Utah County Elementary Schools Seismic Hazards Survey Azimuth Engineering Ashley Blood, Cody Hatch, Amy Fredrickson Problem Statement: Many geologists.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Country Statement to the Regional Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas II Session – The Virgin Islands Presented by Simone Lettsome-Nibbs.
Advertisements

During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
Susan Vocea & Mereoni Ketewai SPC - SOPAC. Applications Early warning Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessments Damage assessment Identification of safe.
Earthquake Mitigation I: Techniques for Reducing Earthquake Hazard “Earthquake Hazards and Risk Mitigation in Western Washington and Oregon” Keoni Wong,
SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop La Serena, Chile December Seismic Retrofit of Existing Observatories Chile Observatories Earthquake.
Charles SCAWTHORN Junji KIYONO Kyoto University Earthquake Risk Reduction 3- Mitigation and ERR Program Development 1. Concepts and Terminology 2. Hazard,
RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY FROM THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
On Earthquake Preparedness in Israel Dr. Avi Shapira Chairman of the Steering Committee Ministry of National Infrastructures National Earthquake Preparedness.
Rapid Screening of Buildings for Seismic Retrofit Assessment Murat Saatcioglu PhD,P.Eng. Professor and University Research Chair Department of Civil Engineering.
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
DOES YOUR DATA TALK TO YOU?. A NEW SOFTWARE PLATFORM FOR THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA.
UTAH COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS SEISMIC HAZARDS SURVEY AZIMUTH ENGINEERING AMY FREDRICKSON CODY HATCH ASHLEY BLOOD.
Outline: Lecture 4 Risk Assessment I.The concepts of risk and hazard II.Shaking hazard of Afghanistan III.Seismic zone maps IV.Construction practice What.
Earthquakes.
Environmental Assessment Public Information Meeting – September 2010 Realignment of a Portion of a Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System (ULS)
Assignment 10/ Copy down the notes, cornell style. I have put stars next to the notes which are usually highlighted Answer the Concept Checks.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Missouri Geological Survey Joe Gillman The Central U.S. is Earthquake Country: The Science Behind Earthquakes Hazard Preparedness Response.
Building Codes. Building codes: collapse prevention.
Potential Uses of OEF at PG&E Norm Abrahamson Mar 16, 2015.
Westminster Kingsway College Professional Chef Diploma Unit 703 S.Greubel.
Earthquakes & Society –tsunami –seismic gap Objectives Discuss factors that affect the amount of damage done by an earthquake. Explain some of the factors.
Earthquake Risk and the Workplace David Bonowitz, S.E. Chair, SEAONC Existing Buildings Committee Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation.
Chapter 5 Study Guide Friday, February 26, Section 1 Understand what a fault is. Be able to describe the different types of faults. Be able to discuss.
Warm Up 11/1 Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of S waves? a. They cannot be transmitted through water or air. b. They shake particles at.
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
WHY DO WE LOOK FOR FAULTS?? Geologists of the end of the 19th century (at that time geologists were more like adventurers rather than scientists!) realized.
Natural Hazards Science: Reducing America’s Risk from Floods David Ford David Ford Consulting Engineers.
19.4 – Earthquakes & Society. Damages  Death and injuries  Collapse of buildings  Landslides  Fires  Explosions  Flood waters.
 Explain how earthquake-hazard level is determined.  Compare methods of earthquake forecasting.  Describe five ways to safeguard buildings against.
{ Risk Management. Step 1. Identify the hazards Identify all hazards associated with the systems of work Risk Management Four Step Process.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 201 Data Available for Map 3 Data available on corridor level.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS PART II A– PAKISTAN’S EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
Destruction from Earthquakes Spring Seismic Vibrations 8.3 Destruction from Earthquakes  The damage to buildings and other structures from earthquake.
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo A Professional Law Corporation CERRITOS ● FRESNO ● PLEASANTON ● RIVERSIDE ● SACRAMENTO ● SAN DIEGO Board Member Liability.
Division of Engineering Geotechnical & Engineering Services Branch Project Geology Section in West Sacramento Rob Barry Supervising Engineering Geologist.
ADVANCED EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN SUMIT KUMAR CIVIL ENGG. HALDIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY UNDER GUIDANCE OF:- PROF. M.M.BAG.
Aneeka Nunnikhoven 2 nd period.  Governor Gary Herbert  In Utah earthquakes don’t occur on a regular basis. The general public are not informed about.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:.
Earthquake Safety: Building codes
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes
Earthquakes By Ms. Zavala Date.
California Real Estate Principles, 10.1 Edition
Project planning The systems life cycle.
Engineering Seismology
8.3 Destruction from Earthquakes
Welcome to Earthquake Engineering
Plate Tectonic Animations
QNJAC Contractors Sub-Committee
10 DEAD; DOZENS INJURED IN TOWN OF 85,000
Electrical Safe System of Work (ESSW) - Volt Sticks
7.3 Measuring and Predicting Earthquakes
GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BRIDGE PROJECTS
VERMONT’S ROCKFALL HAZARD RATING SYSTEM
Quantitative Risk Assessment
When the Big One Comes A Study of Hazards Associated with a Major Earthquake Along Utah’s Highly-Populated Wasatch Front Authored by Kevin Franke Civil.
Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
8.3 – Destruction from Earthquakes
NOVEMBER 18, 2015 Richmond W. Wall Senior Vice President
Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes
Review and analysis of seismic alert communication issues
Earthquake Hazard Chapter F5
Formal handover of construction pack to operations
Presentation transcript:

Utah County Elementary Schools Seismic Hazards Survey Azimuth Engineering Ashley Blood, Cody Hatch, Amy Fredrickson Problem Statement: Many geologists predict the near future will bring a major earthquake (M7.0) along the Wasatch Fault, which cuts through Utah County. Many school buildings in this county were built before seismic building codes were introduced, which puts schoolchildren at risk many hours each day. Results: The RVS results show that 22% of the elementary schools require further investigation to evaluate the extent of seismic hazards. This was due to vertical and plan irregularities, the use of unreinforced masonry, and construction before the implementation of modern seismic building codes. These schools require detailed evaluations by professional engineers to assess the extent of the seismic hazard. If substantial hazards are found, then renovations may be required to bring the schools up to seismic code. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify elementary school buildings with potential risk of significant damage during a major earthquake. This was accomplished by performing Rapid Visual Screenings (RVS), or “sidewalk surveys,” to evaluate the seismic hazards at all 93 elementary schools in Utah County. Map showing results of RVS Breakdown of screened schools by building type Results of iRVS database input. Number of at risk schools and safe schools based on RVS scores