Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOAA and OAR Approaches to Research Planning Alexander E. MacDonald PhD Deputy Assistant Administrator for Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes Office.
Advertisements

Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.
1 IOOS Status of Planning & Implementation Background –Milestones Implementation Plan, Part I –Governance of the IOOS Implementation Plan, Part II –The.
Development of an Ocean Observing System for the Gulf of Mexico: A Gulf Numerical Laboratory Background Mission Statement: Vision Elements of Design and.
The National Office for Integrated and Sustained Ocean Observing and Prediction Eric J. Lindstrom, Director, Ocean.US Worth D. Nowlin, Jr, U.S. GOOS Steering.
ADM-10/26/ Architecture and Data Management for the U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System (IEOS) First Steps Kathy Fontaine, NASA USGEO ADM Vice.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Moving Forward: NOAA & Earth Observation Systems Mr. Timothy R.E. Keeney Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Oceanographic.
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
Mary E. Kicza Assistant Administrator for NOAA Satellite and Information Services Responsible for Responsible for providing timely access to global environmental.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
Community Resilience: It Takes A Village Civil Society Leadership Symposium December 8, 2009 Margaret A. Davidson NOAA’s Coastal Services Center.
Plan Development Workshop NOAA Coastal Services Center Charleston, SC November 2-5, 2009 Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act.
James H. Butler, Acting Director NOAA Strategic Planning Moving NOAA into the 21 st Century Third GOES-R User Conference May 2004, Boulder, Colorado.
Integrated Ocean Observing System -- IOOS -- United States Contribution to the Global Ocean Observing System Kurt Schnebele Ocean.US Deputy of Data Management.
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Center for Satellite Applications and Research External Review Alfred M.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
CORE Public Policy Forum Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator.
US IOOS Independent Cost Estimate: Summary Information.
Presenters: David M. Kennedy, Director, NOAA Office of Ocean & Coastal Resource Management Margaret A. Davidson, Director, NOAA Coastal Services Center.
1 An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. 2 The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 16-member, independent, bi- partisan group 26 scientific advisors 16.
NOAA 101 Sarah Schoedinger NOAA, Office of Education November 2, 2006 An overview of the agency for the NOAA/NSTA Symposium on the Ocean’s Role in Weather.
Office of Education and Sustainable Development The Challenge To Create A NOAA Education/Outreach Program.
“America’s NOAA National Weather Service: Protecting Lives, Livelihoods, and A Way of Life” Water Resources Vision 2020 Deliver a broader suite of improved.
FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.
The State Climatologist Program and a National Climate Services Initiative Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
High Impact Weather Emerging challenge identified at CASXVI Mariane DIOP KANE Mariane DIOP KANE CASMG9, Geneva, April 2014.
AMS 85 Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere | NOAA Assistant Administrator January 10, 2005 From Information.
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Moving Towards GEOSS Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere Future National Operational.
CIRES-CDC Institutional Partnership Western Water Assessment Review Randall M. Dole, Director Climate Diagnostics Center September 2001.
Why We Are Here Eric Lindstrom, Co-chair Interagency Ocean Observation Committee Great Lakes Industry Workshop June 21, 2011.
American Fisheries Society Incoming Governing Board Breakfast Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration September 15,
Marlene Kaplan Office of Education and Sustainable Development.
VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator Space Enterprise Council, U.S.
IP & Weather Decision Models VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere NOAA Administrator November.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction: “Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” An Overview.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Sustainable Beaches: Weather Impacts VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
Information for a Sustainable World The NEW. ‘Mission to Planet Earth’ Study Earth as a complex interdependent system Understand and prepare for global.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
NOAA Vision and Mission Goals Pedro J. Restrepo, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Scientist, Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA/NWS First Q2 Workshop (Q2 - "Next.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
GCOOS Governance Team Andrew Clark, Harris Corporation Cortis Cooper, ChevronTexaco Ann Jochens, Texas A&M University Buzz Martin, Texas General Land Office.
2017/18 SANSA Annual Performance Plan
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Update on US Activities
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
WMO STRATEGIC PLAN & OPERATING PLAN
NATIONAL LANDSAT POLICY Executive Office of the President
Coordinating Operational Oceanography and Marine Meteorology
7th EU Research FP has ten themes defined in order:
High Impact Weather Emerging challenge identified at CASXVI
Cg-18 Special Session Topic 1 New Initiatives and Needs
The value cycle discovery-translation-application
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations Recommendations for the Implementation and Operation of an Integrated Ocean Observing System Remarks to the Marine Navigation Services Community July 30, 2004 Kenneth W. Turgeon Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations

