Loading of Phosphorus and Sediment to the South End of Cayuga Lake

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
Advertisements

Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Phosphorus in Southern Cayuga Lake and Its Tributary Streams A Public Information Forum February 27, 6-8 PM, Tompkins County Library Purpose 1.Present.
Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Flood Recurrence Intervals and the 100 Year Flood Concept Bruce F. Rueger, Department of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME
Paradise Stream Watershed Assessment – Preliminary Data Gap Evaluation Principle Investigator/ Presented by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, PASEO Co-PI’s: Dr. Dale.
Paradise Stream Watershed Assessment Data Gap Evaluation Principle Investigator/ Presented by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, PASEO Co-PI’s: Dr. Dale Bruns & Mr.
Regression Analysis of Phosphorous Loading Data for the Maumee River, Water Years Charlie Piette David Dolan Pete Richards Department of Natural.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Temporal and Spatial Variability in Nitrate in Subsurface Drains in a Midwestern Agricultural Watershed Paul Capel, USGS, National Water-Quality Assessment.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Bathymetry Changes Caused by a Tropical Storm Chris Scheiner and Gary Pelton US Army Corps of Engineers.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
Assessing Potential Effects of Highway Runoff on Receiving-Water Quality in Oregon using Surrogate Water-Quality Data Sets John Risley, Gregory E. Granato,
Larry Theller Bernie Engel Youn Shik Park Purdue University GLRI Project Corps of Engineers 516(e) Program. May 17-18, 2011.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Attachment B Water Quality Duration Curves for the Lower Eel River Watershed.
Stream flow estimation. Why try to estimate it? Gauges don’t exist on every stream Important for water quality modeling Permitting discharge sites Biological.
Watershed Two major factors define a watershed: Gravity and Topography
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Urbanized Stream Source Ratio October 20, 2015 Urban Stormwater Workgroup Reid Christianson, PE, PhD Neely Law, PhD Bill Stack, PE.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Mass Balance Assessment of 2014 Synoptic Survey Results: Dave Dilks Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force 2014 Workshop January 13,
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Herb Garn. Pheasant Branch watershed and monitoring locations USGS recording station Citizen Stream Monitoring site
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Brief Overview of Water Quality in the Cayuga Lake Watershed
Watershed Origins of Sediment Loads
What’s in Your Watershed? Fall and Virgil Creeks
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Using IDEM’s Fixed Station Data
Snowfall Runoff Forecasting in San Juan County, UT
Conclusions & Future Work
Case Study: Evaluating Retrofit Urban Best Management Practice Performance and Lessons Learned Nick Muenks, Marc Leisenring, Mark Willobee – Geosyntec.
Stormwater Runs to Local Waterways Untreated
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
Monitoring Data.
Examples of significant, long-term increases in baseline concentration of chloride for streams and rivers of the northeastern United States. Examples.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
John Babcock, Bruce Anderson, and Gary Ingman,
Defining and Targeting High Flows
Bixby Park 2018 Monitoring Compost Road Station Inlet Weir Outlet Weir.
Unit: Water and the Atmosphere
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

Loading of Phosphorus and Sediment to the South End of Cayuga Lake LOADEST Estimates Based on CSI-Volunteer Synoptic Sampling Partnerships, 2002-2013 Tompkins County Water Resources Council April 21, 2014

Cayuga Lake Watershed: CSI Monitoring Sites

Synoptic Sampling of Streams, From Mouth to Headwaters Volunteer groups monitor tributary streams in southern Cayuga Lake watershed “Monitor” means that groups perform synoptic sampling several times per year at fixed locations along a stream’s entire length CSI’s lab performs certified analyses of synoptic samples for phosphorus, sediment and other water quality parameters Results are posted on CSI’s website and may be searched and downloaded free of charg

Combine Synoptic Monitoring Results with USGS Flow Measurements Load = Concentration x Flow = mg/L x L/sec Transform units to get load in tons/year Concentrations come from synoptic monitoring Flows come from USGS gauging stations Flows estimated in absence of gauging station LOADEST Calculations by Dr. Matthew Yarrow

