Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Advertisements

Proposed Des Moines Airport Authority Council Workshop – October 25, 2010.
Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with: I Aga Khan Foundation I BearingPoint I Bitrán y Asociados I BRAC University I Broad Branch Associates I Forum.
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program: A Review of the Program’s Development, Implementation and Results Ronald W. Rakow, Commissioner City of Boston.
FY16 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 1 Proposal March 4, 2015.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
DR MARIUSZ POPŁAWSKI LAW FACULTY UNIVERSITY IN BIALYSTOK Introduction to Polish Tax Law.
Conservation Districts in New York Training Module 1.
THE FUTURE OF THE ARVADA CENTER FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Chapter 70 Aid FY14 Budget 7/12/2013. FY14 Chapter 70 Summary Aid 73 districts receive foundation aid to ensure that they do not fall below their foundation.
Property Tax Relief 2011: Who Wins? Who Loses? 2011 Florida League of Cities Annual Conference August, 12, 2011 Alan Johansen.
3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
New Jersey School Boards Association – Serving Local Boards of Education Since 1914 State Budget Overview Presented by: Michael Vrancik NJSBA Director.
Medicaid Nursing Home Reimbursement Mark A. Leeds, Director Long Term Care and Community Support Services Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
FY17 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 27, 2016.
Village of Tarrytown Tentative Budget Fiscal Year 2012 – 2013 June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013.
REAL ESTATE TAXATION SYSTEM IN ALBANIA AND CHALLENGES FOR A EUROPEAN FISCAL SYSTEM Puleri Thodhori 1 Kripa Dorina 2 1) 2) University of Tirana, Faculty.
1 FY BUDGET PRESENTATION Board of Estimate and Taxation February 9, 2015.
1 Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer September 15, 2009 Overview of FY2010 Budget.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
City of La Palma The Path to Fiscal Sustainability: FY Budget Adjustments and Long-Term Response Discussion September 18, 2012.
Budget 2005/2006 Focusing on Our Priorities BUDGET CONSULTATION Social Care and Health Scrutiny Committee 25 th January 2005.
Federal Funding Overview and Risks
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Buckingham County Land Use Program Presentation
Principles of Good Governance
CITY SERVICES INSTITUTE
Excellence In Education
Improving Governance Governance arrangements in complex and challenging circumstances Ofsted HMCI survey Dec 2016.
Transforming the future of public health in Missouri
Today’s Agenda The importance of a conversation
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Finance & Human Resources
THE SELF SUSTAINING NON-PROFIT Golden Lessons From the Development and Corporate Sectors 14th Eastern Africa Resource Mobilization Workshop Paper.
The Washington county community development agency
Infrastructure Canada
Program Sponsorship You and Your Non-Profit
2018 Preliminary budget and tax levy SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
AD VALOREM TAX IN MISSISSIPPI
Freddie L. Johnson, JD, MPA
Social Impact Markets SIS13 Minjae Lee.
Academic Program Units (APUs)
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
Seekonk Board of Assessors
The Community Investment Tax Credit
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Restricted Gifts and Gift Acceptance Policies
Chapter 8: Business Organizations Section 4
RMAPI Town Hall Meeting
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
PROPOSED BUDGET Overview and Revenue Projections
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Economic Development Department Annual Financial Statements 2011/12
RELIABLE, & AFFORDABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Minor Amendments to Housing Incentives Policy
WPIC Research Administrators’ Forum
NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING PROGRAMS
An Uncertain Future Facing the Profession Towards 2020
Blockchain Technology: The safest way for better land governance?
Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) February 5, 2019
Expenditure Management
Community Benefit Activities
Presentation transcript:

Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program: A Review of the Program’s Development, Implementation and Results Matt Englander, Director of Tax Policy & Communications City of Boston Assessing Department

Agenda City of Boston Overview Tax-Exempt Property PILOT Task Force PILOT Task Force Recommendations PILOT Results Current Program Status Lessons Learned Questions Along the way, asking the right questions can often be as important as finding the right answers when it comes to PILOT matters

City of Boston Overview The Problem Heavily reliant on property tax revenue. Over 50% of the tax base is exempt. Under Proposition 2½ , the remaining taxable base can only grow by 2.5% per year. Existing PILOT Program lacked consistency & fairness between nonprofit contributors, and No local tax on payrolls or sales

