Using metrics to change the narrative

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
The Carnegie Classification for Institutions Engaged with Community: Challenges, Benefits, and Understandings from the Documentation Process Amy Driscoll,
Presented by: Eileen Harvey – Senior Human Resources Consultant June 2015 UCL Senior Promotions Academic, Research and Teaching Fellow Staff.
Building Scholarship to Support College Baccalaureates… MacEwan’s Experience Community College Baccalaureate Association 2007 Annual Conference.
WHAT ARE RESEARCH METRICS AND DO WE NEED THEM? LESLIE CHAN UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
Digital Libraries: Redefining the Library Value Paradigm Peter E Sidorko The University of Hong Kong 3 December 2010.
Improving user engagement in a data repository with web analytics LITA Forum November 7, 2013 Heather CoatesSummer Durrant Digital Scholarship & Data Management.
15/06/2012 slide 1 OA and Research Information Josh Brown Programme Manager for Research Information Management and Scholarly Communications.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Promotion & Tenure Outreach: An Emerging Faculty-Librarian Partnership Oxford University 7/6/09 Photographed by Brenna ©Brenna K. Helmstutler, M.S.,M.L.I.S.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
Liaison Futures: View from a University Librarian Anne R. Kenney ARL Liaison Librarian Institute June 2015.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences WELCOME Assistant Professor P&T Workshop Defining Scholarship and P&T Portfolio Development April 22, 2015.
Tenure and Promotion Workshop November 1, Workshop Logistics Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion criteria Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion.
Documentation and Assessment of Scholarship in Extension and Engagement: A National Perspective Amy Driscoll Associate Senior Scholar Carnegie Foundation.
Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: The Experience at Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia XXVII Annual Charleston ConferenceNovember.
Altmetrics: Where are we and where are we going?.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
Talking about the Scholarship Repository June 21, 2016 Charlotte Roh, University of San Francisco.
Shared Governance In the past four years, there has been a significant, positive change in the collaborative and collegial relationship between the Provost,
Scholarly Communication Services: Repository-based Library Publishing OLA Preconference Feb. 2, 2011 Adrian K. Ho The University of Western Ontario.
Demonstrating impact as a practitioner- researcher FORCE16 | Portland, OR | Monday, April 18, 2016 Heather Coates IUPUI University Library Center for Digital.
Research Distribution Matters: The Boise State University Strategy Marilyn Moody, Dean, University Library Boise State University
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
Promotion & Tenure Workshop
Plenary Presentation:
Measuring Scholarly and Public Impact: Let’s Talk Metrics
Assistant Professor P&T Workshop Definition of Scholarship
Lauren Hays MidAmerica Nazarene
Fresno State Digital Repository
Information Resources Strategy: Continuing to Provide the Resources You Need Fall 2016.
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Promoting Faculty Scholarship through the USFSP Digital Archive
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM
You’re starting a what?: Talking to faculty, staff, and students about
National planning for Open Research euroCRIS 2017, 30 May 2017
Open research: from the perspective of Wellcome
Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian
WHAT CAN THE CENTER FOR FAME DO FOR YOU?
WP2. Excellent university for the researchers
Extension Scholarship
What, why and best practices in open research
Beyond Survival in the Academy
OpenCon 2016 | Washington, DC
Toward an inclusive campus community:
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
SFU Open Access Policy Endorsed by Senate January 9, 2017
THE OFFICE FOR SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION/ Responsible Metrics at Kent
Initial Outreach to Local Libraries (a primer)
THE OFFICE FOR SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION/ Launch Event
Assistant Professor P&T Workshop Definition of Scholarship
Statewide A&OER Efforts of Libraries
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
Opening Access: Increasing Scholarly Impact with
Engaging Institutional Leadership
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
Elements and Altmetric at Virginia Tech
Measuring Your Research Impact
….part of the OSU Libraries' suite of digital library tools…
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Education Portfolio Sean Elliott, MD.
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Getting Organized Governance Structures of Statewide OER Projects
OFFICE OF EQUITY AND DIVERSITY
Facilitating open science at Florida State University Libraries
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

Using metrics to change the narrative Slide 0: I’m delighted to be here today. The Charleston Conference November 3, 2016 Heather L. Coates, MLS, MS | @IandPangurBan | #changethenarrative

Kristi Palmer Jere Odell Associate Dean of Digital Scholarship https://ulib.iupui.edu/digitalscholarship/people/kristipalmer Jere Odell Scholarly Communication Librarian https://ulib.iupui.edu/digitalscholarship/people/jereodell First, I have to acknowledge that much of what I will talk about today was done by my colleagues.

I want to talk (briefly) today about how metrics have helped us to expand the conversation, change policy, and change practice at IUPUI. Metrics have been both a way to start the conversation and evidence for the benefits of changing practices. These activities are helping to change the narrative about what counts as scholarship & how we value it. More specifically, what products, evidence, and impact can be used in P&T dossiers and how they should be evaluated by committees.

