Optimizing high-resolution troposphere estimates using PPP method and Benchmark data set Václavovic P., Douša J. Geodetic Observatory Pecný, RIGTC, Czech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EM Algorithm Jur van den Berg.
Advertisements

Adaptive Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filter and It’s Evaluation for Tracking in Surveillance Xinyu Xu and Baoxin Li, Senior Member, IEEE.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo swisstopo Report for EGVAP 2008/2009 E. Brockmann.
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
Kalman Smoothing Jur van den Berg.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 13 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
AN INDUSTRY APPROACH TO PRECISE POINT POSITIONING GNSS PPP WORKSHOP D. Calle A. Mozo P. Navarro R. Píriz D. Rodríguez G. Tobías JUNE 13 TH, GNSS.
E-GVAP: EUMETNET GPS Water Vapour Programme
1 Hybrid methods for solving large-scale parameter estimation problems Carlos A. Quintero 1 Miguel Argáez 1 Hector Klie 2 Leticia Velázquez 1 Mary Wheeler.
CZEPOS – a Multipurpose Positioning System for the Czech Republic Oldřich Pašek – Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre Jan Řezníček – Land.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
VRS Network The Magic Behind the Scene
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
GIE/EIG EUMETNET, Registered Number RPM Bruxelles International Collaboration in the field of GNSS-Meteorology and Climate Monitoring Jonathan.
Distributed Tracking Using Kalman Filtering Aaron Dyreson, Faculty Advisor: Ioannis Schizas, Ph.D. Department of Electrical Engineering, The University.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 4 June 2008 Recommendations from “RT/NRT user requirements” 1.E-GVAP recommends IGS to support PPP strategy with high quality.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
XXV FIG Congress Kuala Lumpur 2014 "Engaging the Challenges, Enhancing the Relevance" June 2014, Malaysia Study on the Quality of.
Stable Multi-Target Tracking in Real-Time Surveillance Video
Meeting the Needs of the IGS Real-Time PPP User Community
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Kalman Filtering And Smoothing
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere- free combination of code and phase observables.
Evolving RBF Networks via GP for Estimating Fitness Values using Surrogate Models Ahmed Kattan Edgar Galvan.
Facets: Fast Comprehensive Mining of Coevolving High-order Time Series Hanghang TongPing JiYongjie CaiWei FanQing He Joint Work by Presenter:Wei Fan.
Arizona State University1 Fast Mining of a Network of Coevolving Time Series Wei FanHanghang TongPing JiYongjie Cai.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami IGS Real Time Pilot Project: Analysis Centre Activities Loukis Agrotis 4 June 2008.
COST ES1206 (GNSS4SWEC) M.C. Meeting Reykjavik, Iceland NATIONAL REPORT OF BELGIUM, 2016 Eric Pottiaux, Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) Roeland van.
Recent GNSS activities in Germany for COST
J. Douša (1), G. Dick (2), M. Kačmařík (3), P. Václavovic (1), E
Jan Douša and Galina Dick COST GNSS4SWEC Workshop and MC Meeting
*CPC Morphing Technique
ES1206: Advanced GNSS tropospheric products for monitoring severe weather and climate (GNSS4SWEC) 3rd Action Workshop Reykjavik, Iceland, 8-10th March.
Recent GNSS activities in Germany for COST and E-GVAP
Benchmark Campaign of the COST Action GNSS4SWEC:
L-Dominance: An Approximate-Domination Mechanism
WG1: ASYM subgroup Overview of recent activities of the contributors and future plans: AUSTRIA (Gregor Möller, Robert Weber, TU Vienna) - Effect of the.
WG3: GNSS for climate monitoring
Ilke Deniz, Cetin Mekik, Gokhan Gurbuz
Rosa Pacione (e-geos, ASI/CGS, Italy)
Overview of GNSS & GNSS-Met situation in France
ASYM subWG1 – Feedback from the splinter meeting
Validation of slant delays acquired by different techniques within GNSS4SWEC Benchmark campaign Current status M. Kačmařík, J. Douša, G. Dick, F.
Jan Douša, Michal Eliaš, Pavel Václavovic
Space Geodesy Branch Highlights, August 2002 CONT02 VLBI Campaign
Status of EUMETSAT Study on Radio Occultation
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Real-Time Working Group
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
COST Action ES1206: Advanced GNSS tropospheric products for monitoring severe weather events and climate Jonathan Jones Met Office, UK Structure of Action.
GNSS-meteorology situation
Troposphere delay stochastic modelling in precise real-time GNSS applications Tomasz Hadaś1, Norman Teferle2, Wenwu Ding2, Kamil Kaźmierski1, Nicolas Hadjidemetriou2,
Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth
Jincong He, Louis Durlofsky, Pallav Sarma (Chevron ETC)
Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products
TEST OF GOCE EGG DATA FOR SPACECRAFT POSITIONING
GPS Network: Status GFZ
REF TEK Technology Overview
Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08 Kamil Teke (1,2), Johannes Böhm(1), Tobias Nilsson(1), Harald Schuh(1),
IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, September 2012
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 13
Neural networks (1) Traditional multi-layer perceptrons
Agenda Background and Motivation
Presentation transcript:

