Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 8 HLA Epitopes and Acceptable Mismatches for Sensitized Transplant Patients.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VIRTUAL PRA AND CROSSMATCHING
Advertisements

Case no. 7. Eva Honsova Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Pathology Department Prague, Czech Republic
PRA = 36% (21/58) Anti-A11 and B44.
Acceptable mismatches based on structural epitopes on HLA molecules Toulouse, April 2, 2008.
Rene Duquesnoy University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Complement in Heart Allograft Biopsies E. Rene Rodriguez W. M. Baldwin, III.
HLA TYPING D Middleton MDSC175: Transplantation Science for Transplant Clinicians (Online) POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP.
Objectives Overview of HLA genes and their function
HLAMatchmaker-Based Analysis of MICA Antibody Reactivity Patterns Rene J. Duquesnoy 1, Justin W. Mostecki 2, Jayasree Hariharan 2, Kristi Colacioppo 2,
HLA Ab, Donor Reactivity and Risk of Rejection and Graft Loss HLA Ab, Donor Reactivity and Risk of Rejection and Graft Loss Ronald H. Kerman, PhD The University.
RENAL TRANSPLANTATION INTO HIGH RISK, HIGHLY SENSITIZED RECIPIENTS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE Randy Hennigar PhD, MD Director, Nephropathology and Electron.
Antibody Detection Relevance of cII-Specific Antibody
Medical Interventions
Principles of Immunology Transplantation Immunology 4/25/06
Using HLAMatchMaker: Maternal-Fetal Incompatibility and the Risk of Disease Miguel Angel Gonzalez Mentor: Janet Sinsheimer, UCLA Hsinju Hsieh, UCLA Hsinju.
The Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation System
Epitope analysis with MatchIt software Ivan Balazs, Ph.D. HLA Epitopes in Clinical Transplantation Pittsburgh, PA June 15-16, 2011.
SOLID PHASE IMMUNOASSAYS: INTERPRETING PATTERNS Julie Houp, CHS Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Division of Immunogenetics and Transplantation.
Monitoring HLA-specific antibodies
1 Influence of donor & recipient risk factors and the choice of immunosuppression Long term outcome after renal transplantation Influence of donor & recipient.
Kidney Transplant vs Blood Type FIGHT!!. Overview.
Greater Consistency in Candidate and Deceased Donor HLA Typing Requirements Across Organ Types Histocompatibility Committee Spring 2014.
Interactive Case Discussion Case 6 Dr Megha S Uppin Asst Prof Dept of Pathology Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences Hyderabad.
Kidney transplant case Niels Marcussen Hans Dieperink Odense University Hospital.
The Ubiquitous HLA System: applications in transfusion and transplantation Dr Mary Purna Chacko Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology.
IMMUNOGENETIC TESTS.
Prognostic significance of C4-positive vs. negative rejection Heinz Regele Heinz Regele Department of Pathology Innsbruck Medical University Heinz Regele.
Single HLA Antigen Bead Data Interpretation: Normalized Ratios Peter Stastny Transplantation Immunology Division Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology.
1 Proposal to Update the HLA Equivalency Tables Histocompatibility Committee Fall 2015.
Current Trends in Transplantation Karin True MD, FASN Assistant Professor UNC Kidney Center May 23, 2011.
TRANSPLANTATION & tissue rejection
Am. J. Transpl : Immediate failure Kidney recipients Patel, Terasaki, N Engl J Med 280:735, 1969 with antibodies, pos XM 24/30.
1 OPTN/UNOS Histocompatibility Committee Fall 2015.
Donor Matching of Kidney Transplantation
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 7 HLA Epitope Based Donor Selection for Platelet Transfusions.
The significance of Focal C4d+: The WU experience Helen Liapis, M.D. Professor of Pathology & immunology Kedainis RL et al. Am J Transplant Apr;9(4):812-9.
Lecture 4 Registry of HLA epitopes and HLAMatchmaker analysis for antibody-verified epitopes.
Important for Sensitized Patients
Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation
Method Background Result Conclusion
Histocompatibility Committee
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 3 Antigenicity of HLA-DRDQDP Epitopes
2 Renal Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, BT9 7AB
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 2 Antigenicity of HLA-ABC epitopes Antibody reactivity analysis in different assays.
HKSHI HLA Epitopes Workshop
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Mechanism and Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection
Anand Yuvaraj International Transplant Fellow
CASE PRESENTATION DR SANJAY MAITRA, DR DENISH SAVALIA,
Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation  Johann Pratschke, Duska Dragun, Ingeborg A. Hauser,
2015 Kidney Allocation Task Force HLA Working Group
Transplantation Immunology
Transplantation Pathology
C. Chalklin, C. Colmont, A. Zaidi, J. Warden-Smith, E. Ablorsu
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
Kidney allocation to highly sensitized patients
Marcelo Pando UNOS Region 5 Collaborative March, 2017
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 6 Epitope Specificities of HLA Antibodies Tested in Ig- and C1q-Binding Assays and CDC.
Case 5 Helmut Hopfer Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Transplantation Immunology
Interesting Case Conference
Towards epitope matching in kidney allocation
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 4 Antigenicity of MICA epitopes
Figure 1 Identification of anti-HLA antibodies
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
Transplantation Immunology
Heterozygous for all alleles in MHC II
Does rituximab help in HLA desensitization for kidney transplantation?
Presentation transcript:

Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 8 HLA Epitopes and Acceptable Mismatches for Sensitized Transplant Patients

HLA Matching for Transplantation: The Traditional Way Count the A, B, DR antigen mismatches of the donor (range: from 0 to 6) Why do so many zero-antigen mismatches fail? Why are many mismatches successful? Avoid unacceptable mismatches for highly sensitized patients Why do we see so many graft failures? Many patients are never transplanted Desensitization with IVIG / plasmapheresis

HLA Antibodies Are Major Risk Factors for Graft Failure

Dealing with the HLA Antibody Problem Pre-transplant testing Serum screening and cross-matching Finding an acceptable mismatch Post-transplant monitoring Donor-specific HLA antibodies Biopsy pathology, C4d Desensitization Plasmapheresis IV-IgG Bortezomib

But what do antibodies see? Conventionally we talk about antibody specificities against HLA antigens Examples: anti-HLA-A1 anti-HLA-B7 anti-HLA-DR1 But what do antibodies see?