Simple step-by-step description of LOADEST Load Estimation Methodology More Info 1 Download Phosphorus concentration data from CSI Website Website 2 Download daily average and instantaneous flow data from USGS website 3 Download Latest LOADEST version (2013) and documentation 4 Calculate watershed area at CSI monitoring location - StreamStats 5 Estimate flows at CSI monitoring site using watershed are ratio method   6 Create Calib file for each analyte (SRP and TP) including instantaneaous flow estimations and CSI concentration data TP_Calib!A1 7 Create Est file using daily average flow data 8 Run LOADEST for Model 1 and using model auto-select option 9 Select model with best model fit stats for a given analyte and watershed Model Fit'!A1 10 Obtain load results from LOADEST for each parameter for selected model Load_Results!A1 11 Sum loads over water years to get final yearly load numbers Yearly Totals'!A1 12 Optional step: determine days with significant stormwater flow in order to estimate loads occurning during stormwater events versus days with base flow. Online baseflow separation tool LOADEST Documentation Runkel, R.L., Crawford, C.G., and Cohn, T.A., 2004, Load Estimator (LOADEST): A FORTRAN Program for Estimating Constituent Loads in Streams and Rivers: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 4, Chapter A5, 69 p.

Sediment Loading To Fall-Virgil Creek TSS Loads (tons/yr) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Davis Road Bridge 558 500 1502 409 733 Virgil Creek Freeville 1736 1686 6090 1083 2598 Fall Creek Freeville 1340 1220 3816 954 1807 Freese Road Bridge 7834 8435 35432 4118 13774 Cayuga Street Bridge 10946 10882 40862 6562 16996

Total Phosphorus Loading to Fall-Virgil Creek TP Loads (tons/yr) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Davis Road Bridge 2.86 2.49 6.10 2.37 3.48 Virgil Creek Freeville 2.95 2.59 7.02 2.32 3.72 Fall Creek Freeville 4.03 3.52 8.89 3.30 4.96 Freese Road Bridge 12.28 10.80 29.22 9.66 15.46 Cayuga Street Bridge 15.06 13.40 38.49 11.41 19.45

Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Loading to Fall-Virgil Creek SRP Loads (tons/yr) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Davis Road Bridge 1.46 1.27 2.95 1.24 1.75 Virgil Creek Freeville 0.92 0.80 1.87 0.78 1.11 Fall Creek Freeville 1.78 1.55 3.62 1.51 2.14 Freese Road Bridge 3.53 3.07 6.65 3.09 4.18 Cayuga Street Bridge 3.24 2.82 6.34 2.80 3.87

Sediment (TSS) Loading from Major Tributaries to Cayuga Lake (tons/year) 2011 2012 2013 Average Fall Creek Mouth 40,862 6,562 16,996 21,473 Six Mile Creek Mouth 30,241 3,202 4,343 12,595 Cayuga Inlet Mouth 43,388 8,366 8,475 20,076 CI – Farmers Market 51,933 7,642 8,191 22,589 Cascadilla Creek Mouth 2,240 633 615 1,163

Total Phosphorus Loading from Major Tributaries to Cayuga Lake (tons/year) 2011 2012 2013 Average Fall Creek Mouth 38.49 11.41 19.45 23.11 Six Mile Creek Mouth 17.56 4.57 4.55 8.89 Cayuga Inlet Mouth 45.26 13.42 12.61 23.76 CI – Farmers Market 45.80 11.91 11.40 23.04 Cascadilla Creek Mouth 3.88 1.74 1.56 2.39

Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Loading from Major Tributaries to Cayuga Lake (tons/year) 2011 2012 2013 Average Fall Creek Mouth 6.34 2.80 3.87 4.34 Six Mile Creek Mouth 2.12 0.99 0.89 1.33 Cayuga Inlet Mouth 5.18 2.21 2.02 3.14 CI – Farmers Market 4.84 2.10 1.92 2.95 Cascadilla Creek Mouth 1.26 0.60 0.54 0.80

Comparisons of Average Loads for Sediment (TSS), Total Phosphorus and Soluble Reactive Phosphorus 2011-2013 Average TSS Load (tons/yr.) 2011-2013 Average TP Load (tons/yr.) 2011-2013 Average SRP Load TP/TSS x 1,000 SRP/ TP Fall Creek Mouth 21,473 23.11 4.34 1.07 0.19 Six Mile Creek Mouth 12,595 8.89 1.33 0.71 0.15 Cayuga Inlet Mouth 20,076 23.76 3.14 1.18 0.13 CI – Farmers Market 22,589 23.04 2.95 1.02 Cascadilla Creek Mouth 1,163 2.39 0.80 2.06 0.33