First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Percutaneous Therapy of Pulmonic and Mitral Valve Disease Atman P. Shah MD FACC FSCAI Director, Coronary Care Unit Assistant Professor of Medicine The.
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
When Does Baseline Left Ventricular Function Influence Survival Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation? —The CoreValve Australia New Zealand Study.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
6-Month Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With a Novel Repositionable Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PhD,
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
THE RISE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS: A PROPENSITY-SCORE ANALYSIS FROM TWO MULTICENTER REGISTRIES COMPARING SUTURELESS AND TRANS-CATHETER.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Conflicts of interests for Leif Thuesen, M.D.
University Heart Center Hamburg
TAVR Pearls Addressing the Shortcomings of the Current TAVR Generation
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Techniques in Valve-in-Valve TAVR Vinod H. Thourani, MD Professor of Surgery and Medicine Chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory Hospital Midtown Co-Director:
The Impact of Prior Stroke on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Romain Didier, MD;
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
1 Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director, Interventional Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Background & Study Design
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Ian T. Meredith AM MonashHeart, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP,
Costs of Periprocedural Complications in Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from The PARTNER Trial Suzanne V. Arnold,
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Lotus Valve with Depth Guard First Report from the RESPOND Extension Study Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD,
Initial center experience with the St
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable, Retrievable, Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California,Davis.
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
First Report of One-Year Outcomes of the REPRISE I Feasibility Study of the Repositionable Lotus Aortic Valve Replacement System Ian T. Meredith.
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of a Stenotic Aortic Valve through Implantation of the Lotus Valve System 30-day Outcomes for the First 60 Patients.
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of a Stenotic Aortic Valve through Implantation of the Lotus Valve System Discharge/7-Day Outcomes in the REPRISE.
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
Final Five-Year Outcomes Following Implantation of the Promus Element® Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in.
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
The Impact of Live Case Transmission on Patient Outcomes during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the VERITAS Study Dr. Ron Waksman.
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
Summary and Conclusion
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Progress with the Sadra Medical Lotus™ Valve System
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Second Generation Valves: What Will Be Different?
REPRISE I The Sadra Lotus Valve for TVAR
University Heart Center Hamburg
S.G. Worthley, MB, BS, PhD., S. Redwood, MD, PhD.,
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Procedural Characteristics
Presentation transcript:

First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I Feasibility Study TCT-615 Ian T. Meredith AM, MBBS, PhD1; Stephen G. Worthley, MD2; Robert J. Whitbourn, MBBS, BMedSc, BSc3; Joseph Montarello, MBBS2; Andrew E. Newcomb, MBBS3; Dominic J. Allocco, MD4; Keith D. Dawkins, MD4 1MonashHeart, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; 2Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 3St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; 4Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA Introduction & Study Design Patients Safety Valve Hemodynamics Baseline Characteristics (N=11) Age (years) 83.0±3.6 Gender (female) 11/11 STS Score (%) 4.9±2.5 Logistic euroSCORE (%) 9.5±4.4 NYHA Class III or IV 5/11 Diabetes, medically treated 2/11 Hypertension, medically treated 10/11 History of coronary artery disease History of cerebrovascular accident Atrial fibrillation STUDY OBJECTIVE: Assess acute safety & performance of the Lotus Valve System (23mm valve) for TAVR DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm feasibility study PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Device success (VARC-1 definition) without in-hospital MACCE through discharge/7 days ANALYSIS OBJECTIVE: to assess the long-term (3-year) outcomes with the Lotus Valve Patients aged ≥70 years with: Aortic valve stenosis and NYHA Class ≥II AVA <1.0cm2 (or AVA index <0.6cm2/m2) plus either MPG >40mmHg or jet velocity >4m/s High risk for surgical AVR Aortic Annulus size 19-22mm (23mm valve used) Safety Event Rates At 3 Years n/11 MACCE 2 All cause mortalitya 1 Peri-procedural MI (≤72 hours) Major stroke Urgent or emergent conversion to surgery or repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction Life-threatening/disabling bleedingb Acute kidney injury – Stage 2 or Stage 3 Major vascular complicationc Major bleedingd 3 Conduction disturbance requiring new pacemaker 4 Myocardial infarction Minor stroke a: Death (non-cardiovascular; uncontrolled sepsis) at 843 days post procedure b: Events at 14 days (pericardial effusion from pacemaker implant) and 20 days (GI bleed) post procedure c: Left femoral artery dissection treated by cross-over contralateral balloon angioplasty d: All unrelated to TAVR access 53.920.9 13.73.7 11.73.0 15.54.4 15.44.6 15.64.4 0.70.2 1.50.2 1.60.2 Mean AV Gradient (mmHg) Mean Aortic Valve Area (cm2) n=11 n=8 Measurement P value Mean AV Gradient Mean AVA Baseline to Discharge <0.001 Baseline to 3 Years Discharge to 3 Years 0.542 0.909 P values from repeated measures and random effects ANOVA model Independent Core Lab adjudication NYHA Class to 3 Years Aortic Valve Regurgitation Intent-To-Treat (N=11) No Lotus Valve Implanted (N=0) Lotus Valve Implanted (N=11) 30-Day Clinical Follow-Up 100% (11/11) 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up Available or had a Clinical Event 90.9% (10/11) Patients (%) P=0.004 n=11 n=8 None Trivial Moderate Mild Severe Paravalvular Regurgitation Patients (%) N=11 N=11 N=11 N=11 N=8 New Safety Events Between 2 Years and 3 Years Conclusions Transient ischemic attack in 1 patient at Day 1037; resolved without residual effects Thromboembolic stroke (minor) in 1 patient at Day 818; resolved without residual effects Patient had a history of atrial fibrillation and experienced non-cardiovascular death (uncontrolled sepsis) at Day 843 Three-year results from the REPRISE I study demonstrate excellent valve function with minimal paravalvular regurgitation and low clinical event rates. These data support the safety and performance of the Lotus Valve for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Disclosures: IM: Consultant Fees/Honoraria/Speaker’s Bureau: Boston Scientific (significant); SW: Grant support/Research contract: Medtronic, St Jude Medical (significant), Consultant Fees/Honoraria/Speaker’s Bureau: Medtronic (modest); AN: Grant support/Research contract: Boston Scientific (modest), Consultant Fees/Honoraria/Speaker’s Bureau: Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences (modest); DJA & KDD: Salary & Equity: Boston Scientific (significant); RW & JM: none Poster presented at: Transcatheter and Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2015, October 13, 2015; San Francisco, CA, USA. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY