CLIC Common RF-girder study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Option – Material Choices Frame Strong-backs Magnet Modules Definitions.
Advertisements

Enrique Calvo Alamillo Madrid 1 March Index: 1.Proposal for a DHCAL m3 module. 2.Numerical simulations for a m3 module. 3.Extrapolation of the m3.
Goals : 1- To conceive and build a self-supporting mechanical structure. 2- The concept can be extended to ILD and SiD 3- Keep cost as low as possible.
Prof Awad S. Hanna Concrete Structures Concrete Structures.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Stability of Mechanical Systems S. Sharma and V. Ravindranath.
Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior R. Raatikainen.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Mechanical design, analysis and integration of pre-alignment systems for CLIC M.Anastasopoulos / BE-ABP-SU.
Bedplate The bedplate is foundation on which the crosshead diesel engine is built. It must be rigid enough to support the weight of the rest of the engine.
Team Wrecked Week 9 Deliverables: Engineering Analysis.
CTC, Two-beam module program (WP CTC-004) CLIC Modules (boundary conditions, technical system design and integration) CDR modules Prototypes.
1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA
ELENA Support system 6/11/2014 Antti Kolehmainen on behalf of WP Support system
Team: Wolfgang Burkert, Haimo Jöhri, Uwe Barth Mechanical precision and vibration behavior of mechanical supports Johan Wickström GFA-ATK.
Imad Laktineh (in behalf of Enrique Calvo Alamillo) Arlington 11 March 2010.
ABSTRACT The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is currently under development at CERN as a potential multi-TeV e + e – collider. The manufacturing and assembly.
Status of Activities at CERN
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
Frame Overview A36 Steel square tubing and plate Frame will rest on four wheels or two air skids 90” Long, 30” wide- outside CG envelope Two carts for.
1 Thermal tests planning for mock-up TM0 Thermal tests planning for CLIC prototype module type 0 May 30th,
1 Assembly and installation of TM0 Lab components Assembly and installation of TM0 Lab components F. Rossi.
Simulation of the CLIC Compressor Cavity, Luca Dassa (EN-MME/ES)10/04/ di 10 Simulation of CLIC Pulse Compressor Cavity Report, April 10th, 2013.
Engineering design of the V-supports J.Huopana Input from: G.Riddone, A.Samoshkin, R.Nousiainen, D.Gudkov, N.Gazis.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
CLIC module Experimental program for module array Module review, June 22 nd 2015Elena Daskalaki, BE-RF-MK.
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
Procurement for the Supporting Systems
STATIC AND MODAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE CLIC MAIN BEAM BPM SUPPORT M. Esposito, EN-MME The research leading to these results has received funding from the European.
Dmitry Gudkov BE/RF CLIC Module Working Group Test Module Type 1 (LAB). Design and integration. 3D model Ref: ST
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.
Epument Girder simulation and Module Showroom upgrade For CLIC meeting 2015 Petri Tikka, Helsinki Institute of Physics focusing on exploring the possibilities.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Deformations and stresses in the flux return yoke A.Efremov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov Darmstadt,
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
Status of the CLIC module R&D G. Riddone on behalf of the CLIC module WG (special contributions from A. Samoshkin, D. Gudkov, A. Solodko, N. Gazis)
Two-beam module layout
Ad-hoc Transportation test of «CLIC module»
Divisional Engineer/East/Ranchi South Eastern Railway
Update on the DB Girders FE Analyses
Structural Considerations for Bridges
SuperB IFR mechanics of IFR prototype – by C. Fanin
TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system
Alignment methods developed for the validation of the thermal and mechanical behavior of the Two Beam Test Modules for the CLIC project Hélène MAINAUD.
Thermal-Structural Finite Element Analysis of CLIC module T0#2
Thermal-Structural Finite Element Analysis of CLIC module T0#2
Zach Bolotin Cody Hatch Robert Swartz
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Module roadmap to end of 2017
KNU IP-BPM and Reference cavity
Preliminary Y-chamber specifications – First draft
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
Thermal review of CLIC module
CLIC WORKSHOP January 2013 BODYCOTE Your main sub-contractor for thermal processes Raymond SAEZ-Patrick JACQUOT.
SPARC Review Committee Meeting
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
Installation plan for LAB modules
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Stainless Steel Water Well Casing.
Concrete Structures DR. Nabil Dmaidi.
Structural Components
Thermal test (lab modules)
STEEL PLATES.
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Presentation transcript:

CLIC Common RF-girder study Sami Haavisto, 05.07.2017

My assignment Study the possibilities and options for common RF-girder Manufacturing Tolerances Design (Alignment and support) (Fixation/snake system to other modules) (Materials)

Current focus has been Simple models of different options for the girder Simple stress and deformation simulations to the models 6 different models with simulations already made Standard sections (IPE, etc.) Stainless steel for weld options, Epument 145/B for cast Supported from both ends of DB and MB girder Simulations: 300kg weight on MB, 120kg on DB

Weld option #1 Weight 22.3kg (for comparison) Max deformation 35μm

Weld option #2 Weight 45.6kg Max deformation 41μm Weights more and doesn’t bring any added benefit compared to other weld options

Weld option #3 Weight 23.2kg Max deformation 36μm

Weld option #4 Weight 28.8kg Max deformation 29μm

Cast option #1 Weight 43kg Max deformation 8μm Epument

Cast option #2 Weight 44.5kg Max deformation 7μm Epument

Next steps A design of machined plate (components fixed to it, beam alignment with plate) Tolerances possible and reasonable to achieve for girder Eliminate unnecessary options Simulations on effects of thermal expansion