Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner
Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Regression Statistics
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. Population by University
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Table 1. Summary of SETE Factors Considered in Previous Studies
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 5. Organizational Procedures
Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff
MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers No. Questions 1. Is your academic background appropriate for the course you are going to teach? 2. How long have you been teaching Poetry Appreciation course? 3. Are you pleased or happy to teach the course assigned to you? 4. What are your perceptions about learning activities that you have completed? 5. Do you often prepare lesson plans and textbooks every semester? 6. In general, what is the objective of poetry appreciation in the Indonesian Language Education Department? 7. Do you often improve and add references used for teaching Poetry Appreciation course? 8. How do you manage the processes of poetry appreciation in your course? 9. What textbooks do you use these days? 10. Have you ever heard about character-based education textbooks? 11. In your opinion, what is a character-based education textbook? 12. Do you want to use character-based education textbooks? 13. Do you think that poetry appreciation textbooks are necessary to use? Oktaviani Windra Puspita et al. A Needs Analysis for Poetry Appreciation Textbooks in Universitites: An Exploratory Study. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, 357-361. doi:10.12691/education-5-4-3 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.