HLA Antibodies Are Important in Transplantation HLA antibodies cause allograft rejection and transplant failure HLA antibodies recognize epitopes Therefore HLA epitopes are important in transplantation

Epitope Specificity Analysis with HLAMatchmaker HLA-ABC epitopes HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 epitopes DQA1-DQB1 epitopes DPA1-DPB1 epitopes MICA epitopes

Purpose of Serum Screening Identify unacceptable HLA antigens (UNOS) Identify acceptable mismatches Represents a direct approach of finding compatible donors for a transplant candidate Eurotransplant uses the Acceptable Mismatch program in conjunction with HLAMatchmaker (Claas et al. Transplantation 78:190-193, 2004 Doxiadis et al. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17:536-540, 2005)

Eurotransplant’s Acceptable Mismatch Program Now Includes HLAMatchmaker Validation of HLAMatchmaker by direct cross-matches HLA-A mismatch Expected Observed negative negative 0 triplet 18 18 1 triplet 25 25 HLA-B mismatch Expected Observed negative negative 0 triplet 54 54 1 triplet 133 131 AM are Acceptable Mismatches 5-85% and >85% PRA are conventional ET-KAS cases Claas et al.: The Acceptable Mismatch Program as a Fast Tool to Transplant Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting a Post-Mortal Kidney: Short Waiting Time and Excellent Graft Outcome. Transplantation 78:190-193, 2004

Eurotransplant Patients, Leiden, The Netherlands Chances of Finding a Zero or Acceptable HLA-A,B Mismatch for a High PRA Patient (30 patients) Eurotransplant Patients, Leiden, The Netherlands

Chance to Receive a Suitable Crossmatch Negative Organ % patients transplanted Waiting time (months) ET-KAS and UNOS strategies are similar Slide provided by Frans Claas (Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands)

Post-transplant monitoring for epitope-specific antibodies Diagnostic tool for humoral rejection Does the transplant affect antibody detection?

Stages of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Takemoto et al NIH Consensus Report, 2004 Colvin and Smith, 2005

Effect of Allograft Nephrectomy on HLA Antibody Detection in Serum

Allograft Nephrectomy Case Donor Epitopes:   A3: 62QE,66RNV,70AQS,76VD,80GTL,144TKR,149AAH,151AHE,163DT A31: 56R,62QE,66RNV,74ID,76VD,80GTL,193AvV   B55: 131S   B63: 45MA,66RNM,70ASA,74Y,131S   Adeyi et al. Transplant Immunology, 14: 53-62, 2005

A3: 62QE,66RNV,70AQS,76VD,80GTL,144TKR,149AAH,151AHE,163DT Donor Epitopes (CDC-reactive epitopes are shown in underlined bold font)   A3: 62QE,66RNV,70AQS,76VD,80GTL,144TKR,149AAH,151AHE,163DT A31: 56R,62QE,66RNV,74ID,76VD,80GTL,193AV   B55: 131S   B63: 45MA,66RNM,70ASA,74Y,131S   Adeyi et al. Transplant Immunology, 14: 53-62, 2005

HLAMatchmaker predicts unacceptable mismatches Donor Epitopes (CDC-reactive epitopes are shown in underlined bold font)   A3: 62QE,66RNV,70AQS,76VD,80GTL,144TKR,149AAH,151AHE,163DT A31: 56R,62QE,66RNV,74ID,76VD,80GTL,193AV   B55: 131S   B63: 45MA,66RNM,70ASA,74Y,131S   HLAMatchmaker predicts unacceptable mismatches e.g. 45MA is present on B13, B46, B57,B62, B63. B75, B76, B77 Adeyi et al. Transplant Immunology, 14: 53-62, 2005

Challenging Question: What about the non-immunogenic epitopes? Donor Epitopes (CDC-reactive epitopes are shown in underlined bold font)   A3: 62QE,66RNV,70AQS,76VD,80GTL,144TKR,149AAH,151AHE,163DT A31: 56R,62QE,66RNV,74ID,76VD,80GTL,193AV   B55: 131S   B63: 45MA,66RNM,70ASA,74Y,131S   Challenging Question: What about the non-immunogenic epitopes? Did they induce specific B-cell tolerance? Adeyi et al. Transplant Immunology, 14: 53-62, 2005

Marrari M and Duquesnoy RJ: Transplant Immunology, 22:105-109, 2010 15th workshop project: 65 allograft nephrectomy cases contributed by 16 laboratories worldwide Antibody testing done with single allele panels on a Luminex platform DSA Pre-allonx Post-allonx Significance HLA-AB 64% 87% P=0.0033 DRB1 57% 86% P=0.001 DRB3/4/5 65% 78% P=0.22 DQB 76% P=0.18 Conclusion: although the Luminex antibody assay can detect anti-donor antibodies in the presence of a rejected transplant, it is apparent that the antibody specificity pattern is often incomplete especially against the HLA-A, -B and DR mismatches. Marrari M and Duquesnoy RJ: Transplant Immunology, 22:105-109, 2010