Cycles
Mark Fermanich, CU-Denver January 3, 2011
A field energy budget for northern pike, an aquatic piscivore
Age and Growth in Fishes
Maturation and Spawning
Relationship Between NO3 and Salinity:
Striped bass: Predators and Prey
Technical Briefing Northern Shrimp Stock Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Reproduction, Age and Growth of Sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus, in Mississippi Waters Nancy J. Brown-Peterson1, James R. Warren2, William Dempster2, Gary Gray2 and Jason Tilley2 1Department of Coastal Sciences and 2Center for Fisheries Research and Development, The University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, MS Sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus, commonly occur in estuarine and offshore waters of Mississippi and are regularly targeted by fishermen. Sheepshead (N=150) were collected monthly using hook and line from December 2003 – November 2004 in Mississippi waters to assess their reproduction, age and growth. Sheepshead ranged from 234-538 mm TL (230-3,006 g) and 0–6 years, with age 4 fish most common in our samples. There was a highly variable but significantly positive distribution of lengths at age (p=0.01, r2=0.57). Males are longer at a given age than females, and the vonBertalanffy growth equation (based on size and age of fish sampled) predicts a larger maximum size for male sheepshead. All females <294 mm TL were immature, although 33% of age 1 females were sexually mature. The smallest male examined histologically (293 mm TL, age 1) had spermatozoa in the testis. Ovarian maturation began in December, and GSI values of females increased in February, peaked in March and returned to low levels by May. Females are capable of multiple spawns, and most females captured during March and April were undergoing final oocyte maturation. Mean batch fecundity estimates are 219,100 ± 36,700 eggs/female (N=7), and there was no significant relationship between batch fecundity and TL or weight (p>0.05). Our preliminary data suggest the Mississippi sheepshead population appears to be younger, more fecund, and reaches sexual maturity sooner than sheepshead sampled during 1987-1988 in Louisiana. ABSTRACT AGE AND GROWTH REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY SUMMARY Female sheepshead are heavier at a given size than males. Otolith ring deposition occurs annually in late spring. Sheepshead in Mississippi range from 0-6 years; age 4 fish were most common. There is a large variation in size at age for both sexes. Males are longer than females at a given age and reach a larger maximum size. Mississippi sheepshead appear to have a shorter life span than those from South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. All males examined were sexually mature; females reach 100% sexual maturity by age 3. Sheepshead spawn in Mississippi waters during March and April. Females spawn multiple times during the reproductive season; histological evidence suggests some are capable of daily spawning. There is no relationship between batch fecundity and female size; mean batch fecundity is 219,100 eggs/female; mean relative fecundity is 214 eggs/g ovary-free body weight. Mississippi males and females reach sexual maturity at a younger age than Louisiana and Florida sheepshead, and Mississippi females are more fecund than Louisiana females. Additional data are necessary to confirm the above conclusions. Figure 5. Monthly GSI values (mean ± SE) of male and female sheepshead Figure 2. Length-weight relationships of sheepshead W = 2.2x10-5 * TL2.958 r2 = 0.98 N = 80 W = 3.787x10-5 * TL2.865 r2 = 0.97 N = 70 Figure 3. Monthly marginal increments (mean ± SE) of age 4 sheepshead otoliths. N = 52. HO FOM Figure 8. Histological section of a female sheepshead in the FOM maturation class. CA—cortical alveolar oocyte; FOM—oocyte in lipid coalescence stage of FOM; HO—hydrated oocyte; Ygl—yolk globular oocyte; Ygn---yolk granular oocyte. CA Ygn Ygl Sheepshead have a relatively short reproductive period. GSI values of both males and females are elevated from February – April, with a peak in March (Figure 5). This corresponds to previous reports of a February-April spawning season in Louisiana (Render and Wilson 1992) and spawning in March and April in Georgia (Music and Pafford 1984). Female sheepshead ranged from 234 – 548 mm TL (230 – 3,006 g). Male sheepshead were similar in size, ranging from 239 -516 mm TL (235-2,495 g). Both sexes showed a significant, positive relationship between length and weight (Figure 2). Females tend to be heavier at a given size than males. Marginal increment analysis was conducted on otoliths from age 4 sheepshead (N=52) to validate the formation of annular rings. A minimal clear zone, suggesting recent deposition of a ring, was observed in May and August (Figure 3), although these were also months with greatest variability. Marginal increment analysis of age 3 (N=46) also showed a minimum in May. Additional data are necessary to verify annular formation of opaque bands in sheepshead otoliths, but these preliminary data suggest a ring is laid down once a year in May. Thus, we assume that age is equivalent to the number of rings on an otolith. Marginal increment analysis of sheepshead in Louisiana (Beckman et al. 1991) and South Carolina (Wenner 1996) indicated formation of a single annulus in the spring (April-May), similar to our findings. Sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus Sheepshead have asynchronous oocyte development (Figure 8), suggesting females can spawn multiple times during the 2 month spawning season. Some females with hydrated oocytes also had a second batch of oocytes in the lipid coalescence stage of final oocyte maturation (Figure 8), indicating the species is capable of daily spawning. Render and Wilson (1992) reported spawning frequency of sheepshead from Louisiana ranged from every 1 to every 20 days. No evidence of POFs were found in