HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

LINAC4 and 3 MeV test stand at CERN
Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (Italy) DTL design status A. Pisent.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Code parameters optimization & DTL Tank 1 error studies Maud Baylac, Emmanuel Froidefond Presented by JM De Conto LPSC-Grenoble HIPPI yearly meeting, Oxford,
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
J. Rodnizki SARAF, Soreq NRC HB2008, August, 2008 Nashville TN Lattice Beam dynamics study and loss estimation for SARAF/ EURISOL driver 40/60 MeV 4mA.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
J. Alessi RF Structures EBIS Project Technical Review 1/27/05 RF Structures J. Alessi Some general thoughts on what our approach will be.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING A.Lombardi BCC 8-19 Nov 09 Linac4 BCC Nov 2009Alessandra Lombardi.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Beam Dynamics and Linac Simulation Petr Ostroumov Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN M. Pasini, Abingdon September.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then.
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
3 MeV Measurements at Lianc4 1 Veliko Dimov (for the source and linac team) (J-B Lallement, J. Lettry, A. Lombardi, D. Fink)
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Welcome to the RFQ Meeting
Linac4 & SPL Status of preparation and Opportunities M. Vretenar (R
Linac4 status and perspectives
NICA injection complex status
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
A. Martynov on behalf of accelerator division.
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Physics design on the main linac
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Tolerances: Origins, Requirements, Status and Feasibility
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
Part2: Cavities and Structures
1- Short pulse neutron source
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
CEPC Injector positron source
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
commissioning and measurements
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Studies on orbit corrections
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep30 2005 Beam dynamics in LINAC4 Edgar Sargsyan , Jean-Baptiste Lallement Alessandra Lombardi HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep30 2005

contents Changes to the layout and impact on the beam dynamics End-to-end simulations Open questions

Layout

Change # 1 : DTL-RF field Field ramp : 1.5 to 3.0 MV/m Phase law : -42 to -25 Constant field at 3.3 Mv/m in tank1 ; 3.5 MV/m in tank2,3 Phase law : -30 to -20

Effects of change # 1 Shorter DTL (13.4 vs 16.6m) 27 drift tubes in tank1 (vs. 41) Same beam dynamics Increased sensitivity to RF errors but tolerable same longitudinal acceptance

Change#2-DTL focusing FD focusing instead of FFDD Smaller beam radius Less sensitive to errors Less halo development Higher integrated gradient (70% more gradient for 20% less radius)

Effect of change # 2

Today’s focusing law FFDD in tank1 limited by the max quadrupole length (45mm) in a 3 MeV 352 MHz drift tube and the max gradient achievable by ITEP PMQ. FDFD afterwards Study ongoing to evaluate the effect of leaving a 3 meter section FFDD in a 70 m machine with FD everywhere…..

Change # 3 –accel phase Phase at -20 degrees also for CCDTL and SCL 5 meters shorter CCDTL, same length SCL

Sensitivity to errors Tracking the centre of the beam through the DTL-CCDTL-SCL with a field and phase errors of 0.5% and 0.5deg r.m.s. Results of 100 runs. No feedback correction Energy and phase jitter are limited to 5 degrees and 250 keV r.m.s. By Matteo Pasini

End-to-end : 4D waterbag RFQ input beam: Nparticles=50000 I=70 mA Win=95 keV ΔW/W=0.5 % (rms) Distribution=4D WB εx=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms) εy=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms)

End-to-end : gaussian RFQ input beam: Nparticles=50000 I=70 mA Win=95 keV ΔW/W=0.5 % (rms) Distribution=gaussian εx=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms) εy=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms)

End-to-end : 40 mA RFQ input beam: Nparticles=50000 I=40 mA Win=95 keV ΔW/W=0.5 % (rms) Distribution=4D WB εx=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms) εy=0.25 π mm-mrad (norm. rms)

Conclusion Changes to the design of the DTL have a positive impact on the layout and little effect on the beam dynamics A current of 70 mA, present baseline of the LINAC4, is at the limit of the acceptance of the chopper line and some re-matching is needed.