Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
Advertisements

S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
The Results of Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS01) Experiment in Space Behcet Alpat I.N.F.N. Perugia TAUP 2001 Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi ,
ROBERTA SPARVOLI UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA & INFN (ITALIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS) Results from the PAMELA space experiment.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Performance of AMS-02 on the International Space Station DESY Theory Workshop, Hamburg Melanie Heil Supported by the Carl-Zeiss Foundation.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Gravitational waves LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory ) in Louisiana. A laser beam is.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
Aspen 4/28/05Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic Ray Spectrum - “Below the Knee” Working Group “Below the Knee” Working Group Report - Day 3 Binns,
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
Detection of cosmic rays in the SKALTA experiment Marek Bombara (P. J. Šafárik University Košice), Kysak, August 2011.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Geomagnetic Spectroscopy: An Estimation of Primary Mass of Cosmic Rays Rajat K Dey 1,2 Arunava Bhadra 2 Jean-No ë l Capdevielle 3 1 Department of Physics.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
An assessment of the NRLMSISE-00 density thermosphere description in presence of space weather events C. Lathuillère and M. Menvielle The data and the.
The Millisecond Pulsar Contribution to the Rising Positron Fraction Christo Venter 34 th ICRC, The Hague, The Netherlands, 30 July – 6 August 2015 Collaborators:
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,
The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station (ISS) Maria Ionica I.N.F.N. Perugia International School.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
High-energy Electron Spectrum From PPB-BETS Experiment In Antarctica Kenji Yoshida 1, Shoji Torii 2 on behalf of the PPB-BETS collaboration 1 Shibaura.
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
Direct measurements of cosmic rays in space ROBERTA SPARVOLI ROME “TOR VERGATA” UNIVERSITY AND INFN, ITALY Vulcano Workshop 2014 Vulcano Island (Italy),
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
2011, 10th AprilIII Fermi symposium , 10th AprilIII Fermi symposium2.
32 nd ICRC –Beijing – August 11-18, 2011 Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Observation of MGRO J with.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
HIGH ENERGY POSITRON DETECTION VIA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION IN MAGENTOSPHERE “SONYA” project А.М. Гальпер 1, О.Ф. Прилуцкий 2, С.В. Колдашов 1, В.В. Михайлов.
Topicality of this work is caused by the fact that modern detectors aren't effective in searching electrons and positrons with energies higher than 1 TeV.
1 A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments.
AGILE as particle monitor: an update
Update on the analysis of muon angular distributions in equatorial coordinates F.Riggi Dept. of Physics and INFN, Catania.
Cosmogenic Muon Background
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Impulsive Increase of Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Observed by IceTop
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Harm Schoorlemmer, for the Pierre Auger Collaboration H. Schoorlemmer
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Theoretical status of high energy cosmic rays and neutrinos
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
Cosmic-Rays Astrophysics with AMS-02
Secondary positrons and electrons measured by PAMELA experiment
Vladimir Mikhailov (MEPhI) on behalf PAMELA collaboration
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Anisotropy of Primary Cosmic Rays
Nicolo’ Masi, Andrea Tiseni TOF Group Bologna
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Forbush and GCRDs First rigorous experimental observation of Cosmic Ray Flux Decrease was obtained by S. E. Forbush in , after deep statisitcal.
Alexander Mishev & Ilya Usoskin
Application of neutron monitor data for space weather
ICRC2003 OG Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Proton and Anti-proton Spatial Distribution in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki, Ayako Kuwahara, Nozomi, Sawada Faculty.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
DARK PHOTONS FROM THE SUN
INFN Sez. Milano-Bicocca
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Study on Large-Scale CR Anisotropy with ARGO-YBJ experiment
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
Presentation transcript:

Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca INFN Milano-Bicocca on behalf of the AMS-02 collaboration 5-Sep-2016