City of Boston Overview Key Questions Facing the City How much would each institution pay in property taxes if exempt property were taxable? What is the cost of tax exemptions to Boston property owners? How do you reconcile the disconnect between institutional benefits and the cost of the tax exemptions? Institutional benefits accrue to any/all people, but it’s the Boston residents who bear the cost of the exemption

Tax-Exempt Property Exempt Property Valuation Used statutory authority to obtain detailed information on tax-exempt properties (e.g. size, plans, use, etc.). Updated tax-exempt values and shared data with respective non-profit property owners to ensure accuracy. If taxable, educational and medical tax-exempt property would have generated $345.0 million in tax revenue in Fiscal Year 2009. For context, the total tax levy in FY 2009 was $1.4 billion; a tax on tax-exempt property would have been nearly 25% of the total levy. Instead, the City collected $14.2 million in cash PILOTs (4.1% of what would have been collected if taxable)

PILOT Task Force In 2009, former Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino created a task force to examine the partnership between the City and its major nonprofits. PILOT Task Force consisted of the following members: 2 local college presidents 2 leaders from Boston hospitals 2 leaders from Boston’s business community 1 city councilor 1 union leader 1 community-based organization leader

PILOT Task Force PILOT Task Force Goals Set a standard level of contributions to be met by all major tax- exempt land owners. Develop a methodology for valuing community benefits. Propose a program structure that creates longer term, sustainable partnerships between the City and its nonprofit institutions. Clarify the costs associated with providing City services to nonprofits, and If necessary, provide recommendations on legislative changes needed at the City or state level.

PILOT Task Force Key PILOT Task Force Questions Should PILOT Program participation remain voluntary? Which institutions should be asked to participate in the PILOT Program? What is the formulaic basis for calculating PILOTs? How are PILOT programs administered in other areas? How should community benefits spending factor into the PILOT calculation? How can the PILOT Program be used to address major City priorities through City-nonprofit partnership? What are the unintended consequences, if any, to increasing PILOT requests?

PILOT Task Force Recommendations PILOT Program participation should remain voluntary All nonprofits owning property valued, in aggregate, over $15 million should participate Payments should be 25% of what an institution might pay on tax-exempt property if taxable Up to a 50% PILOT reduction for qualifying community benefits Payment formula to be phased-in over a 5-year period Institution will be credited for any real estate taxes paid on properties that would otherwise qualify for a tax exemption 25% level parallels the % that essential city services represent in the City’s annual budget Tax-exempt values were anchored at Fiscal Year 2011 level to allow institutions to plan for their annual payments 50% cap may be exceeded for exceptional circumstances

PILOT Task Force Recommendations Community Benefits Qualification Criteria Directly benefit City of Boston residents Support the City’s mission and priorities Offer ways the City and nonprofit can collaborate to meet shared goals Services should be quantifiable City must be consistent and transparent in its approach so institutions can plan appropriately

PILOT Results $8.7 Cash PILOTs have grown since implementation of new guidelines, but have begun to flatten out as leading institutions have scaled back their participation in light of non-consistent participation across the nonprofit sector.

Current Program Status City must continue to work closely with all PILOT contributors, including those who have not contributed, in order to maintain program momentum/growth Community benefits component still evolving; must establish a better link between City needs and institutional resources to partner prospectively Need to determine when/how to update tax-exempt property values to reflect current real estate market without disrupting participation rate Some institutions are keeping contributions flat in light of lack of participation from other institutions City recently hired a community benefits coordinator Value updates on hold for now

Lessons Learned Nonprofits have a strong preference for services over cash, but communities prefer cash PILOT guidelines do not take institution’s finances into consideration when calculating the PILOT (e.g., endowment, etc.) Museums and other cultural institutions can have very different financial challenges compared to hospitals and universities A PILOT program requires a strong partnership between a community and its nonprofits, and that relationship takes a lot of time, effort and commitment to build Challenge: make services more like cash to the municipality

Matt Englander, Director of Tax Policy & Communications Questions Challenge: make services more like cash to the municipality For more information on the City of Boston PILOT Program, please visit boston.gov/assessing Matt Englander, Director of Tax Policy & Communications matthew.englander@boston.gov -- (617) 635-4797