PREPARING FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPORT NEEDS TRIBUNALS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Educational Needs (SEN) Information Report
Advertisements

Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
Working in partnership with parents/carers
The New SEN Law THE CHILDREN & FAMILIES ACT 2014 EXPLAINED.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
The Employment Act 2008 – A Critical Overview Dispute Resolution & Tribunal Procedures: Overview of the New Procedures IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Appeals to the Upper Tribunal Against a Traffic Commissioner’s decision (Goods Vehicle Operator’s Licence) Jared Dunbar BSc, MA, LLB Associate, Dyne Solicitors.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Effective Advocacy in Discrimination Claims in the Employment Tribunal
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
SERN/EHRC Conference 2015 Running the case – a practical guide to preparing a discrimination case for the Employment Tribunal Presented by Peter O’Donnell.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
Working in the family courts – a guardian’s perspective Court Skills Training for Social Workers Manchester Civil Justice Centre 20 November 2015 Presentation.
Employment Act 2008 IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
Standard Circular 57 The purpose of this circular is to clearly set out the responsibility of educational establishments and services in the matter of.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Legal Issues and the Tribunal Jessica Burns, President 19 November 2010.
Exclusions and Reviews. Key Points Permanent exclusion should only be used as last resort Decision to exclude must be lawful reasonable and fair A permanent.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
TOPICS – THIS SESSION Domestic Enquiry Principles of Natural Justice
Procedural Safeguards
AN OVERVIEW ON THE MANAGEMENT OF MEETINGS
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Prosecution Process.
Court Review of Personal Insolvency Arrangement
The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Jane Sinson Educational Psychologist
Annual general meeting
Working in partnership
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW
Proposed Rule Changes Overview Stan Floras Tribunal Counsel
Informed Consent to Treatment
Candy Holder Head of Pupil Services
Mediation 20/04/2018.
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
#IncludED – ENABLE Scotland National Conference
The Courts: Procedure and damages for negligence cases
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Overview of the Children and Families Act 2014
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Information, Advice and Support Services – Are you Ofsted Ready?
Position of the Board of Appeal in the legal protection system for Community plant variety rights Gert Würtenberger.
Approaches to Witness Evidence in International Arbitration
Ask Us NottinghamShire
« Use of Experts: Strategic & Procedural Aspects »
Judge Jane McConnell June 2019
Presentation transcript:

PREPARING FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPORT NEEDS TRIBUNALS Elaine Falconer Legal and Democratic Services Aberdeen City Council March 2016

Objectives Understanding the role of the Tribunal Understanding the process of a reference to the Tribunal from start to finish Understanding Tribunal procedures and what the EA has to do to comply with those procedures Understanding the role of a witness for the EA in a Tribunal case

The Tribunal The Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 Panel of 3, Convenor and 2 others References/Appeals Disability Discrimination Claims

What can be referred Essentially all matters related to Co-ordinated support plans:- A decision to prepare a CSP A decision not to prepare a CSP A decision to continue a CSP following a review A decision to discontinue a CSP following a review A failure to meet the statutory timescales for preparing the CSP A decision not to comply with a request to establish whether a child or young person has additional support needs requiring a CSP A failure to respond to a request to establish whether a CSP is required Failure to comply with duties in terms of post-school transitions

And where a CSP exists ? The contents of the CSP A failure of the EA to review the CSP within the statutory timescales A decision to refuse a request to review the CSP A failure by the EA to provide the additional support contained in a CSP

Placing requests Where a CSP exists Where the CSP does not yet exist but it has been established by the EA that a CSP is required Where the CSP does not yet exist but the EA has issued its proposal to establish whether a CSP is required Where the EA have decided that the child or young person does not require a CSP and that decision has been referred to the Tribunal Whether or not a CSP exists, a placing request for a special school

ASNTS Statistics Annual report published every year - 2014/15 50 placing request references 11 Contents of CSP 5 CSP not required 2 Implementation of CSP 1 Deemed refusal of CSP I Timescales (Issue CSP) 2 transitions

ASNTS Procedure The Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2006 The Additional Support Needs Tribunal for Scotland (Disability Claims Procedure) Rules 2011 Rule 3 – the overriding objective - to enable a Tribunal with the assistance of parties to deal with references fairly and justly

Tribunal powers under the rules Make directions under rule 15 e.g. direct a party to provide any further information or to produce a document. Dismiss a reference Extend the time period for something to be done Suspend proceedings or postpone or adjourn a hearing Issue a citation for the recovery of documents Issue a witness citation Appoint an expert to enquire into and report on any matter

Hypothetical Tribunal Reference Placing Request Primary 7 school child on the autistic spectrum and with a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder. As a result of these conditions the child has difficulties with communication, social interaction and rigidity of thinking. His educational needs have been assessed by an EA Educational Psychologist who has built up a good relationship with the child over a number of years and has been involved in multi-agency meetings about the child and in transitions planning for the child moving to secondary school. Parents are not satisfied with the school planned for the child which is a mainstream secondary school with support. They make a placing request for an Independent special school. The Educational Psychologist is familiar with the Independent special school as some of the pupils for whom she has responsibility have been placed there by the EA.