Motivation for CR anisotropy search with AMS Sez. Milano-Bicocca Motivation for CR anisotropy search with AMS AMS-02 observes structures in the spectra of e+, e-, p, He that cannot be fully explained within the current physical knowledge. These features may be connected to new phenomena which could induce some degree of anisotropy in their fluxes: Local environment (galactic magnetic field, effects due to the solar activity at low rigidity) Local sources (pulsars for e+ and e-, local SNRs or Wolf-Rayet stars for p and He) AMS02 Proton Flux PRL 114, 171103 (2014) http://phys.org/news/2015-11-cosmic-rays-two-million-year-old-supernova.html AMS02 Positron Fraction PRL 113, 121101 (2014)

Sez. Milano-Bicocca AMS-02: the detector AMS: A TeV precision, multipurpose particle physics spectrometer in space. TRD: to identify e+ and e- TOF: measure Z, E Tracker: measure Z, P, incoming direction ECAL: measure lepton energy Proton background is reduced to the per mil level with a cut based selection on the TRD and ECAL estimators Selected particles for this analisys in [16:350]GeV, from 05/2011 to 11/2015: 70.000 positrons 920.000 electrons 60.000.000 protons

Sez. Milano-Bicocca AMS-02: operation Since May 2011, AMS-02 is operating 24/7 on board of ISS: 400Km altitude orbit inclination 51.6° relative to the Earth Equator South Geographic Pole AMS-02 exposure in Galactic cordinates BEING IN SPACE: A long term, (nearly) full-sky observation and a three-dimensional measurement of the tiny CR anisotropy signals; Primary CR detected before interacting with the atmosphere; In Low Earth Orbits, the presence of the magnetosphere: CR directions after trajectory reconstruction in magnetosphere, rigidity cut-off; Not uniform exposure.

Methodology for anisotropy search Sez. Milano-Bicocca Methodology for anisotropy search RELATIVE ANISOTROPIES: other CR species as reference for detector exposure: other cosmic ray species (e.g. p used for leptons, also at magnetosphere border) same cosmic ray species (at different energy) A likelihood fit procedure has been set up to compare the species under study to the reference sky map. It takes into account the differences in the exposure for different rigidities. A spherical harmonics expansion of the relative anisotropy is obtained: φ 𝑏,ℓ = 𝑙=0 ∞ 𝑚=−𝑙 +𝑙 𝑎 𝑙𝑚 𝑌 𝑙𝑚 (𝑏,ℓ) For the three dipole components (𝑙=1): North-South Forward-Backward East-West 𝜌 𝑁𝑆 = 3 4𝜋 𝑎 10 𝜌 𝐹𝐵 = 3 4𝜋 𝑎 11 𝜌 𝐸𝑊 = 3 4𝜋 𝑎 1−1 𝛿= 𝜌 𝑁𝑆 2 + 𝜌 𝐹𝐵 2 + 𝜌 𝐸𝑊 2 Dipole amplitude:

Positrons vs. electrons Sez. Milano-Bicocca Positrons vs. electrons Dipole components in galactic coordinates No significant deviation from isotropy is found

Positrons vs. electrons Sez. Milano-Bicocca Positrons vs. electrons Dipole upper limit in galactic coordinates Upper limit ẟ scaled to the statistics No significant deviation from isotropy is found 𝛿 𝑒 + 𝑒 − (>16GeV) < 2% at 95% C.L. Significance map

Back-tracing in magnetosphere Sez. Milano-Bicocca Back-tracing in magnetosphere The back-tracing allows to reconstruct the trajectories of the cosmic rays detected by AMS02 at ISS altitude in a deterministic way up to the border of the magnetosphere.

