Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) City of Missoula.
Advertisements

+ James Carras. + Carras Community Investment, Inc. Prepared Fair Housing and Equity Assessment for regional vision and plan – Seven/50 Prepared Regional.
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing University of MD School of Law Melody Taylor-Blancher, Regional Director – Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
Background Fair Housing Act Amendments(FHAA) of Prohibits Discrimination --Requires HUD to administer development programs (funds) in a manner that.
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING Memphis Fair Housing Center – Memphis Area Legal Services Sapna V. Raj, Managing Attorney (901)
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing What can I do? Dale Ellen Azaria General Counsel Department of Housing and Community Development.
Steed Robinson – Office of Community Development  September 4, 2014 Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
Not In My Back Yard FAIR HOUSING FOR ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS.
Surviving a FHEO Compliance Review and Complying with AFFH.
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Glenn Misner  September 4, 2014.
Fair Housing Continuum, Inc. AD Escander, Fair Housing Specialist.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Fair Housing/ Equal Opportunity and Section 3.
University of Maryland Law School April 12, 2013 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in HUD Housing Programs A First Term “Report Card” Philip Tegeler,
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Glenn Misner  September 10, 2015.
1 Public Input: 9/23/04Nebraska Consolidated Plan Support Nebraska This Research is in Support of Nebraska Consolidated Plan For Housing and Community.
April 12, 2013 University of Maryland School of Law The Fair Housing Act at 45: Actualizing the Duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing.
Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Steed Robinson, Office of Community Development  September 10, 2015.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
1 1 Non-Discrimination and Fair Housing Requirements For Grant Administrators.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
BEVERLY DAVIS, ASST. DIRECTOR, FAIR HOUSING AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHRIS PLUMMER, ASK DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE.
Housing & Urban Development Mixed-Income Housing.
 Introduction to the AFFH Rule 2   Provide for better fair housing planning and address issues raised with the Analysis of Impediments process  To.
AVOIDING DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT.
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Training for the National Community Development Association October 29 – November 1, 2013.
+ ECFRPC Sustainable Communities FHEA and Initial Sunrail Station Area Analysis James Carras Carras Community Investment Inc. September 20, 2013.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ANTONETTE SEWELL, Esq. Director of Legal Services  December 3, 2015.
The Small Cities’ CDBG Program and the Obligation to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing.
Massachusetts Association of Planning Directors Jennifer Raitt, Metropolitan Area Planning Council January 2016.
Presented to Illinois NAHRO August 13, 2015 Jennifer Novak Chan, Secretary, Illinois NAHRO.
 Introduction to the AFFH Rule 2   Provide for better fair housing planning  Promote better understanding by program participants of AFFH  Address.
Presented by Mollie Fitzpatrick, Heidi Aggeler, Jen Garner 1999 Broadway, Suite 2200 Denver, Colorado (303)
AVOIDING DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT.
COMMUNITY NEED MEETING HOUSING AND COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
Jo Carroll DeStefano Community Development & Training Network Public Works Department June-August 2011 City of Rowlett Public Works Department Proposed.
Portland Housing Bureau Budget Worksession Presentation Slide 1.
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING: ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING (AFH) KORI SCHNEIDER PERAGINE NCDA June 22, 2016.
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
Demystifying the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)
Site and Neighborhood Standards for RAD Conversions
Data and maps in the afh Presented to:
Laurel Hart, Director Housing Finance & Development
Catherine E. Ybarra, Esq Simone & Associates th Avenue
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT AND FAIR HOUSING PLENARY
understanding the link
Glossary AFFH Rule - 24 C.F.R. §§
Community Public Forum City of Los Angeles
Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)
Using Data to Assess Fair Housing
FRANKLIN COUNTY THRIVE.
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING (AFFH) Finding the Right Site
NCSHA 2016 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Robert Renner, Office of Policy Development and Research
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
HUD Region II Priorities
Naco – Housing platform
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Assessment of Fair Housing
Description of the Goal
AFFH: Next Steps for your community
Assessment of Fair Housing
Community Health Indicators
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
Current conditions.
Western Greater Yellowstone Area Analysis of Impediments to
The Consolidated Plan Nicole Engels City of Omaha Planning Housing and Community Development.
Washington County: The Challenge Ahead
Racial Disparities in Homelessness
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) City of Wilmington & Wilmington Housing Authority

What is an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH)? The AFH is required by HUD. The AFH includes: An analysis of fair housing data, An assessment of fair housing issues and contributing factors, and An identification of fair housing priorities and goals.

Why Conduct an AFH? Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) is a legal requirement that federal agencies and their grantees further the purposes of the Fair Housing Act.

