How Updated CCSDS Protocols can Simplify Data Formatting for the Constellation Project Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Updated CCSDS Protocols can Simplify Data Formatting for the Constellation Project Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz.
Advertisements

Introduction to IPv6 Presented by: Minal Mishra. Agenda IP Network Addressing IP Network Addressing Classful IP addressing Classful IP addressing Techniques.
Computer Networks20-1 Chapter 20. Network Layer: Internet Protocol 20.1 Internetworking 20.2 IPv IPv6.
SDLS impact on TM, AOS, TC Space Data Link Protocols Greg Kazz NASA/JPL Oct 16/17, 2012.
A General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/
USLP Interface and Processing between Coding & Sync Sub-layer and Data Link Protocol Sub-layer.
IP Security. Overview In 1994, Internet Architecture Board (IAB) issued a report titled “Security in the Internet Architecture”. This report identified.
Internet Networking Spring 2003
Unified Frame Format Next Generation Data SpaceLink Protocol (NGSLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 2/20/
TCP : Transmission Control Protocol Computer Network System Sirak Kaewjamnong.
CCSDS Unified Space Data Link (USLP)
Internetworking Internet: A network among networks, or a network of networks Allows accommodation of multiple network technologies Universal Service Routers.
March 7, 2008Security Proposal 1 CCSDS Link Security Proposal Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz Howard Weiss March 7, 2008.
IPsec Introduction 18.2 Security associations 18.3 Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) 18.4 Internet Key Exchange.
FSH/security SLS-SLP fall2009 (version 4) Page 1 Security Headers + Homogeneous approach to FSH and Insert Zone in TM/AOS/TC frames: some problems and.
Proposal for a TC-2 Protocol Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz Oct /27/20151.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 5: IP, IP Routing, and ICMP (ch. 7, ch. 8, ch. 9, ch. 10) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
GBT SCA overview Slide 1-5 Work status Slide 6-10 Shuaib Ahmad Khan.
Seeking a General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 5/1/2012 5/1/12 Proposed Universal.
Impulse Radio April 8, 2004 ISDWG April 8, 2004 Data Service Multiplex.
Proposal for a Proximity-2 Protocol Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz May /11/20161.
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) Figure 4-14: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) MAP Packet Service.
Packet Service Packet Extraction VC Access Service VC_FSH Service VC Frame Service MC_Insert Service MC Frame Service MC_OCF Service Virtual Channel Reception.
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014 CCSDS Fall London Question: Why the change of name from NGSLP to USLP? Answer: 1) In time the.
CCSDS Telecommand Sync and Channel Coding Specification using advanced Block Codes Ed Greenberg NASA/JPL Oct. 15,
PRESENTATION ON SECURE SOCKET LAYER (SSL) BY: ARZOO THAKUR M.E. C.S.E (REGULAR) BATCH
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014
The Transport Layer Implementation Services Functions Protocols
Packet Switching Networks & Frame Relay
CS408/533 Computer Networks Text: William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, 6th edition Chapter 1 - Introduction.
Bruno Saba DCT/TV/IN 26/04/2010
Transfer Frame Structures
Next Generation: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) RFC 2460
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End)
Unified Frame Format Next Generation Data SpaceLink Protocol (NGSLP)
SLS-CS_13-03 Separating Coding from Framing
Seeking a General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 5/1/2012 5/1/12 Proposed Universal.
Bundle Protocol Specification
Next Generation Space Link Protocol – Raison d’etre
Understand the OSI Model Part 2
CCSDS Link Security Proposal
Switching Techniques In large networks there might be multiple paths linking sender and receiver. Information may be switched as it travels through various.
Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/2012
Lec 5 Layers Computer Networks Al-Mustansiryah University
Net 323: NETWORK Protocols
Flash EEPROM Emulation Concepts
Internet Protocol Version4
Guide to TCP/IP Fourth Edition
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
Switching Techniques In large networks there might be multiple paths linking sender and receiver. Information may be switched as it travels through various.
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol
Process-to-Process Delivery:
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTRGV, EDINBURG, TX
Secure WUR frames Date: Authors: January 2018
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Net 323 D: Networks Protocols
Chapter 7 Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4)
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Ch 17 - Binding Protocol Addresses
An Introduction to CDMA Air Interface: IS-95A
Process-to-Process Delivery: UDP, TCP
NET 323D: Networks Protocols
Transport Layer 9/22/2019.
Presentation transcript:

How Updated CCSDS Protocols can Simplify Data Formatting for the Constellation Project Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz

Organization of this Presentation What’s New in proposed CCSDS Link Layer Protocols Brief overview of new capabilities Why Constellation should consider utilizing the newly proposed AOS protocol services Simplicities achievable by using the new services How these newly proposed protocols can be implemented within Constellation to unify and simplify the production of all Telemetry and Command services between Mission Systems and Orion, et al. Detail description of how all the data formats can be accommodated by a single implementation approach

What’s New in proposed Link Layer Protocols Link Layer Security Methodology Provides Authenticated Encryption service Added and removed by the User Transparent to the supporting link layer services Secondary Header Data Service Provides a new pathway to support delay intolerant data Dynamic Service to elastically support the various instantaneous need i.e. range safety and operational voice

Link Layer Security Methodology Security Block Description An integrated data block that is inserted into the AOS frame containing the fields necessary to identify and accommodate the Authentication and/or the Encryption of the frame’s data contents Can be structured to provide identical security for all Virtual Channels (VC) or individually for each VC Contains the following Fields: A Security Protocol Identifier (SPI-identifies the current key and parameter usage) An optional counter field (for use in the AES_GCM security process) The ICV to hold the created Authentication Tag Optional Initialization and Pad fields (not used in AES_GCM process)

Secondary Header Data Service An optional data block whose inclusion in the frame is announced by a flag in the AOS primary header The use of the Secondary Header Data Service is applied on an individual VC basis The data block is self delimited (includes a length field) and self identifying (includes a type/identification field) The data block will only appear within the frame when its service is required The size of the data block can elastically adjust to the instantaneous need of the VC

AOS Services and Frame Organization Insert Zone Security Header Secondary Header Data Unit ASM Primary MPDU Header SPI-CTR-ICV Header-Type-Data Header- Packets 4-Bytes 6-Bytes (1+X+8 - Bytes) [2+(Y) – Bytes] (2+Z - Bytes) Primary Header Master Channel ID, VC ID, VC Counter, Secondary Header Flag Insert Zone (Security Data Unit) Managed field that is present in all VC on a Master Channel SPI (Key ID #), Counter LSBs (1 Fwd/3 Rtn), ICV Secondary Header Data Unit (carries delay intolerant data) Unique to a VC and is announced by a flag and delimited by length Header, Multiple self-identified data sets (header, size, data) MPDU Encapsulation Packets (all CCSDS packet types allowed)

Why Constellation should consider utilizing the proposed AOS protocol services The newly proposed AOS service provides capabilities that Constellation requires (i.e. link layer security) These services offer a capability that can unify and simplify the implementation of all AOS frames for both Telemetry and Command Offers a single method for including operation voice in all operational modes with minimum overhead also provides an automated way for correlating dissimilar voice when delivered via different physical paths A single AOS Frame Construction technique is utilized

Encapsulation Packets Encapsulation Packets Operational, Dissimilar and Emergency AOS Frame Formats all use the same Process Primary Header Insert Zone Secondary Header Secondary Header-Data MPDU Header MPDU Data Field CMD Security Header 10 bytes Range Safety Commands Voice Encapsulation Packets Variable 6 bytes 2 bytes Optional & Variable 2 bytes Primary Header Insert Zone Secondary Header Secondary Header-Data MPDU Header MPDU Data Field TLM Security Header 8 bytes Range Safety TLM DEM Voice Encapsulation Packets Variable 6 bytes 2 bytes Optional & Variable 2 bytes Security Header for CMD has 1 byte SPI, 1 byte Counter Field and 8 byte ICV Security Header for TLM is 1 byte SPI, 4 byte Counter Field and 4+ byte ICV Secondary Header Service- supports Range Safety and Ops Voice Header is 2 bytes: version, Header Type/Contents ID, length of header +data (10 bits) Range Safety: contains pre-specified DEM/Command Pre-defined size and included only when necessary Voice data is aggregated from a variable # of 10 byte voice blocks 1/2 chip may be required for 10.24 kbps rate 1k frame @ 24 kbps number of voice blocks per frame varies between 4 and 5 (40 or 50 bytes) This data is only included when necessary MPDU is standard CCSDS data field carrying CCSDS Packet types

AOS Frame Construction Framing Time Line Release Frame Request SHDU Request MPDU Release Frame Request SHDU Request MPDU Release Frame Request SHDU Request MPDU Release Frame Request SHDU Request MPDU Release Frame AOS Framing Process (time driven) Frames are constructed on a periodic basis If no data is available no frame is created, an idle frame will be supplied by the Link Transmission Process The initial frame construction reserves space where the Primary Header will be placed later A few ms before the rate defined Frame Release instant a request is issued to the Secondary Header Data Unit (SHDU) Constructor requesting a Secondary Header Data Unit A few ms later the SHDU, if one is available, is received and placed into the Frame Then a request is issued to the MPU Constructor (containing the size of the MPDU required) A Primary Header is constructed and set in place (If a SHDU was received the SH Flag Bit is set) The MPDU Constructor returns an MPDU of the requested size that is then added to the frame Secondary Header Data Unit Constructor (Range Safety-Voice) When a request is received it builds the SHDU with the data it had received and passes it to the Framing Process MPDU Constructor Buffers packets received via the designated port Once receiving the allowable MPDU length in the data request the MPDU is built and transferred to the Framing Process