any females in the late maturation (LM) or FOM classes, although only 12 females in these classes were captured during this study. All hydrated females were taken from the offshore barrier islands, supporting previous suggestions that sheepshead primarily spawn offshore (Music and Pafford 1984; Render and Wilson 1992) Figure 6. Percentage of male sheepshead in testicular maturity classes by month Histological evidence of gonadal recrudescence in male sheepshead occurrred as early as October with the presence of fish in the early maturation (EM) class (Figure 6), and males in late maturation (LM) were observed as early as December. Histological evidence of sperm in the ducts was found December – May, although running ripe males were only captured in March, corresponding to the GSI peak (Figure 5). No immature males were observed in the sample; the smallest male examined histologically (293 mm TL, age 1) had spermatozoa in the testis. Nearly all Florida males are also sexually mature by age 1 (Murphy and MacDonald 2000). In contrast, Render and Wilson (1992) found males did not reach 100% maturity until age 4. OBJECTIVES Life history information on sheepshead in the northern Gulf of Mexico is limited to data collected in 1987-1988. The objective of this study is to provide updated information on length-weight relationships, age, growth, reproductive seasonality and fecundity of sheepshead in Mississippi waters. Lmax = 424 K = 0.633 t0 = -0.759 Lmax = 456 K = 0.409 t0 = -1.829 Figure 4. Age-length relationships of sheepshead LITERATURE CITED Beckman, D.W., A.L. Stanley, J.H. Render and C.A. Wilson. 1991. Age and growth-rate estimation of sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus in Louisiana waters using otoliths. Fish. Bull 89:1-8. Murphy, M.D. and T.C. MacDonald. 2000. An assessment of the status of sheepshead in Florida waters through 1999. Florida Marine Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL. 50 p. Music, J.L., Jr. and J.M. Pafford. 1984. Population dynamics and life history aspects of major marine sportfishes in Georgia’s coastal waters. GA Dept. Nat. Res., Coastal Res. Div., Coastal Fish Section, Final Report. Study IV Federal Aid Project F-31. 382 p. Render, J.H. and C.A. Wilson. 1992. Reproductive biology of sheepshead in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121:757-764. Wenner, C.A. 1996. Age and growth of sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus, from Wouth Carolina waters with some preliminary management concepts. SC Dept. Nat. Res. Final Report, job 6 of F-37. 17 p. Sheepshead were collected monthly using hook and line from December 2003 through November 2004 in Mississippi waters, including inshore bays and bayous and near offshore barrier islands. Otoliths were removed, sectioned on an isomet saw and opaque bands were counted under a microscope for age-growth analysis. Gonads were removed, weighed and preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histological analysis. Ovaries of fish undergoing FOM with hydrated oocytes were preserved in Gilson’s fixative and fecundity was determined using the volumetric method. METHODS r2 = 0.37 p = 0.14 Figure 9. Relationship between batch fecundity and TL Figure 7. Percentage of female sheepshead in ovarian maturity classes by month Histological evidence of gonadal recrudescence in female sheepshead was first seen in December, with fish in the early maturation (EM) class (Figure 7). Females in spawning condition (FOM class) were only found in March and April, corresponding to the GSI peak (Figure 5). Regressed females were found during all months except the time of elevated GSI values (February – April). All females <294 mm TL were immature, and all females >353 mm TL were sexually mature. The majority of age 1 (67%) and age 2 (75%) females were immature; all females ages 3-6 were sexually mature. In contrast, female sheepshead in Louisiana and Florida did not reach 100% sexual maturity until age 5 (Render and Wilson 1992; Murphy and MacDonald 2000). There are insufficient data to accurately determine size or age at 50% maturity for females in Mississippi. RESULTS Figure 1. Number of sheepshead captured each month in Mississippi waters. N=80 Females N=70 Males There was no relationship between fish size and batch fecundity (Figure 9). Batch fecundity estimates of 7 fish ranged from 144,010 – 363,321 eggs, with mean batch fecundity of 219,100 ± 36,700 eggs/female. This is greater than batch fecundity reported for 20 Louisiana females, which ranged from 1,100 – 250,000 eggs with a mean of 47,000 (Render and Wilson 1992). Mean relative fecundity of Mississippi fish is 214 ± 42 eggs/g ovary-free body weight. Sheepshead ranged from 0 to 6 years, with age 4 fish most common in our samples. Mississippi sheepshead appear to be much younger than sheepshead from other areas, based on maximum ages of fish collected in South Carolina (26 years; Wenner 1996), Louisiana (20 years; Beckman et al. 1991) and Florida (13-16 years; Murphy and MacDonald 2000). There was a highly variable but significantly positive distribution of lengths at age for both sexes (p = 0.01, r2 = 0.50, males, r2 = 0.38, females; Figure 4). The large variability in size at age is common for sheepshead, and has been reported for South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. Males were longer than females at a given age, and the vonBertalanffy growth equation predicts a larger maximum size for male sheepshead than females (Figure 4). These results are in contrast to findings from Louisiana (Beckman et al. 1991), where females were predicted to be larger than males, although estimated Lmax for males from both areas are the same. However, K values suggest that Mississippi females exhibit more rapid growth to an asymptotic size than males. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sportfish Restoration Program, through the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources.