3-1 Assessment Kevin Kyle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 4 Law and order Word power. Words related to law 1. a dishonest, violent, or immoral action that can be punished by law. Last night a woman was.
Advertisements

Student Sample: Science
JODI ARIAS BY: SARAH JONES.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON A MERICAN GOVERNMENT HOLT 1 The U.S. Legal System Section 1: U.S. Law Section 2: The Criminal Justice System Section 3: Corrections.
Explains with some clear reasoning and relevance CPS requirements for charging suspects.
Do you know your civil rights?
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Data Protection Act 1998 section 56: Enforced Subject Access – What you need to know.
Section 10.2.
Courtroom Terms / Justice System
Pre-Trial Procedures. Release before trial  Few people charged with a crime are held in jail until their trial  There must be good reason to keep someone.
DNA, crime and law enforcement Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School - Wu Laboratory
What are the legal requirements for a confession or admission to be admissible in Georgia? What would constitute a ‘hope of benefit’?
Categories of law Civil-private wrong Criminal-public wrong.
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
Common Writing Assessment #1. 1. Number the steps of the prompt (in order). 2. Write a TAGS statement. **Use your verbs list** T- A- G- S- 1._______________________________________________________.
TECHNICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT #1. 1. Number the steps of the prompt (in order). 2. Write a TAGS statement. T- A- G- S- **Use your verbs list** **REFER.
Chapter 16.2 Criminal Cases.
Chapter 13 Answers to Worksheet. 1 Charges are dropped or there is a guilty plea by the criminal or lawyer representing.
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Moses Sithole ( The Gauteng Killer) “I CAN’T REMEMBER HER NAME, I KILLED HER AND LEFT HER THERE. I WENT STRAIGHT HOME AND HAD A SHOWER.”
DNA, crime and law enforcement Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
BY JIMI L ♥ VELAND The Criminal Justice Process. Crime is reported – investigated by police. If there is enough evidence, police give the case to the.
DNA, crime and law enforcement Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School
EXTERNALITIES. Externality When one person’s actions imposes a cost or benefit on the well-being of a bystander. Externalities usually result in market.
In the town of Vladimir in Russia there lived a wealthy young merchant named Ivan Aksenoff. He owned two shops and a large house.
Reading and Writing
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES. WHAT EXACTLY ARE CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES?  Processes and procedures that occur before a trial or hearing commences.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial Chapter 13.
Bell Ringer Criminal Law: Stages of a Criminal Case  Criminal prosecution develops in a series of stages.  Try to place the following stages in the correct.
Criminal Law Basics.
The lost art of forgiveness
Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
THE DAILY NEWS DON’T ASK
Necessity defence of self defence
Unit 4 Word power.
Miranda Rights.
Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F
Arrest power and interrogation techniques
Part of the 4th Amendment
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Unit 7: The American Legal System
Constitutional Rights Before a trial
CRIMINAL PROCEDUREESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #6 MODEL ANSWER
Presented by: Simonia Mashangoane & Carolyn Raphaely
Moral Reasoning.
Bushrangers.
Path to Prison Gallery Walk (APIATS)
Lesson 5-2 Criminal Procedure.
The Criminal Process Cases & Examples.
Charge Negotiation Where the prosecutor AGREES to REMOVE some charges
The Federal Court System & the Judicial Branch
Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell
A LESSON IN CHOICE AND MORAL DILEMMAS.
Serial Mini Project Ms. Peterson.
Chapter 15 Section 2 Chapter 16 Sections 1 and 2
Sentencing & Release Lesson 66 CLU 3MR.
Accountability in the Court of Law
Trial Procedures Agenda 6… Unit test first week back in April
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Locked up.. Won’t let me out….
Sungshin Women’s University
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
RIGHTS GIVEN TO THE PEOPLE
Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief”
Presentation transcript:

3-1 Assessment Kevin Kyle

Your boss at Swift Electronics is getting ready to enter into a series of contracts with a new group of suppliers. She is concerned with avoiding the delays and high costs of and litigation that might result from the new agreements. She asks you for your recommendations. You suggest putting a binding arbitration clause in the contracts. Problem 1

The relatively low cost and swiftness of the arbitration process plus the potential for court enforcement of the result cause it to be a wise recommendation. Answer 1

Don long is convicted of second degree murder fir killing a woman he had been seeing for the past few months. The court sentenced him to 30 years in jail. One year after the trial, Don admits that he withheld evidence that would've cleared him. He states he did so to protect his twin brother, who actually committed the crime, but who was dying of cancer at the time. He further states he didn’t want his brother spending his last years behind bars. His brother since died. The evidence is conclusive as to dons innocence. Should the court set aside his conviction due to the new evidence? What polices would support the court in not doing so. Question 2

The court may or may not set aside the conviction The court may or may not set aside the conviction. Although the withholding of evidence was for a good cause, it also wasted the courts time and resulted in the expenditure of resources that could have been better applied to other cases. Courts in the past have refused to act as long requests. Courts are especially suspicious of confession by other prisoners to the same crime. Courts also do not like to change the results inn completed trials when the “new” evidence could have been developed and presented at the original trial. Answer 2