Example Approach for Security The security could be provided by a single crypto unit for every frame transmitted on a link. The Security Block would be placed in the AOS Frame Insert Zone AES-GCM shall be used for command An eight byte counter would be used but only a portion need be sent For Command only a single byte need be transmitted within the Block For Telemetry only four bytes need be transmitted within the Block The SDI will increment when the counter overflows providing automated key changes The minimum of eight bytes of ICV is required for authentication Its usage need for telemetry is questionable Counter for Command could be up to 8 bytes in length

Secondary Header Data Unit Construction Launch/Range Safety Data A defined DEM is created by the launch vehicle and forwarded for inclusion in the Secondary Header Data Unit. Voice Receives and buffers 10 byte Voice Chips from the voice codec Builds a Voice Group containing a Label and the received Voice Chips Label contains a Master Chip Counter and a count of the number of chips included in this SHDU Master Chip Counter is a sequential count chips transmitted prior to this frame (modulo 4096) No Voice Group is created if less than 2 chips are available Secondary Header Data Unit The SHDU Header contains the SH version ID, the Type ID and Length of the SHDU Example Type ID 1) Voice only with label 2)- Voice with label and fixed Range Safety 3) Selective Engineering DEMs with header If an SHDU is created it is passed to Frame Constructor Label Voice Chips Note: SHDU can include fill to eliminate the inclusion of an MPDU SHDU Fill Chip Counter # of Chips 12 bits 4 bits Variable (20-125 bytes) Secondary Header Range Safety DEM Label Voice Chips Optional Version Type ID Length M Counter # of Chips 10 bytes/Chip 2 bits 3 bits 11 bits Fixed if present Optional Optional

CxP Rates LDPC Uncoded 10 or 10.5 CC-RS LDPC 5 or 6 4 or 5 2 or 3 Voice Chips/frame Frame Size Uncoded CC-RS LDPC 10.6 10 or 10.5 5 or 6 4 or 5 2 or 3 0 or 2 LDPC 9.7 21.2 9.7 21.2 @ 10.24 ksps uncoded 4+6+10+2+2+100/105 =120/125 bytes use 1024 bits/frame w/ 103ms period @ 10.6 ksps uncoded 4+6+10+2+2+100+8=Sync+128 byte frame w/ 100ms period Note the follow is in symbols (rate ½), ASM=8, PH=12, Security=20*, SH=4, Voice Label=4 * Security for Command is 10 bytes and for Telemetry can be 9 bytes @ 20.48 ksps CC-RS 8 +12+20+4+4+200/210+ ???? Doesn’t work- Frame size is limited to 192 bytes @ 20.48 ksps LDPC 8 +12+20+4+4+200/210 + 16/6=2048 symbols w/ 103 ms period @ 21.2 ksps CC only 8 +12+20+4+4+200+8+8 (CRC) =2048 symbols w/ 100 ms period @ 21.2 ksps LDPC 8 +12+20+4+4+200+16 =2048 symbols with a 100 ms period @ 36 ksps LDPC 8+12+20+4+4+100/120+4+112/92 =2048 symbols = 58.7 ms/frame @ 72 ksps LDPC 8+12+20+4+4+40/60+4+172/152 = 2048 symbols = 29.3 ms/frame @ 144 ksps LDPC 8+12+20+-----+0/48+4+220/172 = 2048 symbols = 14.66 ms/frame @ 384 ksps LDPC 8+12+20+-----+0/40+4+220/172 = 2048 symbols = 7.33 ms/frame @ Higher rates do not need to contain a Secondary Header Data Unit to satisfy latency issues Blue is proposed replacement

Secondary Header Service Version Type Length Data Variable up to a maximum of 2046 bytes 2 bits 3 bits 11 bits This service is dynamic, self identifying & self delimiting Type field identify contents Up to 8 content definitions can be identified i.e. Voice only, Voice and Range Safety DEM, other Data field can fill frame eliminating a MPDU when desired For Launch: Range Safety and Operational Voice delivery For Dissimilar service: Voice and/or Engineering data Data field can be empty allowing the MPDU to fill frame

Voice Backup ?? This is my assumption—Please advise on its correctness The Codec creates a 10 byte chip for 10 ms of voice The Codec is connected to the operation’s voice net The Codec data chip is sent via ??? Let’s say via IP to the designated Port(s) within an address Port A is Secondary Constructor Port B is ENCAP Constructor (could include header compression or not) Port C is the Dissimilar Link constructor If a counter is incremented for each chip and sent with the chip then that counter could be included in the secondary and the Dissimilar voice frames allowing the receiving system to synchronize the chips eliminating manual syncing and reducing the offset to near nothing.