Optimizing high-resolution troposphere estimates using PPP method and Benchmark data set Václavovic P., Douša J. Geodetic Observatory Pecný, RIGTC, Czech Republic COST ES1206/GNSS4SWEC 3rd Workshop March 8-10, 2016, Reykjavik, Iceland 1

Outline Our new approach for NRT estimates using Kalman filter + backward smoother Using GLONASS in the Benchmark campaign

Principle of the forward-backward filter Filtering: Xk|k = E(X|y1,y2,y3, …, yk) Smoothing : Xk|N = E(X|y1,y2,y3, …, yk, …, yN) 1 k N y1, y2, y3, … yk y1, y2, y3, … yk, … yN Forward pass (Kalman, SRCF, SRIF) Backward pass

Principle of the forward-backward filter Flow chart of the algorithm

Principle of the forward-backward filter Smoothing always improves precision w.r.t. filtering Almost the same precision in all epochs Observations from whole period contribute to all estimates - similar to LSQ, however with support for high-resolution estimates

RT/NRT estimates Kalman filter + backward smoother Reference ZTDs: GOP’s Bernese (1h, network solution) and GFZ’s (15min, PPP) Simulated RT ZTDs (IGS03 from IGS RTS): GOP’s G-Nut/Tefnut software (30 s, PPP) NRT simulation (Kalman+smoother): different smoothing update: 15min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 24h

RT/NRT estimates Kalman filter + backward smoother

RT/NRT estimates Kalman filter + backward smoother The precision of high-resolution ZTDs has been improved by smoother with delays up to 6 hours (up to 35% - from 10 mm to 6,5 mm) Backward filter optimizes an estimate if any parameter changes very rapidly – it uses not only previous observations but also subsequent Based only on matrix operation => very fast (e.g. forward: 21 s; backward 2 s) If real-time estimates are not necessary delayed results can be provided with better precision Smoothed parameters over the whole period have been estimated with the same precision

Using GLONASS in the Benchmark campaign How to optimally set up GLO observation weighting Five solutions Sol 1: GPS only: σGPS Sol 2: GPS+GLO: σGLO = 2 σGPS Sol 3: GPS+GLO: σGLO = 3 σGPS Sol 4: GPS+GLO: σGLO = 4 σGPS Sol 5: GPS+GLO: σGLO = 5 σGPS RT: PPP, forward filter, 5min, IGS03 RTS PP: PPP, forward filter, 5min, ESA final Reference ZTDs: GOP’s Bernese (1h, network solution) First two hours of a day are not included in the evaluation => no convergence

Using GLONASS in the Benchmark campaign Sol 1 GPS Sol 2 GPS + GLO σGLO = 2 σGPS Sol 3 σGLO = 3 σGPS Sol 4 σGLO = 4 σGPS Sol 5 σGLO = 5 σGPS

Impact of GLONASS on tropo gradients GPS + GLO σGLO = 2 σGPS Products: ESA final

Impact of GLONASS on tropo gradients GPS + GLO σGLO = 3 σGPS Products: IGS03 RTS

Conclusion ‘Ultra-fast’ troposphere estimates should be balanced for the delay & accuracy targeting the application PPP with bi-directional filter are powerful approach for estimation large dense network in high-resolution PPP provides full exploiting of multi-GNSS data Our approach for NRT can be immediately applied in RT-Demo campaign - traditional hourly estimates with LSQ can be replaced by bi-directional filter with one hour delay GLONASS improved troposphere estimates only when final products were used => low quality of RT products. (The same analysis should be done in 2016 for application in RT-Demo)

Thank you for your attention Acknowledgements: IGS for data and products - RTS, MGEX, Final Benchmark GNSS data from EPOSA, SAPOS, ASG-EUPOS, CZEPOS, VESOG, GEONAS, Trimble The work has been supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Science (LD14102) Related publications: Václavovic P, Douša J (2015), Backward smoothing for precise GNSS applications, Advances in Space Research, Volume 56, Issue 8, 15 October 2015, Pages 1627-163 Douša J, Václavovic P (2014) Real-time zenith tropospheric delays in support of numerical weather prediction applications. Advances in Space Research (2014), Vol 53, No 9, pp 1347-1358 Douša J, Dick G, Kačmařík M, Brožková R, Zus F, Brenot H, Stoycheva A, Möller G, Kaplon J (2016), Benchmark campaign and case study episode in Central Europe for development and assessment of advanced GNSS tropospheric models and products, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., discussion paper, 2016 Ahmed F, Václavovic P, Teferle FN, Douša J, Bingley R, Laurichesse D (2015), Comparative analysis of real- time precise point poisitioning zenith total delay estimates, GPS solut, FirstOnline, pp. 1-13