US CMS HL-LHC HL-LHC Systems Engineering

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals October 21, 2014 Jeremiah Mans On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Requirements Management 6/ Requirements IEEE Standard Glossary A condition or capability needed by a user to solve.
SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification Requirements Management.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Quality Management Dr. Ahmet TÜMAY, PMP.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Engineering Systems of.
2014 Work Planning Local Program Leadership Team.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
US CMS Phase 2 R&D Discussion 30-July-2013 “Phase 2 muon R&D” J. Hauser, UCLA  Add redundancy (power) to trigger where most needed  First and innermost.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
1 Lecture 5.2a: SEF Ch 8 SE Outputs Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Systems Engineering Mike Pryzby Swales Aerospace August 16-17, 2005.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam Preparations for Critical Decision 2/3a Preparations for CD2 Preparations for CD3a DECam MOUs.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Philip Burrows SiD meeting, Chicago 15/11/081 Progress on the LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
FNAL PM kick-off Meeting June 17, 2010 E. do Couto e Silva 1/11 SuperCMDS at SNOLAB Ge Towers System Requirements Eduardo do Couto e Silva
News and Miscellaneous UPO Jan Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding 1 UPO Jan Workshop on Upgrade simulations in 2013 (Jan. 17/18) -ESP in.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
WS1-1 ADM730, Workshop 1, September 2005 Copyright  2005 MSC.Software Corporation WORKSHOP 1 INTRODUCTION Open Retracted - Bad Retracted - Good.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
1 Towards Phase 2 TP releases 2013 Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding Status of current simulations studies and ongoing issues Needs for TP preparation.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Technical Operations 12 th July 2010 Dr Phil Spiby Eurostep Limited Integrating Systems Engineering Information with AP233.
Marco Cattaneo, 3-June Event Reconstruction for LHCb  What is the scope of the project?  What are the goals (short+medium term)?  How do we organise.
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
Session 10 Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
Verification Matrix Process
Final CALICE OsC meeting: Status and summary of project
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Micro-channel Cooling
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Verification Instrument mini-PER (V5)
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
Software Requirements
Francesco Forti University and INFN, Pisa
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Engineering Processes
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
PSS verification and validation
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Project Management Unit #2
Executive Project Kickoff
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

US CMS HL-LHC HL-LHC Systems Engineering Jeff Dolph, Lead Systems Engineer Cornell University 19 May 2017

