ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Advertisements

Localization with RSSI Method at Wireless Sensor Networks Osman Ceylan Electronics Engineering PhD Student, Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye
Wireless Data Acquisition and Control How Antennas Work Copyright © 2008 Wilkerson Instrument Co., Inc All rights reserved 3 Element Yagi Yagi Horizontal.
Proposal on the Payload factor for N1 vehicles jointly submitted by European Commission, Germany, Japan, Korea and the Netherlands and supported by Transport.
W5HN North Texas Microwave Society NTMS 1 W5HN North Texas Microwave Society NTMS Intro to Microwave Propagation for data Joe Jurecka – N5PYK.
AUTOMOTIVE RADAR APPLICATIONS
Wireless Computer Networking Melanie Hanson May 6, 2002.
Multipath fading and reflections The signal takes many paths to the destination. The propagation delay along each path is different. How many meters difference.
Tutorial I: Radar Introduction and basic concepts
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0586r0 May 2014 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 Automotive Considerations for the Simulation Scenarios Date: 12-May-2014.
RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.
Combined Human, Antenna Orientation in Elevation Direction and Ground Effect on RSSI in Wireless Sensor Networks Syed Hassan Ahmed, Safdar H. Bouk, Nadeem.
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Jan 2013 Bo Sun, ZTE/CWPANSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Proposal of Channelization for aj.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
WRC–12 Industry Debrief 23 April 2012 Agenda item 8.2 – Future WRC Agendas.
Small-Scale Fading Prof. Michael Tsai 2016/04/15.
RADAR GUNS SHARANG GHARAGAONKAR. S.Y.ME-A.. WHAT IS RADAR GUN? RADAR means Radio Detection And Ranging Radar gun is a gun used to measure speed of anything.
DESIGN PARAMETRES AT BASE STATION Prittu Ann Thomas Roll no :14.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November, 2003 CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Promoting Spectrum Access for Wireless Microphone Operations.
Enterprise and Industry Directorate General European Commission An Introduction to the New Vehicle Safety Regulation Automotive Industry Unit Enterprise.
Fifth SADC Preparatory Meeting for the WRC-15 AGENDA 1.18 To consider a primary allocation to the radiolocation service for automotive applications in.
Refraction Light moving from one medium to another will bend towards or away from the normal, depending on the speed of light in the second medium.
Results of the CP-Meeting
Thomas Weilacher WG FM Chairman
Operation of Radar Services in 76 – 81 GHz band
Hala Esawi Hana Masri Shorouq Abu Assab Supervised by: Dr.Yousef Dama
Dr Mohaned Juwad Senior Manager – Spectrum Strategy Intelsat
Aircraft 60 GHz BRAN April 2016 Prepared by Steven H. Rines,
Presentation of ACSF C tests
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Global Availability of 5GHz Spectrum for Automotive Use
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May GHz Sharing Study David Baddeley, Motorola SPS.
Frequency Regulation – Global Update for Automotive Radars
In-band interference effects on UWB
February 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY considerations for low power body.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary Proposal for FHSS PHY for k]
China MM-Wave (CMMW) Study Group - Introduction of CMMW PAR and 5C
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
Total Internal Reflection
July 2010 doc.: IEEE xxx May 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
doc.: IEEE <doc#>check
January 19 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: European Regularity Considerations.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>check
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
May Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Supplement of Commonality Enhancement for.
ETSI update on Radio Frequency Identification
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for Wireless BAN Frequency Band Allocation]
Submission Title: [PHY/MAC enhancements for Secure Ranging Devices]
Total Internal Reflection
February 19 May 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: GFSK PHY proposal for Smart Utility.
Submission Title: European UWB Regulations Date Submitted: 14 May 2003
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Intended IG Objectives] Date Submitted:
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY considerations for low power body area.
Submission Title: [PHY/MAC enhancements for Secure Ranging Devices]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Status report from ITU-R WP 5A on ITS activities
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2016
New TGSRR Standard for receiver tests Document for discussions
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Regulatory Update in Europe for Gigabit Application.
May 19 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: European Regularity Considerations.
ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances
Report of 6 Months of IARU CISPR activity
GSC position on key WRC-19 AI 1.5 ESIMs
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Status of discussion after 8th meeting
Presentation transcript:

ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range Submitted by the experts of OICA Informal Document: ACSF-12-07 ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range

ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range Radar Cross-Section as key element for detection/evaluation Radar Cross-Section (RCS) is an indication of object detectability by RADAR. => the larger the RCS of an object is, the easier it can be detected Factors that affect the RCS/radar detectability: Size – the larger an object, the stronger its radar reflection Material – Most metals are strongly radar reflective and tend to produce strong signals. Wood, cloth, plastic, fiberglass and human/animal body parts are less reflective. Shape and orientation – Any ray incident along the normal will reflect back along the normal axis. Rounded surfaces often have some portion of the surface normal to the Radar source and thus result in reflections relatively independent of orientation. Surfaces smoothness – The relief of a surface could contain indentations that act as corner reflectors (which would increase RCS from many orientations). This could arise from engine or cooler intakes, joints clearance etc. 3

ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range Radar detectability of different object types Typical Radar Cross Section values: Passenger car: ~ 10 dBm² Motorcycle: ~ 5 dBm² Non-linear correlation of RCS and detection distance Due to high variance of motorcycles and influence of motorcycle rider, the detection distance for motorcycles varies 3

ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range Influences on radar performance The performance of a radar sensor is compromised by multiple factors, due to its technology, which cannot be omitted or influenced Deterioration and tolerances of the sensor : up to 4,5 dB Environmental conditions (rain, snowfall, dirt, etc.): up to 5,0 dB (-> threshold) Example: A loss of 20dB leads to range reduction of 70% dB 4

Worldwide available frequency bands Power limitation Harmonized EU standard Transmit power Range (no bumper) Status International recommendation 24 GHz ISM ETSI EN 302 858 EU: 20 dBm Japan: 27 dBm US: 12.7 dBm China: 13 dBm 60 -100 m Globally available ISM band (Industry, Scientific, Medical), but no specific automotive band (no protection against interference & too narrow band) 76-77 GHz EN 301 091 EU,US, China: 50 dBm 150 m Worldwide coverage Recommended for vehicle usage Front ITU-R M.1452-2 Category 1 77-81 GHz EN 302 264 EU: -9 dBm /MHz JPN: 45 dBm US: 50 dBm exp. (*) 30 - 100 m max. Status 2017 EU, RUS, JPN Expected for 2018 US, China, Korea Recommended for vehicle usage Side/Rear ITU-R M.1452-2 Category 2 (*) FCC: NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND RECONSIDERATION ORDER Adopted: February 3, 2015 Released: February, https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-16A1.pdf 5