USCOP Objective: To recommend a comprehensive national ocean policy that would provide for: Protection of life and property against natural and manmade hazards Responsible stewardship of ocean and coastal resources Protection of the marine environment and prevention of marine pollution Enhancement of marine-related commerce and transportation

USCOP Objective: To recommend a comprehensive national ocean policy that would provide for: Expansion of human knowledge of the marine environment Investment, development, improvement & application of marine technologies Close cooperation and partnering among federal agencies and the private sector Preserving the role of the US as a leader in ocean and coastal activities

USCOP Position on an IOOS The Commission strongly endorses creation and implementation of an Integrated Ocean Observing System The nation has the technology and the expertise to develop an IOOS, and its implementation is long overdue

Existing Situation Currently, the United States has more than forty coastal ocean observing systems, operated independently or jointly by various federal, state, industry, and academic entities – BUT THEY ARE NOT TIED TOGETHER They measure different variables at different scales for different purposes

USCOP Vision for an IOOS The Commission’s vision is for the IOOS to be the “saltwater” equivalent of our weather observing, forecasting and warning system We need an ocean observing system that satisfies real world needs, just as the National Weather Service does with its suite of environmental forecasts and warnings. Anything less will not garner the national support necessary to its success and maintenance over time. Admiral James D. Watkins Chair U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy

The Commission’s Vision for the IOOS is Strongly User Oriented To justify large federal investments in the IOOS, the system must result in tangible benefits for a broad and diverse user community, including the general public, scientists, resource managers, coastal managers, emergency responders, policy makers, private industry, educators, and officials responsible for homeland security

Critical Attributes of an IOOS Sustained over time Operational nowcasts & forecasts & warnings Partnership of government, industry, academia and others Utilizes land-based, water-based, air-based & space-based observation technologies Strong coastal component Provides timely generic & tailored information Broad user community incl. general public Regional/local, national & global coverage Linked to other Earth observing systems Transition of R&D to operations & products

IOOS is Really ISOCOOPS Observing and Prediction Integrated and Sustained Ocean and Coastal Operational Observing and Prediction System

Cost of an IOOS The Commission estimates the cost of operating an IOOS is on the order of $750 million per year; this includes dedicated satellite operations and data collection, assimilation and dissemination costs Economic, societal and environmental benefits will far outweigh the cost, but these benefits have not yet been fully calculated nor well articulated

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 1) The National Ocean Council should make development and implementation of a sustained, national Integrated Ocean Observing System a central focus of its leadership and coordination role.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 2) Ocean.US, with NOC oversight, should be responsible for planning the national IOOS. NOAA should be the lead federal agency for implementing and operating the IOOS, with extensive interagency coordination and subject to NOC approval.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 3) Congress should amend the National Oceanographic Partnership Act to formally establish Ocean.US, with a budget appropriate to carry out its mission. Ocean.US should report to the National Ocean Council’s (NOC’s) Committee on Ocean Science, Education, Technology, and Operations (COSETO).

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 4) Ocean.US should proactively seek input from coastal and ocean stakeholder communities to build cross-sector support for the IOOS and develop consensus about operational requirements

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 5) Ocean.US with NOC oversight should develop a set of core variables to be collected by all components of the national IOOS

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 6) Ocean.US should recommend priorities and long-term plans for space-based missions as an essential component of the national IOOS.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 7) NOAA, NSF, Navy and NASA should require investigators who receive federal funding related to ocean research observatories, including the NSF Ocean Observatories Initiative, to develop plans for transferring new technologies to an operational mode in the IOOS  

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 8) Congress should transfer NASA’s Earth environmental observing satellites, along with associated resources, to NOAA to achieve continued operations. NOAA and NASA should work together to ensure the smooth transition of each Earth environmental observing satellite after its launch.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 9) Congress should fund the IOOS as a line item in NOAA’s budget, to be spent subject to NOC direction and approval. IOOS funds should be appropriated without fiscal year limitation. NOAA should develop a streamlined process for distributing IOOS funds to other federal and nonfederal partners. lined process for distributing IOOS funds to other federal and nonfederal partners.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 10) The NOC should oversee coordination of the IOOS with other existing and planned terrestrial, watershed, atmospheric, and biological observation and information collection systems, with the ultimate goal of developing a national Earth Observing System.

USCOP IOOS Recommendations From the Preliminary Report 11) The National Ocean Council (NOC) should promote international coordination and capacity building in the field of global ocean observations