US CMS HL-LHC HL-LHC Systems Engineering Systems Engineering (SE) in the Project Where are we today? Planning Documents Requirements and Interfaces Define the Technical Configuration Manage the Technical Configuration US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Systems Engineering Functions CHRIS & JEFF in work DONE L2 Sys engineering requirements now - June Progress design to validate requirements No requirements level below engineering just work to do! US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Systems Engineering Team Lead Systems Engineer Facilitate Systems Engineering across L2 areas Ensure Configuration Management followed Ensure Quality Management Plan followed Systems Engineers have started with first pass of engineering requirements, no contact from * -need to consider names for DOE scope TFPX – Diona O’Daniel, Yadira Fuentes Forward Muons – Mikhail Matveev, Tom Gorski* ECAL – Tom Gorski* Trigger – Richard Cavanaugh* *need build of engineering requirements in doc 13317 & 13318 respectively US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Timeline Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) Now – June workshop REQUIREMENTS – plan the design development work June workshop – end of July INTERFACES – ICD listing, very preliminary support documentation/data Now – June workshop TECHNICAL RISKS – register new ones and do first and re-evaluations (largely addition of risks related to not meeting requirements) Configuration Management Plan (CMP) July – August CONFIGURATION DATA LIST – Technical Requirements, ICDs plus their supporting documents/data August – September TECHNICAL CONFIGURATION – practice Change Control when verifying RLS to the L2 System configurations US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Requirements Flow-down/Trace-back US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Example “engr” Requirement Object Heading ID Type Object Text Rationale Notes Parents 1st Verification Method (VM) 1st VM Work Assignment 1st VM References TFPX Engineering Requirements   Heading The following requirements are first listed for the complete TFPX system; and, thereafter requirements are listed for individual Level 3 subsystems and their components. Survive Radiation TFPX-engr-001 requirement TFPX shall operate efficiently [define] up to radiation dose of 3000 fb^-1. What is the highest level system that needs tested? Need to define "operate efficiently" for development test. TFPX-sci-engr-005 development test TFPX-engr-002 TFPX shall withstand [define] radiation dose up to (~) [determine instead of ~, maybe it is just the values here] 1x10^16 eta_eq cm^-2, 500 Mrad. What is the highest level system? Need to define "withstand" for development test. It seems to be something less than operate efficiently. engineering analysis Fine Granularity TFPX-engr-003 An array of standardized rectangular-size ROC/Sensor/HDI Modules shall be mounted to the TFPX D-sections in a coverage optimized pattern. TFPX shall distinguish tracks that are close to one another. The inactive pixel threshold acceptance criteria is documented in the respective QC test plan. At 3Ghz/cm^2 the channel occupancy = 0.2%. TFPX-sci-engr-001 design drawing or spec. An array of standardized rectangular-size ROC/Sensor/HDI Modules shall be mounted to the TFPX D-sections in a coverage optimized pattern. TFPX shall distinguish tracks that are close to one another. The inactive pixel threshold acceptance criteria is documented in the respective QC test plan. US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Requirements Template 1st Verification Method (VM) use drop-down menu, values are in column O design drawing or spec. engineering analysis scientific simulation development test systems engineering analysis specification selection specification development QC test QC inspection ES&H Review engineering demo add 1 Title Requirement Text Rationale 1st Verification Method (VM) 1st VM Owner 1st VM docdb# 2nd Verification Method (VM) 2nd VM Owner 2nd VM docdb# L2SYS Engineering Requirements succinct requirement statement with values, either range, min or max The following requirements are first listed for the complete L2SYS system; and, thereafter requirements are listed for individual L3 subsystems and their components. use drop-down menu, values are in column O physicist or engineer preparing VM reference material best to use a single controlled docdb# for all associated with a requirement [helpful to list title of all requirements first] [xxx shall…] [xxx is… because…] design drawing or spec.   add 1 engineering analysis engineering demo scientific simulation ES&H Review development test QC inspection systems engineering analysis QC test specification selection specification development ES&H CERN Logistics L3Sub & Components Engineering Requirements Requirement Text succinct requirement statement with values, either range, min or max [xxx shall…] US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Summary Systems Engineers develop L2 engineering requirements and interface control documentation Preliminary baseline the technical configuration Manage the configuration Control technical configuration by establishing requirements Change Control - evaluate changes systematically Interface changes are controlled If there is a necessary (or surprise) interface change it’s impact can be evaluated Work to one configuration simulation models, FE models, CAD models, drawings, spec selection… If there is need to change a requirement significantly then the rework and/or additional work can be assessed in a managed configuration. US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Example “sys-engr” (traces up from “engr”) Object Heading ID Type Object Text Rationale Notes Parents 1st Verification Method (VM) 1st VM Work Assignment 1st VM References TFPX Science and Engineering Requirements   Heading The following requirements are listed for the complete TFPX system which flow down to multiple TFPX system and TFPX subsystems requirements on the TFPX Engr Requirements sheet. Fine Granularity TFPX-sci-engr-001 requirement TFPX shall have 25x100 and 50x50 micrometer pixel sizes. TFPX shall distinguish tracks that are close to one another. The granularity defined in this requirement is within current sensor and asic technology. At 3Ghz/cm^2 the channel occupancy = 0.2%. TFPX-sci- scientific simulation see notes Add Tracker Coverage TFPX-sci-engr-002 TFPX shall increase the Tracker coverage to |eta|=4.0 This increase in Tracker coverage will provide enough hits to perform more efficient and accurate reconstruction independent of other CMS detectors. Material Minimization TFPX-sci-engr-003 TFPX design shall minimize material mass and density. Material causes scattering and secondaries that can confuse particle pattern recognition. engineering analysis Size Constraints TFPX-sci-engr-004 TFPX shall fit within the dimensional envelope defined by the evolving CMS HL-LHC Upgrade requirements of interfacing systems. Continuous flow of information is necessary for the TFPX Final Design to fit within and be optimized for the available space. systems engineering analysis Reliability TFPX-sci-engr-005 TFPX shall operate within the CMS detector in the HL-LHC environment for a minimum of 10 years. Full NASA, FAA or DOD type of reliabllity analysis is not required for the CMS HL-LHC project and experiment. The sum of all VM's must satisfy the collaboration that this requirement will be verifiable. Software and Firmware TFPX-sci-engr-006 per SQA QC test link to SQA TFPX shall have 25x100 and 50x50 micrometer pixel sizes. TFPX shall distinguish tracks that are close to one another. The granularity defined in this requirement is within current sensor and asic technology. US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017

Systems Engineering & Project Management The Project plans to the Technical Configuration. US CMS HL-LHC Systems Engineering 19 May 2017