Open Access =/= poor quality or lack of peer review Publications are the only product that counts for getting a job and P&T Publications are our scholarly record Impact =/= Journal Impact Factor Metrics measure the quality of scholarship Metrics alone measure the value or impact of scholarship Professional practice and service are not real scholarship This is the narrative we have been working to change over the past several years.

Open Access is a way to ensure everyone has access to scholarship All the scholarship we produce has value All the scholarship we produce is part of the scholarly record Metrics are useful indicators for different flavors of impact Metrics + expert review can the speak to the value and impact of scholarship Impact is complex and best indicated by a mix of metrics & qualitative evidence presented in context Professional practice and service enhance scholarship and expand its value This is the rather pragmatic narrative we would like to see prevail in the next 3-5 years.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Economic Development (Indiana) IUPUI Values Civic Engagement Collaboration Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Economic Development (Indiana) Interdisciplinary Work & Publication Open Access Public Scholars/ Scholarship R&CA in Urban Environment RISE Translational Research Much of our success at IUPUI has been facilitated by local support. Our context may be very different than yours. What you see here are some of the values espoused in our P&T guidelines. We are supporting faculty and administration in reporting and evaluating scholarship in ways that promote and demonstrate our commitment to these values.

You can learn more about these values from our campus mission https://www.iupui.edu/about/vision-mission.html

https://academicaffairs.iupui.edu/PromotionTenure/IUPUI-Guidelines and our P&T guidelines. https://academicaffairs.iupui.edu/PromotionTenure/IUPUI-Guidelines

Faculty Governance Education Practice Promotion & Tenure Guidelines – campus, school, & departmental levels Open Access Policy (Fall 2014) Education Workshops Consultations How have we changed practice to support and perpetuate this narrative? Engagement in faculty governance has led to addition of OA as a campus value and we are collaborating with specific schools and departments to revise guidelines at those levels. Our education efforts include workshops & consultations to help faculty make a stronger case for promotion and tenure. We have been able to change practice by modelling the practices we advocate for, openly discussing how those practices are affecting our own professional advancement, and by establishing an Open Access Fund. Practice Modelling the practices we want to see Discuss impact on professional advancement Open Access Fund

Through our education and practice efforts, we are helping faculty to make their case for P&T using a broader list of products (beyond the publication) and a richer selection of evidence, including altmetrics and qualitative evidence to supplement citation-based metrics. There are links to slidedecks and other materials related to this area at the end.

This year, two collaborators and I began developing a Metrics Toolkit with the support of FORCE11. The goal of this project is to support the responsible use of metrics by scholars, hiring committees, and P&T committees in evaluating individual scholars.

OA Policy Participation Rate IUPUI ScholarWorks 10,000 items deposited 48,022 downloads 70,261 abstract views Our governance and practice efforts have led to significant growth of open access at IUPUI. OA Policy Participation Rate 2015-2016 2582/4914 53% 2016 (projected) 1936/2800 69%

Personal Good Public Good Increase your visibility Control dissemination of your scholarly products Get credit for all your scholarship Select from a broader and richer array of evidence to indicate the attention, discussion, engagement, and reuse Transparency Public participation and engagement Improved or new products and services Innovation Enable validation of published findings Improved efficiency of public services Evaluation of public policy New knowledge Open Access & Open Data are not the end goals. Openness is a means to build a scholarly commons that ensures equitable access, balances rewards for processes with products, integrity with novelty, and enables attribution without obstructing reuse. We can argue about how far we have to go and how to get there, but let’s remember why openness matters. The challenge is that the priorities of researchers vary greatly. We have to be able to articulate how openness enables them to achieve their professional advancement goals. Metrics are one way to do that.

Digital Scholarship & Data Management Librarian Heather L. Coates Digital Scholarship & Data Management Librarian IUPUI University Library Center for Digital Scholarship @IandPangurBan coateshl.wordpress.com http://ulib.iupui.edu/digitalscholarship/ Thanks for your attention. If you want to continue the conversation after this session, you can find me on Twitter.

More Information Odell, J., Coates, H., & Palmer, K. (2016). Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure Driving institutional change. College & Research Libraries News, 77(7), 322-325. Altmetrics for Team Science: http://www.slideshare.net/goldenphizzwizards/metrics-for-team-science Coates, Heather (2016): Heather Coates dossier for promotion & tenure at IUPUI (figshare). doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3413698.v2 On the “inevitable rise” of gold OA at IUPUI: http://ulib.iupui.edu/digitalscholarship/blog/gold-open-access-rise-iupui-leads- indiana-oa-articles IUPUI Open Access Publishing Fund Report: July 2013-June 2015: http://hdl.handle.net/1805/10179 Why Open Research? http://whyopenresearch.org/ FOSTER EU Project: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/

Image Credits Publish: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=article&i=74762 Evaluate: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=peer+review&i=210141 Article: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=article&i=74762 Book: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=book&i=547809 Binary code: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=binary+code&i=177042 Data stream: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=data+stream&i=160443