MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QXF Quench Protection: issues and plans Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab QXF Video-meeting August 1, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High.
Advertisements

Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Results & Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
HQ02b Meeting 4/24/14High Miits Study – G. Sabbi 1 High MIITs Study GianLuca Sabbi Video meeting on HQ02b test results – April 24, 2014.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Impact of Cu/NonCu on Quench Protection 1 Impact of Cu/NonCu on MQXF Quench Protection G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, E. Todesco Conductor Video Mtg. April.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
Design Features: still to be determined and open questions P. Ferracin 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014 KEK, Tsukuba.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
MQXF Quench Protection G. Ambrosio on behalf of the MQXF team With special contribution by: S. Izquierdo Bermudez, V. Marinozzi, E. Ravaioli, T. Salmi,
QXF instrumentation trace development
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Dan Cheng Mar 6, 2014 QXF Instrumentation Trace Fabrication Update.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Progress Report on LQ Program Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Summary of LARP Magnets 1 Summary of LARP magnets (incomplete & to be checked) G. Ambrosio Conductor Video Mtg. April 20, 2015.
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
D. Cheng Feb 11, 2014 QXF Instrumentation Trace Update.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
1 Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 QXF heater design M. Marchevsky, D.W. Cheng (LBNL) E. Todesco (CERN) T. Salmi (Tampere UT) G. Chalchidze, G.
Long Quadrupole – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting – FNAL, Oct , 2008 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio LARP Collaboration.
WAMSDO, January 16, CERNModels and experimental results – G. Ambrosio 11 Models and experimental results from LQ, HQ (… and more) and QXF Giorgio.
E. Todesco OUTPUT OF THE CABLE REVIEW E. Todesco and the QXF team CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 10 th December 2014 QXF design review, CERN.
E. Todesco PROTECTION FOR QXF E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland QXF protection meeting 28 th October 2013.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)
Next Steps in Magnet R&D Steve Gourlay LBNL EuCARD Workshop on a High Energy LHC Malta October 14, 2010.
Quench Protection Maximum Voltages G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi WG Video-Mtg January 14, 2015.
QXF protection meeting, 4/29/14HQ High Miits Study – H. Bajas, G. Sabbi 1 HQ02 High MIITs Studies Preliminary findings and next steps Hugo Bajas, GianLuca.
MQXF protection: work in progress and plans Vittorio Marinozzi 9/23/ QLASA calibration with HQ02 data.
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
Heaters for the QXF magnets: designs and testing and QC M. Marchevsky (LBNL)
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LQM01 Test Summary Guram Chlachidze LARP CM16 Montauk, NY May 16-18, 2011.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
MQXFPM1 and MQXFS1b Test Results
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
HQ Coil 19 Test Impregnation
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
MQXF Short Models Status and Plans
Protection Database Tool
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
MQXF coil cross-section status
Detection thresholds in LARP Magnets
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Electrical Quality Control (QC): coil to coil parts
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland
Long term behavior and high MIITs test in the LARP program
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Hi-pot results summary
Presentation transcript:

MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals Topical meeting on QXF quench protection MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals G. Ambrosio April 29, 2014

Outline Status at MT23 (First complete analysis) Progress Goals for this meeting

Status at MT23 Simulations performed with QLASA and ROXIE using MATPRO material property database Using preliminary MQXF requirements Assuming heaters only on the outer layer With conservative assumptions: Layer-layer propagation No bronze in strands No dynamic effects Hot spot temp. ~ 350 K Without margin nor redundancy Close to epoxy glass transition temperature ~max acceptable temp. if there is no earlier detraining

“Bubbles” Issue “Bubbles” on coils inner surface Coil-insulation separation Heater-coil separation Seen in TQ, LQ, HQ coils only non inner layer TQ coils showed small “bubbles” (no heaters on IL) HQ coils showed small “bubbles” and cracks along heaters LQ coils had long “bubbles” LQ coil HQ coil

Progress so far Demonstrated that bronze (30% in RRP) reduces the effective strand resistance  Hot spot temperature lower by ~ 30K  Should be taken into account in all simulations Compared property databases MATPRO is most conservative Use MATPRO until we do a controlled experiment Compared HQ02a test data with simulations (using MT23 assumptions) Next slides Performed QP tests on HQ02b Next talks

Simulations vs. HQ02a Measurements Under the assumptions used for MQXF, the heaters-induced quench simulations are conservative. At the current of interest (0.8 of SSL), the MIITs are overestimated by 13-16 % (65-80 K) Margin is due to: dI/dt effects conservative assumptions in modeling of heaters and propagation OL to IL Most significant case for MQXF Current/SSL 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 MIITs difference % (no dump case) 14.5 13.2 9.6 10.7 MIITs difference % (3 mΩ dump case) 13.4 11.1 6.4 5.3 MIITs difference % (5 mΩ dump case) 16.5 13.3 4.8 2.4

Work in Progress The improvements presented may not be sufficient to provide redundancy and margin Further improvements: Development of heaters for Inner Layer w/o bubbles Optimization of heater design and materials Exploring the use of CLIQ Testing max acceptable temperature (HQ02b) Longer magnets with lower gradient are the back up solution (with several drawbacks)

GOALS for this meeting Assess status of MQXF protection after most recent HQ test results and with latest heater designs Plan next steps Abandon option of longer magnets?

Guidelines for QP analyses It is very important to use the same criteria when doing HQ analyses and QXF simulations Ex: HQ data  T max  HQ simulations Adiabatic approximation Unreacted strand & cable dimensions Actual/nominal Cu%, RRR, Jc, … (HQ/QXF) Actual/nominal cable insulation thickness (HQ/QXF) Half interlayer insulation included in each layer for enthalpy computation (?) Include bronze (30% for RRP) among strand materials Use MATPRO material properties

Back up Slides

Coils after Test Some “bubbles” on coils inner layer Possible causes: Coil-insulation separation Possible causes: Superfluid helium and heat during quench Seen in TQ coils Heat from heaters on inner layer Only in LQ coils Plans: Strengthen insulation or Change heater location or Add support on coil ID

Coil Processing: Impregnation Instrumentation traces Do laminated polyimide trace materials pose problems for impregnation? Trace behavior (bubbles) on inside bore after testing cycle have continued Inside bore of HQ02a during assembly (Coil 15 was previously tested in HQ mirror) Bubbles on inside bore of LQS03 after magnet test Topical meeting on QXF quench protection April 29, 2014

Topical meeting on QXF quench protection April 29, 2014