Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Influence of Friction Stir Welding Process Idealization on Residual Stress.
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Introduction of the Element Interaction Technique for Welding Analysis and Simulation.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Fatigue Limit Prediction of the Matrix of 17-4PH Stainless Steel Based on Small.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Two-Dimensional Unsteady Simulation of All-Vanadium Redox Flow Battery J. Thermal.
Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Nonconventional Tools on the Thermo-Mechanical Response of Friction.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Tool Wear in Cutting Operations: Experimental Analysis and Analytical Models J.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Cost-Effective Reliability Analysis and Testing of Medical Devices 1 J. Med. Devices.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Three-Dimensional Temperature Gradient Mechanism in Selective Laser Melting of.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Investigation of Boiler Pressure Behavior in Closed-Open-Closed System.
Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Centrifugal Casting of Microfluidic Components With PDMS
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Tool Path Generation for Turbine Blades Machining With Twin Tool
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Additive Manufacturing of Glass
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Anisotropic Materials Behavior Modeling Under Shock Loading
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Cloud Manufacturing: Current Trends and Future Implementations
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Examining the LEED Rating System Using Inverse Optimization
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/20/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: Solvent-free manufacturing process: (a) schematic of dry electrostatic spraying system, (b) representation of poorly mixed Li-ion battery electrode powders with agglomerations of additive particles, and (c) representation of well mixed Li-ion battery electrode powders with uniform distribution of additive particles

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: Contact mechanics of colliding particles: (a) contact interface and radius representation due to the collision of i and j particles and (b) representation of the i − j particle overlap due to collision

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: AM-BPA mixing. DEM simulation snapshots of AM-BPA mixing showing (a) premixing, (b) aggregation, and (c) intermixing. Analytical (d) and DEM (e) contour plots showing similar mixing behavior. (f) Comparison of mixing time found in DEM cases where intermixing and aggregation occurs.

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: AM-CPA mixing. DEM simulation snapshots of AM-CPA mixing showing (a) premixing, (b) intermixing, and (c) aggregation. (d) DEM contour plot showing the number of CPA in contact with the AM surface when the AM polar component is 2 mN m−1. (e) DEM contour plot showing the number of CPA in contact with the AM surface when the AM polar component is 100 mN m−1. (f) CPAs showing increased contact with higher polar surface energy AM as compared to low polar surface energy. (g) Comparison of mixing time found in DEM cases where intermixing and aggregation occurs.

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: BPA-CPA mixing: confirmation of analytical modeling results where a predicted intermixed case is confirmed by a DEM simulation (a) and where a predicted aggregation case is confirmed by another DEM simulation (b)

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: AM-BPA-CPA mixing: (a) DEM simulation showing mixing behavior of all three materials when the AM polar surface energy is 2 mN m−1 and (b) DEM simulation showing the mixing behavior of all three materials when the AM polar surface energy is increased to 100 mN m−1

Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Micro/Nanopowder Mixing Characteristics for Dry Spray Additive Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Electrodes J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2017;5(4):040902-040902-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037769 Figure Legend: Experimental mixing comparison: (a) SEM micrograph showing PVDF (representing BPA) particles attached to the surface of LCO (representing AM), (b) DEM confirmation of the experimental mixing result of AM-BPA with BPA particles attached to the AM surface, (c) SEM micrograph showing PVDF particles embedded within Super C65 carbon (representing CPA), and (d) DEM confirmation of the experimental mixing result of CPA-BPA with BPA particles embedded within the CPA