North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Riverside County, CA May 27, 2010.
Advertisements

Flood Map Modernization in North Dakota North Dakota State Water Commission FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
Cooperating Technical State (CTS) Statewide Mapping… North Carolina’s Pioneering Effort John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Tim.
Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E.,
Alabama’s Floodplain Management Program Tom Littlepage Alabama Office of Water Resources.
FEMA Update: Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP Presented on behalf of FEMA by David I. Maurstad, PBS&J.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
Update on Hazus AAL Study and Data
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Flood Risk Mapping Project Identifying the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME] Flood Risk Mapping Project.
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
1 Changes to Alabama Flood Maps Impacts to Flood Insurance Presented By: Leslie A. Durham, P.E. ADECA Office of Water Resources January 23, 2014.
In coordination with FEMA Scoping Meeting Lake County, California February 19, 2010.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Flood Mitigation Section South Carolina Map Modernization Initiative Update Pee Dee GIS Users Group Meeting.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #3 December 12, 2000.
NC Floodplain Mapping Program North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Becoming a Cooperating Technical State.
Proven People... Proven Technology... Proven Results Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Management Module Katherine Hermann, CFM, Dewberry Ken Logsdon,
NC LiDAR ( ) Success in other States – (Zsolt Nagy – AECOM) 1.What was the business driver for NC LiDAR? 2.What was the coordination approach?
Utilizing a Basinwide Approach for the North Carolina Flood Mapping Program John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Gib Jones, P.E.,
North Carolina Neuse River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings April 23, 24, and 25, 2001.
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps. What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and how do I use it?* A FIRM is a map created by the NFIP for floodplain.
CHAPTER 3 MAPS AND MAP CHANGES
Creating Depth Grid from a DFIRM FEMA Region VIII Mitigation GIS Team Wednesday, February 13, 2013.
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #6 March 20, 2001.
Advisory Base Flood Elevations: What Your Community Needs to Know Information for Floodplain Managers and Local Officials.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
Geospatial capabilities for a BEST MANAGED Georgia 1 Georgia Geospatial Advisory Council (GGAC) Business Case for Accurate Digital Elevation Data Acquisition.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center FEMA REGION III COASTAL MAPPING PROJECT May 19, 2011 Coastal Analyses and Outreach Robin Danforth, FEMA.
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Map Modernization History and Overview Bill Massey and Sam Crampton Dewberry South Florida Water Management.
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #2 November 14, 2000.
Predicting and Preparing for Natural Disasters Margaret A. Davidson Director NOAA Coastal Services Center June 7, 2005.
Back Creek Floodplain SEPTEMBER 2, Why are we here Introductions Almost 300 parcels affected by revised flood study of Back Creek Outline ◦History.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center COASTAL OUTREACH ADVISORY TEAM Kick-off Meeting November 19, 2010 FEMA Region III Coastal Mapping Project.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #7 April 17, 2001.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting October 2005 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION V
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [date] V [COMMUNITY NAME] FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #4 January 16, 2001.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #5 February 13, 2001.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
FEMA’s Risk MAP Coastal Updates – An Overview Jonathan E. Westcott, P.E. ASFPM 2012 National Conference San Antonio, TX Session D.8.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
Passaic County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 6th, :00-11:00.
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Ventura County, CA April 29, 2010.
1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting October 17, 2000.
FLOOD STUDY Burlington County, NJ FEMA REGION II November 29, 2010.
December 16 th, 2009 Presented by Jennifer DiLorenzo, M.S., CFM Sustainable Coastal Community Liaison Developed in Cooperation with the ASFPM 1 Floodplain.
West Virginia GIS Conference WV Flood Risk Mapping Status and Needs Lee Brancheau, GISP FEMA Region III, Risk Analysis Branch May 5, 2016 West Virginia.
Osceola County Floodplain Program Jennifer Nicholson, CFM Picture credit: Osceola Historical Society.
1 ODNR - Floodplain Management Program Ensure the wise management of Ohio’s floodplains Floodplain Management in Mahoning County August 16, 2016.
Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Hamilton & Suwannee Counties, FL February 8, 2016.
Prince George’s County Flood Forum March 23, 2017
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
N. F. I. P. Provides federally subsidized flood insurance
FEMA and Geospatial Coordination in West Virginia
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
<<County Name>> <<Date>>
CTP Program Updates Laura Algeo, FEMA HQ.
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES
Union County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting
Risk Modelling & Impact Forecasting Tools
Hamilton Township, Mercer County, NJ Hydrologic Evaluation and Water Resources Recommendations For Planning and Implementation Rutgers Cooperative Extension.
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 4 and 5, 2001 January 2, 2001

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Flood Mapping Program Overview January 2, 2001

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Purposes of the NFIP 1. Make flood insurance available 2. Identify floodplain areas and flood risk zones 3. Provide framework for a community’s floodplain management ordinances January 2, 2001

Importance of Updated Flood Hazard Information North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Importance of Updated Flood Hazard Information With up-to-date flood hazard data: Map users can make prudent siting, design, and flood insurance purchase decisions Communities can administer sound floodplain management programs January 2, 2001

North Carolina’s Flood Mapping Program North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program North Carolina’s Flood Mapping Program Program established to implement the Cooperating Technical State (CTS) Partnership with FEMA, signed September 15, 2000 Ownership and responsibility for Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) delegated to State January 2, 2001

Organization of the CTS Flood Mapping Program North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Organization of the CTS Flood Mapping Program January 2, 2001

Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project State’s vulnerability to hurricanes and flooding 14 federally declared disasters since 1989 Hurricane Floyd damages = $3.5 billion 4,117 uninsured/under-insured homes destroyed as result of Hurricane Floyd Accurate, up-to-date flood hazard information crucial to protect lives and property January 2, 2001

Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project Hurricane Floyd revealed flood hazard data and map limitations Age of North Carolina FIRMS 55% at least 10 years old 75% at least 5 years old FEMA’s mapping budget is finite North Carolina receives only one updated flood study for one county per year Many counties and communities lack resources to take on this responsibility January 2, 2001

Benefits of North Carolina’s CTS Program North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Benefits of North Carolina’s CTS Program Current, accurate data for sound siting and design decisions Better floodplain management to reduce long-term flood losses Updated data to alert at-risk property owners of the need for flood insurance Faster, less expensive FIRM updates January 2, 2001

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Program Components Developing flood hazard studies through community mapping needs analysis (Scoping) Acquiring high-resolution topographic data and accurate Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) Conducting engineering studies Generating countywide digital FIRMs (DFIRMs) Designing and implementing state-of-the-art, dynamic IT infrastructure Supporting real-time flood forecasting and inundation mapping capability January 2, 2001

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Digital FIRMs Base + Topography + Flood Data Digital FIRM = January 2, 2001

Digital FIRMs Digital FIRMs will be produced in a countywide format Will depict all flood hazard data FIRM panels will be consistent with USGS DOQ tiling scheme

Community Review and Due Process Preliminary FIRMs provided when Lumber River Basin Study is complete 90-day appeal period Preliminary Countywide FIRMs provided when adjacent basin studies are complete All appeals evaluated and resolved Final Effective FIRMs provided and made available by the State on its Information Management System

Additional Benefits of the CTS Program North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program Additional Benefits of the CTS Program Digital format to allow: More efficient, precise flood risk determinations Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis and planning Online access 24 hours a day DEMs will be useful for almost any engineering or planning application January 2, 2001

Lumber River Basin Located in the southern coastal and piedmont plains of North Carolina Includes 4 separate river drainage systems (Lumber and Waccamaw Rivers and tributaries, Little Pee Dee River Headwaters, and Coastal Area watershed) Comprised of portions of 10 counties and 53 municipalities

Scoping Phase for Lumber River Basin The Scoping Phase determines: What areas are floodprone and need flood hazard data developed Determine appropriate technical method for developing up-to-date flood hazard data and establish priority level How flood hazard data will be presented on FIRMs

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program State FEMA Kickoff Meeting with County/Local Floodplain Administrators Mapping Needs Assessment Effective FIS & FIRM Research Evaluate Post-Floyd Data NC Scoping Database Generate Initial Scoping Package Initial Scoping Meetings Develop Draft Basin Plans Final Scoping Meetings Finalize Basin Plans Process for Scoping Six River Basins in Eastern North Carolina Prepare Delivery Orders & CTC Mapping Activity Agreements & Update CTS Mapping Agreement Analysis and Mapping Step 1 Initial Research and Community Coordination Step 2 Initial Scoping Meeting Step 3 Draft Basin Plans Step 4 Final Scoping Meeting Step 5 Final Basin Plans SCOPING PRODUCTION Questionnaire North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program January 2, 2001

Step 4 — Final Scoping Meeting THIS IS WHERE WE ARE TODAY! All impacted counties and communities invited Two separate Final Scoping Meetings: January 4th - Bolivia, NC January 5th - Laurinburg, NC Draft Lumber River Basin plan presented Provides final opportunity for input

Step 5 — Final Basin Plan Draft Basin Plan may be revised following the Final Scoping Meeting Greenhorne & O’Mara, the State’s Floodplain Mapping Contractor for the Lumber River Basin, will develop proposals for the State Lumber River Basin Plan will be finalized and distributed to impacted counties and communities Production phase will then begin

North Carolina Lumber River Basin Meeting QUESTIONS ON THE SCOPING PHASE ? ? ?

Draft Lumber River Basin Plan Summarizes scoping phase Outlines how base maps and topography will be acquired Proposes engineering methods by which each flooding source reach will be studied Describes the process and schedule for completing the map production

Detailed Study — Riverine This method requires the following: DEMs Field surveys Channel bathymetry Bridge/culvert opening geometry Channel and floodplain characteristics Detailed Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses 10%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% annual chance flood elevations and boundaries identified (Zone AE) Floodways delineated

Riverine Areas to be Studied in Detail (cont’d)

Riverine Areas to be Studied in Detail (cont’d)

Riverine Areas to be Studied in Detail (cont’d)

Riverine Areas to be Studied in Detail

Detailed Study — Coastal This method produces the following: Floodplain mapping for areas along open coast and embayments Designations as Zones AE or VE

Redelineation This method requires the following: DEMs Effective FIS flood elevations Proposed for all areas currently shown on effective FIRM as Zone AE or VE and not being restudied

Approximate Study This method requires the following: DEMs Delineation of 1% annual chance floodplain boundaries using approximate methods Does not include collection/use of field-collected topographic data or bridge/culvert data Proposed for all areas currently shown on effective FIRM as Zone A and not being restudied in detail.

Use of Effective Information This method involves no new analyses or floodplain mapping Effective FIS and FIRM data is digitized and fitted to updated base map This method is not anticipated to be used for any communities in the Lumber River Basin

Schedule for FIRM Production

Community Review and Due Process Preliminary FIRMs provided when Lumber River Basin Study is complete 90-day appeal period Preliminary Countywide FIRMs provided when adjacent basin studies are complete All appeals evaluated and resolved Final Effective FIRMs provided and made available by the State on its Information Management System

North Carolina Lumber River Basin Meeting QUESTIONS ON THE DRAFT BASIN PLAN ? ? ?