Figure 1. (a) Trends in human population (USCB 1993, 2001) with projections to 2025 (Campbell 1996). (b) Trends in land cover, including forest (Smith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer
Advertisements

TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 18 Trophic State and Eutrophication Dodds & Whiles.
Nutrient Input and Eutrophication 1 Agricultural activities and sewage add nutrients, as well as disease organisms, to marine environments.
Ecological Perspectives on Critical Loads - Linkages between Biogeochemical Cycles and Ecosystem Change Differences and Similarities in N and S Cycling.
Chapter 12 Chapter 12 The Global Cycles of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
SOURCES AND FLUX OF NUTRIENTS IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN: MONITORING, MODELING, & RESEARCH NEEDS Donald A. Goolsby, U.S. Geological Survey.
Nutrient Fluxes in the Neponset River Watershed sccwrp.org.
NATURAL pH OF RAIN Equilibrium with natural CO 2 (280 ppmv) results in a rain pH of 5.7: This pH can be modified by natural acids (H 2 SO 4, HNO 3, RCOOH…)
Figure 54.0 A terrarium, an example of an ecosystem.
NH Estuaries Project Environmental Indicators Phil Trowbridge, P.E. NHEP/DES Coastal Scientist June 15, 2006.
Long-term Changes in Lamprey River Chemistry William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Integrating Cropland Management into.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Contents I.History of Hubbard Brook II.Watershed Concept III.Discovery of Acid Rain IV.Long-term Monitoring V.Ecosystem Recovery.
When identified? 19 th century – 1800’s Where? England Who? pharmacist Robert Angus Smith How? What is it?
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
QUESTIONS 1.Is the rate of reaction of S(IV) more likely to be slower than calculated for a cloud droplet or a rain droplet? Why? 2.If you wanted to determine.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
F I A Forest Inventory and Analysis Program The Nation’s Forest Census 2010 FIA Biomass Update W. Brad Smith.
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Nitrogen cycle Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria Moskalenko, Gretchen Miles, Emily Paduano, Jaconette Mirck Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria.
Hamilton, S. K Water quality and movement in agricultural landscapes. Pages in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll, and G. P. Robertson, editors.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Session 853 Extending Organizational Capacity & Capability to Evaluate Federal Environmental Research Programs Research Contributions to Outcomes & Accountability.
Focus on the Headwaters The Shenandoah Watershed Study / The Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study Rick Webb Department of Environmental Sciences University.
Why do we Measure Precipitation Chemistry? Christopher Lehmann CAL Director 2007 Field Operations Training Course.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Contents Ecosystem Changes Chemical Recovery Biological Recovery Future Changes.
Slide 1 Galveston Bay Atmospheric Deposition Study Anil K. Katamreddy CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Fall 2003 University of Texas at Austin.
Geologic controls on the chemical stream water response to atmospheric pollution (acid and Hg deposition) in Shenandoah National Park Ami Riscassi Drew.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Chapter 1 Introduction to Ecosystem Science © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, Weathers, Strayer, and Likens.
Chapter 7 The Nitrogen Cycle © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, Weathers, Strayer, and Likens (eds).
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
– NUTRIENTS 2 Chapter 3.4 in Chapman et al. Gretchen Gettel/Peter Kelderman UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education Online Module Water Quality.
The Delaware River Watershed & Airshed A Power Plant in Ohio A Car in Washington, D.C. A Dairy Farm in Pennsylvania.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Monitoring and Modeling the Acidification and Recovery of Catskills Waters and Soils Chris E. Johnson & Charles T. Driscoll Dept. of Civil & Environmental.
Figure 10. Improvement in landscape resolution that the new 250-meter MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) measurement of gross primary.
Water-Quality Monitoring in an Urban Watershed:
Figure 1. (a) Distribution of biotic mercury (Hg) observations across the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada, and specific distribution.
Establishing a Soil Chemical Baseline for the Catskills
Acid Rain Monitoring Update: NY’s Monitoring Program Federal Legislation EPA “Pilot” Monitoring Program DAR Management Meeting Albany, NY September 11-13,
Great Smoky Mountains national Park
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Table 1. Linkages between emissions of SO2 and NOx and important environmental issues From: Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern.
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
Long-term trends in uncertainty of element fluxes at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest Mark Green, Donald Buso, John Campbell, Carrie Rose Levine,
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Noah El-Naboulsi & Shannon Rogers
From: Can We Afford to Conserve Biodiversity?
