July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0840r0 Comparison between Simulated and Measured Results for a Residential Setting Date: 2017-01 Authors: Name Affiliations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE / 0431 r0 March 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Shared MIMO Architecture for ay. Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0323r1 Submission March 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 TGad Channel Model Requirements Date: Authors:
2008/5/81 Fixed WiMAX Field Trial Measurements and Analyses Ole Gr0ndalen, Pal Gr0nsund, Tor Breivik, Paal Engelstad Mobile and Wireless Communications.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
My Home By Matt Babiak.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission Sept 2006 Su-Khiong Yong, Samsung-SAITSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
May 2006 Zhiguo Lai, University of Massachusetts - Amherst Slide 1 doc.: IEEE c Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Analysis on IEEE c coexistence scheme Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission September 2006 Slide 1 Hirokazu Sawada, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Technische Universität Ilmenau
Hala Esawi Hana Masri Shorouq Abu Assab Supervised by: Dr.Yousef Dama
Wi-Fi Network Signal Strength Field Data
Snapshot of Residential Wi-Fi Activity
Outdoor AP measurement in Tokyo
TGad Architecture Discussion Topics
TGad Channel Model Requirements
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
Various Symbol Types for WUR
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Comparison between Simulated and Measured Results for a Residential Setting Date: Authors: Name Affiliations.
Network Based Use Case Date: Authors: February 2016
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
Architectural Design Styles of Houses.
Report on WFA LTE-U Workshop
Indoor Propagation Modeling
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Planning and Sketching a Floor Plan
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Summery of Channel Measurement for the ay Channel Model Document
In-band interference effects on UWB
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> March 2004
Coherence Time Measurement in NTT Lab.
Planning and Sketching a Floor Plan
Evaluation of WUR sync sequence
November, 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Smart Antenna Opportunities for Spectrum.
Evaluation of WUR sync sequence
WUR Discovery Frame Content
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
WUR Discovery Frame Content
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
ARC SC Closing Report – July 2013
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2006
20/40MHz Channel Selection
ISD SG Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2012 May 2012
ARC Standing Committee
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Sept 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Sept 2006
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Link Budget Analysis Date: Authors: November 2015
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Discussion of WG self-imposed policy to limit simultaneous letter ballots Date: Authors: David Bagby,
Arc SC Chairs’ Report Jacksonville, FL, US May ‘08
Interference Analysis for Residential Environments
Simulation Scenario Floor Plans
TGad Task Group Document Open Items
Arc SC Chairs’ Report Denver, CO, US July ‘08
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Network Based Use Case Date: Authors: February 2016
TGak January Closing Report
Planning and Sketching a Floor Plan
Presentation transcript:

July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0840r0 Comparison between Simulated and Measured Results for a Residential Setting Date: 2017-01 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Zabed Iqbal Georgia Southern University 1100 I.T. Drive, BLDG 255, Room 1313 Statesboro, GA 30458 701-404-3818 zi00060@georgiasouthern.edu James Moseley 478-455-2786 jm12068@georgiasouthern.edu Sungkyun Lim 912-478-2266 sklim@georgiasouthern.edu Carol Ansley ARRIS Enterprises LLC 3871 Lakefield Dr. Suwanee GA USA 678-473-8630 carol.ansley@arris.com David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

Jan 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1455r0 Abstract This document presents the results of a comparison of simulated and measured RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) tests in a residential setting. Simulation based on ray tracing method has been carried out and compared with measurement data. Both the simulated and measured results show good agreement over different transmitter positions. David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

Outline Motivation & Objectives Approach Initial Setup Jan 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1455r0 Outline Motivation & Objectives Approach Initial Setup Comparison of Measurement and Simulation for Position 1 Comparison of Measurement and Simulation for Position 2 Comparison of Measurement and Simulation for Position 3 Comparison of Measurement and Simulation for Position 4 Summary David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

1. Motivation & Objectives Characterize propagation channel for 60 GHz correctly in Wi-Fi test house Avoid multiple time-consuming measurements. Objectives Measure the RSSI data in Wi-Fi test house. Create the Wi-Fi test house for simulation and numerically calculate RSSI. Verify simulation results by comparing with the measured data. Wi-Fi test house

2. Approach Take RSSI measurement using 60GHz Access Point in residential Wi-Fi test house. Create residential Wi-Fi test house in simulation software based on the floor plan to simulate 60 GHz wireless propagation. Compare the simulation results with measured data. Determine accuracy of simulation software. Try different transmitter positions to validate simulated results.