Fair Housing Act The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other real estate-related transactions because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or disability. For the purposes of the AFFH rule, the duty to “affirmatively further fair housing” means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. 24 CFR § 5.152

Fair Housing Issues Segregation/Integration Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPS) Disparities in Access to Opportunities Disproportionate Housing Needs Housing Choice

Segregation Wilmington Population - 71% White & 19% Black Black Population as % of Pop down 6% 1990-2010 Same trends in region Hispanic Population increase 5% 1990-2010 Racial segregated residential patterns Two Racial/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPS) R/ECAP – Northside & Southside – 6,800 pop; R/ECAP - 77% Black; 45% families w/children Should follow this with a map…. For those visual folks… it quickly conveys the segregation and concentration…

Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty R/ECAP Concentrated poverty has been found to have a long-term effect on outcomes for children growing up in these neighborhoods related to a variety of indicators including crime, health and education and future employment and lifetime earnings

Opportunity Disparity Opportunity Disparity measured by Opportunity Index (Score) African Americans score lower than Whites on: Low Poverty (reside in low poverty areas) School Proficiency Labor Participation/Employment Housing Need Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (66%) experience housing problems at higher percentage than Whites (39%), including severe housing problems Blacks (31%) experience cost burden at 10 points more than Whites (20%); and Hispanics (24%) at 4 points more than Whites

Low Poverty

School Proficiency

Job Proximity

Labor Market Engagement/ Employment

Transportation Cost Index

Fair Housing Issues Publicly Supported Housing Disability and Access Fair Housing Enforcement Outreach Capacity Resources

(Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction Public Housing Table 5 - Publicly Supported Housing Units by Program Category   (Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction Housing Units # % Total housing units 54,462 - Public Housing 1,028 1.89 Project-based Section 8 1,034 1.90 Other Multifamily 165 0.30 HCV Program 1,616 2.97 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; APSH Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info).

Asian or Pacific Islander Public Housing Table 6 - Publicly Supported Housing Residents by Race/Ethnicity   Race/Ethnicity (Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction White Black Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Housing Type # % Public Housing 53 6.06 806 92.22 11 1.26 1 0.11 Project-Based Section 8 515 53.87 355 37.13 49 5.13 33 3.45 Other Multifamily 120 76.92 32 20.51 0.00 3 1.92 HCV Program 241 18.34 1,028 78.23 41 3.12 2 0.15 0-30% of AMI 4,465 56.16 2,739 34.45 405 5.09 25 0.31 0-50% of AMI 7,350 54.06 4,199 30.89 880 6.47 60 0.44 0-80% of AMI 13,120 59.99 6,069 27.75 1,360 6.22 100 0.46 77,998 71.26 21,056 19.24 6,592 6.02 1,355 1.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; APSH; CHAS Note 2: #s presented are numbers of households not individuals. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info).

(Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction (Wilmington, NC CBSA) Region Disability by Type Table 13 - Disability by Type   (Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction (Wilmington, NC CBSA) Region Disability Type # % Hearing difficulty 3,681 3.59 9,749 4.04 Vision difficulty 2,601 2.53 5,634 2.34 Cognitive difficulty 5,292 5.16 11,888 4.93 Ambulatory difficulty 7,696 7.50 18,899 7.83 Self-care difficulty 2,587 2.52 6,283 2.60 Independent living difficulty 4,814 4.69 11,399 4.73 Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources: ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info).

Severe Housing Cost Burden Table 10 - Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden   Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden* (Wilmington, NC CDBG, HOME) Jurisdiction (Wilmington, NC CBSA) Region Race/Ethnicity # with severe cost burden # households % with severe cost burden White, Non-Hispanic 6,875 34,835 19.74 13,160 84,430 15.59 Black, Non-Hispanic 2,620 8,364 31.32 3,870 14,709 26.31 Hispanic 450 1,855 24.26 760 3,783 20.09 Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 90 355 25.35 115 850 13.53 Native American, Non-Hispanic 40 100 40.00 290 13.79 Other, Non-Hispanic 245 725 33.79 395 1,365 28.94 Total 10,320 46,225 22.33 18,340 105,405 17.40 Household Type and Size Family households, <5 people 3,480 22,370 15.56 7,230 58,960 12.26 Family households, 5+ people 375 1,675 22.39 855 5,480 15.60 Non-family households 6,485 22,190 29.22 10,250 40,960 25.02 Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info).

Housing Cost Burden

Choice Fair housing choice involves individuals and families having the information, opportunity, and options to live where they choose without unlawful discrimination and other barriers related to race, color, religion, sex familial status, national origin, or disability, and that their choices realistically include housing options in integrated area and areas with access to opportunity

Fair Housing Goals Goals must be measureable, tracked, and directly related to overcoming the significant contributing factors identified The goals will be incorporated into subsequent planning processes and documents HUD advises a “Balanced Approach” HUD has advised a balanced approach….

Fair Housing Goals (cont.) Goal 1: Increase Affordable Housing Options Goal 2: Maintain Existing Affordable Housing Goal 3: Increase Local Housing Enforcement Efforts Goal 4: Reduce Housing Discrimination Based on Disabilities Goal 5: Expand & Improve Access to Funding Sources for Affordable Housing Development Give examples throughout this part of the presentation

Fair Housing Goals (cont.) Goal 6: Increase Homeownership Opportunities Goal 7: Improve Educational Supportive Services Goal 8: Improve Access to Employment Training Opportunities Goal 9: Improve Access to Employment Opportunities Goal 10: Improve Access to Public Transportation Give examples, recall the issue with occupancy code no more than 3 unrelated persons per residence…. Erich to provide examples during presentation – mixed use planning/development, accessory dwelling units, minimum lot and building sizes, set back requirements, etc. etc. Density bonuses, impact and permit fee waivers etc.

Fair Housing Goals (cont.) Goal 11: Improve Public Perception of Affordable Housing Goal 12: Improve Land Use & Planning Efforts

Next Steps Implementation in Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans Collaborative Effort amongst City departments & w/ stake holders