Back-tracing in magnetosphere Sez. Milano-Bicocca Back-tracing in magnetosphere Model description Internal Field: IGRF-12 model is a standard mathematic description of the Earth main magnetic field and its annual rate of change (secular variation) External Field: Tsyganenko 2005 model: includes all external currents contributions to external magnetic field. It describes the Earth magnetosphere during both quiet and active solar periods. Magnetosphere border in the day-side, variable from 15 to 10 Earth Radii, according to the solar wind pressure in the night-side, fixed to 25 Earth Radii Back-tracing Protons in [16:350]GV Focusing towards the equator At ISS altitude At magnetosphere border

Back-tracing in magnetosphere Sez. Milano-Bicocca Back-tracing in magnetosphere The reference sky map The magnetosphere introduces a displacement with respect the asymptotic direction. This displacement decreases with rigidity. M. Ackermann et al. 2012 The sky observed outside the magnetosphere depends on the considered rigidity and on the particle charge. Sky maps from opposite charge particles cannot be compared at magnetosphere border: e+ vs. p and e- vs. p* (*negative charge BT p)

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Positrons vs. protons Dipole components in galactic coordinates No significant deviation from isotropy is found

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Positrons vs. protons Dipole upper limit in galactic coordinates Upper limit ẟ scaled to the statistics No significant deviation from isotropy is found 𝛿 𝑒 + 𝑝 (>16GeV) < 2% at 95% C.L. Significance map

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Electrons vs. protons* Dipole components in galactic coordinates No significant deviation from isotropy is found *Protons back-traced with negative charge

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Electrons vs. protons* Dipole upper limit in galactic coordinates Upper limit ẟ scaled to the statistics No significant deviation from isotropy is found 𝛿 𝑒 − 𝑝 (>16GeV) < 0.6% at 95% C.L. Significance map *Protons back-traced with negative charge

Protons vs. protons Original idea: look for directional Sez. Milano-Bicocca Protons vs. protons Original idea: look for directional dependence of energetic protons. Use low energy protons as reference map, well above geomagnetic cut-off, low solar modulation effects. Reference sample High energy proton map Proton sample above 80GV

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Protons vs. protons Dipole components in galactic coordinates No significant deviation from isotropy is found

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Protons vs. protons Dipole upper limit in galactic coordinates Upper limit ẟ scaled to the statistics No significant deviation from isotropy is found 𝛿 𝑝 𝐻 𝑝 𝐿 (>80GV) < 0.3% at 95% C.L. Significance map

GSE – Geocentric Solar Ecliptic coordinate system Sez. Milano-Bicocca Seasonal variation Seasonal variation of the relative anisotropies is studied by dividing the period of analysis (May 2011 – Nov 2015) in seasons (4 seasons per year) Check for possible time dependence of the signal; Detect possible signal dependence as function of position in the heliosphere or correlation with solar activity and solar events. GSE – Geocentric Solar Ecliptic coordinate system

No significant deviation from isotropy is found Sez. Milano-Bicocca Seasonal variation No significant deviation from isotropy is found Results for electrons and protons Electrons vs. protons [16:350]GV Upper limit ẟ scaled to the statistics Nov-11 May-12 Feb-13 Aug-13 May-14 Feb-15 Aug-15 Protons vs. protons >80GV Nov-11 May-12 Feb-13 Aug-13 May-14 Feb-15 Aug-15

Sez. Milano-Bicocca Conclusions Positron and electron angular distributions are compatible with isotropy, at all energies and both at ISS location and at magnetosphere border. Upper limits are set on the dipole anisotropy strenght: 𝛿 𝑒 + 𝑒 − >16GV <2% at 95% C.L. 𝛿 𝑒 + 𝑝 >16GV <2% at 95% C.L. 𝛿 𝑒 − 𝑝 >16GV <0.6% at 95% C.L. Proton sky at high rigidity is compatible with the proton distribution at low rigidity. The upper limit on dipole anisotropy is 𝛿 𝑝 𝐻 𝑝 𝐿 >80GV <0.3% at 95% C.L. No significant seasonal variation observed in all observables.

Conclusions Projection of 95% upper limits on ẟ to 2024 Sez. Milano-Bicocca Conclusions Projection of 95% upper limits on ẟ to 2024 Current limit in e+/e-with 4.5 years of data 16 < E < 350 GeV