Online Ad Test Results July 2nd to 7th, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Findings from Recent Illinois Voter Survey Survey Conducted: May 12-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy.
Advertisements

Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
Civitas Institute Poll Presentation October 2013.
Lake Research Partners * Voter/Consumer Research 1 Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease A presentation on findings from a nationwide survey of 1,500 likely.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
April 22-24, 2001 / N=1,000 Registered Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes Nationwide for the #8633.
The Immigration Issue and the 2008 Presidential Election: Exit Poll of Hispanic Voters in Miami-Dade County, Florida and Los Angeles County, California.
BATTLEGROUND XXV. June 20-23, 2004/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today, and you had to make.
By: Michael Hebert. I think that they should have more television programs on the presidential debates shown to the first time voters. So they can vote.
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
1 National Poll of Jordanian Public Opinion Dr. Musa Shteiwi Jordan Center for Social Research An Independent, Non-Profit Think Tank Amman – Jordan on.
Perceptions of Faith Groups Survey of over 2,000 American Adults.
March 28-31, 2004/N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. BATTLEGROUND XXIV.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Survey Basics This survey involved 300 completed telephone interviews with registered voters in the Prescott School District. All interviews were completed.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
Key findings from a survey of 193 likely voters throughout the LaSalle-Peru High School District conducted June 4-8, 2016.
BATTLEGROUND XXIV. March 28-31, 2004/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today, and you had to make.
Institute for Social Policy and Understanding American Muslim Poll: Politics, Priorities and Prejudice in 2016.
Medicare, Social Security, and the 2016 Election
Medical Resident Work Hours
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Methodology – Phone Survey
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis
Asian American Survey - Illinois
Civic Engagement Strongly Tied to Local News Habits
Key findings from a statewide survey of 600 registered voters in Ohio conducted July 28th - August 1st, LORI WEIGEL JAY CAMPBELL
N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E.
BATTLEGROUND XXIX.
Media Comparisons 2016.
HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES AFL-CIO 2014 Election Night Survey.
Asian American Survey - Nevada
Families Against Mandatory Minimums Maryland Poll Results
Value of Advertising: Global Survey Results
Methodology Survey of 402 randomly-selected Larkspur residents
CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009
American Millennials Divided Over Same-sex Marriage
Protestant Pastors’ Views on Gay Marriage
Presidential Primaries Profile
Key findings from nationwide voter survey conducted July 2008 for
A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the
Waters of the United States
What does the public know and think about Zika?
Survey Methodology 1,042 online interviews with California adults
Using your story to elect Hillary in November
Trust Translates Into Influence As Multi-Screen TV Is Much More Likely To Influence Voters’ Final Decision Than Any Other Media Survey Fun Fact: 55% of.
Survey Methodology 1,042 online interviews with California adults
N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E.
Because Of This Attentiveness, It’s No Surprise That TV Is How Most Voters Are Likely To First Learn About Candidates And Issues Survey Fun Fact: s.
Voters Of All Demographics Are Deeply Concerned Over The Influence That “Fake News” May Have On Elections “I Am Concerned About The Influence Fake News.
THE 2008 ELECTIONS: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?
Finance Strategy Session: Earn Every Vote
Coalition to Promote Choice for Seniors
Finance Strategy Session: Earn Every Vote
No Labels: “Break the Gridlock” Congressional Poll
n=503 Likely Voters MoE=±4.4% August , 2017
2019 Tennessee Tobacco & Vape Policy Poll
J Street National Democratic Primary Survey
J Street National Democratic Primary Survey
Online Ad Test Results July 2nd to 7th, 2015.
An opinion essay.
Reflective Democracy National Survey.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Puerto Rican Diaspora Findings and Recommendations from two statewide surveys in Florida and New York May 2019.
Los Angeles County Public Opinion Landscape
Presentation transcript:

Online Ad Test Results July 2nd to 7th, 2015

Research Methodology David Binder Research conducted an online survey from July 2nd to July 7th. The sample was N=2000 battleground voters likely to vote in Democratic Primaries and Caucuses. Demographics were matched to the likely electorates of New Hampshire and Iowa. Respondents were randomly assigned into one of eight demographically similar cells of N=250 that each saw a different ad. The margin of error is 6.2% per cell. The structure of the survey was demographics, horserace, favorability, ad, ad descriptions, horserace, favorability, attributes.

Review of Ads 75 17 37 20 38 47 25 45 100 80 no yes Yes Chance Family Mom Believe Champion Everything Promise Reshuffle % Biography/Family 75 17 37 20 % Accomplishment 38 47 % Vision/Plan 25 45 100 80 Mention Hedge Funds no yes Yes Deck Stacked Middle class mean something again Thanks John Rimel

Summary Overall Strength = Overall Strength Chance 586 Mom 554 Believe 552 Reshuffle 548 Everything 542 Champion 530 Promise 518 Family 498 Overall Strength = HRC Vote + Very Favorable + Attributes (Strongly Agree) + Says What She Believes + Ad Descriptions (Strongly Agree)

Horserace, Favorability, and Speaking Believe Reshuffle Promise Mom Family Chance Champion Everything Clinton Vote Movement +4 +5 +1 Clinton Very Favorable Movement +9 +10 +7 +8 Says what she really believes (trade-off) 63 66 58 64 61 62 Says what people want to hear 26 28 34 21 27 Top two scores are highlighted for each metric Q8, 22. And if the Democratic Primary Election were today, for whom would you vote? Q10,23. Please indicate if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of each of the following. Q24. With which do you most agree – HRC says what she really believes or HRC says what people want to hear?

Percent Strongly Agree Attributes Percent Strongly Agree Believe Reshuffle Promise Mom Family Chance Champion Everything Is sincere 36 35 33 37 32 39 Is someone you trust 34 30 Is straightforward 38 40 Will fight for people like you 44 Is in touch with the lives of everyday Americans 31 26 29 Is someone who will get things done 41 48 45 42 Total 217 202 225 198 232 210 218 Q25-30. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about Hillary Clinton?

Percent Strongly Agree Ad Descriptions Percent Strongly Agree Believe Reshuffle Promise Mom Family Chance Champion Everything This ad is believable. 35 42 37 49 40 47 39 This information is new to me. 14 9 13 18 10 7 The ad would get my attention if I saw it on TV or online. 45 38 This ad addresses issues that are important to me. 62 58 57 61 Total 156 149 146 125 172 153 Q17-20. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about this ad.

Summary by Gender; Gaps seen for family/bio ads Overall Strength = HRC Vote + Very Favorable + Attributes (Strongly Agree) + Says What She Believes + Ad Descriptions (Strongly Agree) Overall Strength Men Women Chance 557 608 Mom 538 565 Believe 508 583 Reshuffle 520 567 Everything 545 Champion 473 572 Promise 477 548 Family 421 556 This ad addresses issues of importance to me, % agree: Men Women Chance 61 77 Mom 71 83 Believe 93 92 Reshuffle 88 Everything 90 Champion 84 Promise 87 Family 73

Conclusions Reactions to all of the ads were positive. All eight were effective at improving Clinton’s favorability and vote. Ads scored well on attributes and ad descriptions. Open-ends indicate that the two main concerns raised about the ads were whether Hillary can accomplish the things she sets out to, and whether she is connected to the middle class. Chance and Mom seemed particularly effective, in part because they convinced voters that she came from humble beginnings. Family also made this case, although not quite as convincingly. Reshuffle, Everything, and Promise laid out a plan for America’s middle class that resonated with many voters and scored well overall. Champion and Promise were somewhat less effective.