EA Decision on the placing request The placing request is refused on the ground contained in paragraph 3(1)(f), namely all of the following conditions apply:- The specified school is not a public school The Authority are able to make provision for the additional support needs of the child in a school (whether or not a school under their management) other than the specified school It is not reasonable, having regard both to the respective suitability and to the respective cost (including necessary incidental expenses) of the provision for the additional support needs of the child in the specified school and in the school referred to in paragraph (ii), to place the child in the specified school and The Authority have offered to place the child in the school referred to in paragraph (ii).

The Reference 2 month time limit to make the reference Let’s Talk ASN Reference Form – ASNTS website ASNTS registers the reference ASNTS sends the Reference Form and Information for EA’s to the EA Standing Direction to EA’s on information on the child

Case statement period EA - 30 working days to lodge case statement, all documents upon which the EA intends to rely, standing direction information. Appellant – 20 working days within the 30 working days to lodge any case statement and all written evidence not already submitted List of witnesses. 2 witnesses in ASL Act reference, 5 in Disability cases. The bundle – the parties’ documents combined

Recording Evidence Precognition Witness statement Affidavit Report

The Case Statement The response to the grounds stated in the reference The basis on which the reference is resisted Which facts as set out in the reference or an the statement of case are admitted and which are disputed Any further facts on which the authority propose to rely The views of the child concerning the issues raised by the reference or the reason why these views have not been ascertained e.g. because the child is too young or has communication difficulties.

The conference call The Convener will normally hold a telephone conference call with parties’ representatives prior to the hearing Attended to by Solicitor for EA with or without any instructing officers present Preliminary issues e.g. as to competency Arrangements for the hearing – what witnesses are to be called – running order –views of the child There may require to be more than one call especially if directions are issued

Hypothetical case Awareness of the legal context of the reference is important Placing request appeal so the EA has to satisfy the Tribunal that the ground of refusal upon which they are relying exists as at the date of the Tribunal hearing itself. In addition they have to satisfy the Tribunal that it is appropriate in all the circumstances that the decision to refuse the placing request should be confirmed. Conditions 1 and 4 of ground (f) are factual – the specified school i.e. the Independent school – is not a public school and either a place has been offered at the mainstream secondary school to the child or it hasn’t.

Hypothetical case Condition 2 calls for evidence to be led that the EA is able to make provision for the additional support needs of the child in the mainstream school Condition 3 calls for evidence to be led about the respective suitability and the respective cost of the provision for the additional support needs of the child in the Independent school and the mainstream school.

The Hearing Venue – a location which is private and convenient for both parties. Neutral – not usually Council offices Timing – usually starts at 10am and finishes by 5pm Hearing is private although an application may be made to hear a case in public Witnesses – Information Note No 01/2014 Para 8 – Usually, witnesses are admitted to the hearing room for the purpose of giving their evidence and asked to leave once their evidence has been heard. Para 12 – When entering the hearing room the case officer will direct the witness where to sit which is usually at the table with everyone else – no separate table or witness box Para 13 – Usually the party who called the witness will ask the witness questions first. Examination -in –chief, EA Solicitor – leading questions (which by their form suggest the answer) on matters in dispute should not be asked since it is important the witness gives such evidence in his own words. Cross –examination - Appellant’s representative Tribunal questions Re-examination – EA Solicitor on matters arising in cross or questioning from the Tribunal

Questioning Techniques Guidance Note for Witnesses - ACC Know your evidence Body language Don’t waffle Speak up Measured Don’t rush Take some control Don’t speculate Professional

Hypothetical case The Tribunal would hear the witnesses from the EA The Tribunal would hear the Appellant usually and any witnesses for the Appellant The Tribunal would ascertain the views of the child Submission for the parties – summary of the facts, evidence heard and the law The Tribunal will weigh up the evidence heard from each witness and in particular whether it found the witnesses credible and reliable

The Decision Tribunal’s powers – to confirm the decision or to overturn the decision and require the EA to place the child in the specified school by a certain date. Decision may be given orally at the end of the hearing or decision letter issued. Anonymised decision may be uploaded to the ASNTS website after at least a 3 month period. Review by the Tribunal Appeal to the Court of Session