ReNuMa: Nitrogen Dynamics
Examples of significant, long-term increases in baseline concentration of chloride for streams and rivers of the northeastern United States. Examples.
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Chapter 13 The Global Cycles of Sulfur and Mercury
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
Chapter 9 Revisiting the Ecosystem Concept: Important Features That Promote Generality and Understanding © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. (a) Trends in human population (USCB 1993, 2001) with projections to 2025 (Campbell 1996). (b) Trends in land cover, including forest (Smith et al. 2001), farmland (USCB 1977, USDA 1999), and other lands. Dashed lines indicate estimates. The sum of land area slightly exceeds 100% because data were from different sources and because farmland area often included areas in farm woodlots. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 2. Land cover in 1990 and coastal watershed boundaries Figure 2. Land cover in 1990 and coastal watershed boundaries. Data from the National Land Cover Database (USGS 1999). From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 3. (a) Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) emissions, in thousands of kilotons per year, and (b) wet dissolved inorganic N (DIN) deposition, in kilograms per hectare, for the eastern United States. Nitrogen oxide (NO<sub>x</sub>) emissions were obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency for 1996 (EPA 1998); ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emissions were obtained from Carnegie Mellon University’s Ammonia Emission Inventory for the Continental United States (Strader et al. 2001). The primary airshed is based on regional acid deposition model calculations and shows the area from which the emissions originate that contribute 65% of the deposition to Long Island Sound (LIS; Paerl et al. 2002). Map: National Atmospheric Deposition Program, National Trends Network (NADP 2000). From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 4. (a) Time series of atmospheric emissions, in megatons (Mt), of sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) for the United States; (b) annual volume-weighted bulk deposition, in microequivalents per liter (µeq per L), of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>); and (c) the equivalent percentage of anions (sulfate ]SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2–</sup>], nitrate [NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>], and chloride [Cl<sup>–</sup>]) in bulk deposition at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Modified from Likens and Lambert 1998. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 5. Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) inputs to the watersheds of the northeastern United States, in kilograms per hectare per year. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 6. Anthropogenic N inputs to the estuaries of the northeastern United States, in kilograms per hectare per year. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 7. Total dissolved nitrogen (N; the sum of ammonium, nitrate, and organic nitrogen) concentrations, in micromoles per liter, in streams draining watersheds with a predominant land use. (a) Canajoharie Creek, Canajoharie, New York (intensive row crop production); (b) Fall Kill River, Poughkeepsie, New York (urban, sewered); and (c) Lisha Kill Creek, Niskayuna, New York (suburban, residential) are in the Hudson River drainage. (d) Winnisook Creek, near Frost Valley, New York (undisturbed forest), is in the Delaware River drainage, although the sampling site was within 1 kilometer of the Hudson–Delaware divide. All data points represent individual samples except the data from Winnisook Creek, which represent monthly means of approximately weekly sampling. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 8. Time course of nitrogen (N) loading and eelgrass coverage in Waquoit Bay between 1938 and 1992 (data from Valiela et al. 2000 and Bowen and Valiela 2001). (a) Modeled historical N loads (in thousands of kilograms per year) to the Waquoit Bay estuary from atmospheric deposition, human wastewater, and fertilizer application. (b) The relationship between N loading (in kilograms per hectare per year) and eelgrass loss (in hectares) as determined from sampling subestuaries within the Waquoit system. (c) Areal extent of eelgrass beds in Waquoit Bay from 1951 to 1992. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Figure 9. Predicted annual nitrogen (N) flux to Long Island Sound and Casco Bay under various management scenarios using the Watershed Assessment Tool for Evaluating Reduction Scenarios for Nitrogen. BNR is biotic nitrogen removal. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Table 1. Nitrogen reduction scenarios and their policy basis. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences

Table 2. Model calculations using PnET-BGC to compare changes in annual volume-weighted concentrations of nitrate (▵NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>), in micromoles per liter (µmol/L), and acid neutralizing capacity (▵ANC), in microequivalents per liter (µeq/L), for various scenarios to control atmospheric emissions of nitrogen for watershed 6 at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) in New Hampshire and Biscuit Brook in the Catskill region of New York. Model calculations are shown for two years, 2030 and 2050. From: Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options BioScience. 2003;53(4):357-374. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0357:NPITNU]2.0.CO;2 BioScience | © 2003 American Institute of Biological Sciences