3. Initial Setup 1st Floor 2nd Floor Combined Floor

RSSI (dBm) Mapping Matlab- Color Map Floor Layout RSSI (dBm) Mapping Matlab- Color Map Customized floor layout and color map Shows all the position/rooms to color map in contrast to the floor layout “O” indicates the position of metal

*Ray propagation of both floor is shown. Ray Tracing *2nd floor has been kept invisible to observed the ray propagation in the 1st floor. *Ray propagation of both floor is shown.

* Antenna position with radiation pattern shown in the simulation. 4. Comparison of Measurement and Simulation (with refrigerator and TV) for Position 1 Linux Machine Access Point * Antenna position with radiation pattern shown in the simulation.

3D Layout Floor Layout *3D model has been created exactly same as the Arris Test House floor plan. *Roof (both top floor and 1st floor) has been made invisible to show the 3D layout clearly.

3D Layout with simulation results TV Metal Appliances *Position 1: Half Sphere is the radiation pattern of the 60 GHz transmitter

3D Layout with Simulation Results Simulation Results(Color-Map) *To show the Simulation Color-map More clearly, 2nd floor has been made invisible.

RSSI(dBm) Measurement Direct Comparison Between RSSI of Measurement and Simulation Results Using Matlab Colormap RSSI(dBm) Measurement RSSI(dBm) Simulation *Measurement and Simulation results are almost similar. In the master bedroom and garden room there is almost no signal both in measurement and simulation. For kitchen, there is a metal refrigerator (marked ‘O’) and other metal kitchen appliances (marked ‘O’), for which there is week signal in measurement as well as in the simulation.

5. Comparison of Measurement and Simulation (with Fridge and TV) for Position 2 *Setup Position- Living room Corner with Chair in front of the transmitter

3D Layout Floor Layout *Position 2: Transmitter is in the corner of living room with a wooden chair in front of it.

3D Layout with Simulation Results Simulation Results Color- Map *To show the Simulation Color-map More clearly, 2nd floor has been made invisible.

RSSI(dBm) Measurement Direct Comparison Between RSSI of Measurement and Simulation Results Using Matlab Color-Map RSSI(dBm) Measurement RSSI(dBm) Simulation *In the master bedroom and garden room there is almost similar signal both in measurement and simulation. For kitchen, there is a metal refrigerator (marked ‘O’) and other metal kitchen appliances (marked ‘O’), for which there is no signal in measurement and as well as in the simulation.

6. Comparison of Measurement and Simulation (with Fridge and TV) for Position 3 *Setup position- Living room Corner without Chair in front of transmitter

3D Layout Floor Layout *Position 3: Transmitter is in the corner of living room removing the wooden chair in front of it.

3D Layout with Simulation Results Simulation Results Color- Map *To show the simulation color-map more clearly, 2nd floor has been made invisible.

RSSI(dBm) Measurement Direct Comparison Between RSSI of Measurement and Simulation Results using Matlab Color-Map RSSI(dBm) Measurement RSSI(dBm) Simulation * Measurement and Simulation results are almost similar. For kitchen, there is a metal refrigerator (marked ‘O’) and other metal kitchen appliances (marked ‘O’), for which there is no signal in measurement as well as in the simulation in the bottom circle, and week signal in the upper circle.

7. Comparison of Measurement and Simulation (with fridge and TV) for Position 4 Setup position: beside the walkway directive to living room

3D Layout Floor Layout *Position 4: Transmitter is besides the walkway directive to living room.

3D Layout with Simulation Results Simulation Results Color- Map *To show the simulation color-map more clearly, 2nd floor has been made invisible

Direct Comparison Between RSSI of Measurement and Simulation Results using Matlab Color-Map RSSI(dBM) Mesurement RSSI(dBm) Simulation * In the master bedroom and garden room there is almost similar signal both in measurement and simulation. For kitchen, there is a metal refrigerator (marked ‘O’) and other metal kitchen appliances (marked ‘O’), for which there is no signal in measurement, as well as in the simulation.

Comments: No Furniture except one wooden chair for measurement 2 has been used in the simulation. Two metal objects (one refrigerator and kitchen appliance and other for TV) has been used in the simulation. The transmitter was placed in the exact same position in simulation and measurement.

8. Summery/Observations: Metal object has very degrading effects on signal strength. Wooden and other furniture does not hamper the signal strength much unless they are located very close to the transmitter. The simulation results agree well with measured ones. The simulation result will be improved if the dimensions and material properties of metal objects and other variables are identified.