INFN and University of Florence Test Beam Meeting Tracker Week

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
Advertisements

Quality Assurance of Silicon Strip Detectors and Monitoring of Manufacturing Process Thomas Bergauer Institute f. High Energy Physics HEPHY, Vienna SiLC.
IAP-PAI 25/05/20051 CMS Si Rad. Hardness Introduction Damage in Si Neutron tests => Beam => Irrad. Setup.
X5 TEST BEAM preliminary studies Outline  Voltage scan  PLL scan + Neighbour Strips  Sensor Uniformity  Comments  Special Trigger (Friday)
January 22, Run IIB Silicon workshop Purdue University Bortoletto Daniela, Bolla Gino, Canepa Anadi Hamamatsu testing I-V characteristics up to 1000V.
Using the EUDET pixel telescope for resolution studies on silicon strip sensors with fine pitch Thomas Bergauer for the SiLC R&D collaboration 21. May.
Recent TOB Developments First LT failure and Stereo Module Status J. Incandela With slides provided by E. Chabalina, A. Affolder, Dean White.
October 2001Module Construction meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Discussions on validation of irradiated MODULES W. de Boer, F. Hartmann.
1 Module produced with low R int sensors-Anthony AffolderSensor Meeting, Feb 11, 2004 Modules Produced With Low R int Sensors Anthony Affolder UCSB.
6/22/2015Tracker Week April 2002IEKP 1 Summary of IQC-workshop IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)
October 2001Module Construction meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Discussions on validation of irradiated MODULES W. de Boer, F. Hartmann.
First Proton Irradiation of CMS Sensors W. de Boer, A. Dierlamm, A. Furgeri, E. Grigoriev, F. Hartmann, F. Hauler, L. Jungermann, Ch. Piasecki.
LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005 Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
Embedded Pitch Adapters a high-yield interconnection solution for strip sensors M. Ullán, C. Fleta, X. Fernández-Tejero, V. Benítez CNM (Barcelona)
Sensor overview Ulrich Heintz Brown University, Providence, RI 6/18/2015U. Heintz - Sensor Overview 1.
October 2001General Tracker Meeting IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 1 Results on proton irradiation tests in Karlsruhe F. Hartmann IEKP - Universität.
February, 2004CMS Tracker Week1 Sensor Stability Measurements Objective: find simple method of observing sensor stability -> measure fluctuations in overall.
Full-size ATLAS Sensor Testing On behalf of the ATLAS R&D group Development of n-in-p Silicon Sensors for very high radiation environment Jan Bohm Institute.
Quality Test of L1 sensors HPK 10 sensors –Tested all, 6 sent to Fermilab – Test structures, HPK 133 L00 CDF ELMA 9 sensors –Tested 6 of 9.
Anna Macchiolo, Status of Process Qualification Centers, Sensor Meeting, 31st Oct 2001 Status of Process Qualification Centers Florence, Strasbourg, Vienna.
1 CPC2-CPR2 Assemblies Testing Status Tim Woolliscroft.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Testing Site Qualification Purpose: –Perform detailed scans of the silicon microstrips to make sure they all work. –Check HPK. Candidates for Certification:
Update of CMS Process Quality Control Sensor Meeting, CMS TK Week, , CERN Florence Anna Macchiolo Carlo Civinini Mirko Brianzi Strasbourg Jean-Charles.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Paul Dolejschi Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs SVD.
Run Iib Workshop Dec 12-13, 2002 Silicon sensors procurement and quality assurance WBS Regina Demina Kansas State University.
Production Readiness Review of L0/L1 sensors for DØ Run IIb R. Demina, August, 2003 Irradiation studies of L1 sensors for DØ 2b Regina Demina University.
Paul Dolejschi Characterisation of DSSD interstrip parameters BELLE II SVD-PXD Meeting.
Studies on n and p-type MCz and FZ structures of the SMART Collaboration irradiated at fluences from 1.0 E+14 to 5.6E+15 p cm -2 RD50 Trento Workshop ITC-IRST.
Juan Valls - LECC03 Amsterdam 1 Recent System Test Results from the CMS TOB Detector  Introduction  ROD System Test Setup  ROD Electrical and Optical.
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
Influence of humidity on the IV characteristics A.Chilingarov Lancaster University ATLAS SCT Week CERN,
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Panja Luukka. Silicon Beam Telescope (SiBT) Group Since 2007 a collaboration of several CMS institutes has been operating a silicon micro-strip beam telescope.
AC―coupled pitch adapters for silicon strip detectors J. Härkönen 1), E. Tuovinen 1), P. Luukka 1), T. Mäenpää 1), E. Tuovinen 1), E. Tuominen 1), Y. Gotra.
INFN and University of Florence Test Beam Meeting Tracker Week
Karlsruhe probe equipment and QA proposals/expertise
Status of PQC Florence, Strasbourg, Vienna
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Irradiation and annealing study of 3D p-type strip detectors
Study of radiation damage induced by 24/c GeV and 26MeV protons on heavily irradiated MCz and FZ silicon detectors N. Manna Dipartimento Interateneo di.
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Roberto Chierici - CERN
X5 quasi offline Analysis
TCAD Simulation of Geometry Variation under HPK campaign
TIB module performance at X5 Test beam – preliminary studies
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Anna Macchiolo, PQC Firenze
Update of US Testing Status
Results from module testing
US Module Production Quality
Recent TOB Developments
Module Production Status in Florence
News from CMS Process Quality Control
Module production in Italy
The measurement set-up
CORRELATION BETWEEN LEAKAGE CURRENT AND NOISE
Modules Produced With Low Rint Sensors
Metal overhang: an important ingredient against “micro-discharge”
Module Testing in Florence Carlo Civinini INFN-Florence
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
TIB contribution for the X5 - May 2003 Test Beam
Recent TOB Developments
Recent TOB Developments
The Effect of Highly Ionising Particles on the APV25 Readout Chip
May Test Beam Analysis – Sensor Homogeneity – Preliminary!
Presentation transcript:

Hysteresis@TIB.Test.Beam by Anna Macchiolo INFN and University of Florence Test Beam Meeting Tracker Week October 23rd, 2003 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Introduction A hysteresis effect has been observed in the TIB modules  S/N values depend on the voltages at which the modules have been biased before (memory of the recent biasing history) During the test beam in May 2003 several voltage scans have been performed (0  Vmax  0) Scan # 1 TIB (peak) RUNS 1196-1204, 120 GeV Muons Scan # 2 TIB (deconvolution) RUNS 30024-30054, 120 GeV Pions RUNS 30133-30175, 120 GeV Muons Scan # 3 TIB+TOB (deconvolution) 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Modules and sensors in the beam-test The TIB modules (equipped with sensors HPK) where the beam was impinging during the voltage scan were: Mod #2 – IB2 302 202 261 065 24 V-depl. =180 V (substrate)=2.5 KW cm Mod #5 – IB2 302 202 261 242 41 V-depl= 138 V (substrate)=3.2 KW cm All the 6 TOB modules (equipped with sensors OB2 STM ) were hit by the beam 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Module # 6 TIB- Dec. Mode In a “standard” operative procedure (bias voltage driven directly from 0 V to the working point) the expected performance have been found, both for TIB and TOB modules Deconvolution mode S/N (TIB)~18 @350V S/N (TOB)~24 @350V 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan # 1 – Peak – TIB Modules time 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan # 2 – Deconvolution –TIB Modules S/N time 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan # 2 – Deconvolution –TIB Modules Signal Noise t t 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan # 2 – Deconvolution – TIB Modules t Decreasing the bias voltage the cluster width increases The difference in the average cluster width between the two modules are due to the different inclination wrt the beam direction 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan # 3 – Deconvolution – TOB Modules t 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” How the hysteresis effect shows up for the TIB modules in the beam-test data ? For instance in deconvolution mode at 300 V: The signal decreases (8 %) The noise increases (9 % ) S/N decreases (17 %) The cluster width increases (16 %) 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” From beam-test to the lab The increase of the cluster width and of the noise can be linked to an increase in the inter-strip capacitance (C_int) of the sensors. In the lab we studied the C_int behavior repeating bias cycles similar to those done in the beam test. Lab measurement scheme (PQC) 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Inter-strip capacitance measured in the CAP-TS-AC structure HPK 20 minutes @ 450 V 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Inter-strip capacitance measured in the CAP-TS-AC structure HPK D C-int (250V) = 5 % 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Inter-strip capacitance measured in the CAP-TS-AC structure HPK D C-int (250V) = 10 % 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Time dependence of the inter-strip capacitance Measurement as a function of time at constant bias 0.718 pF 22’ 3’30” Measurement done @ V_bias = 250V when the structure has been kept 75 minutes @ 450V HPK 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Inter-strip capacitance measured in the CAP-TS-AC structure STM No hysteresis effect observed in the same experimental conditions 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” A hypothesis From PQC standard measurements we know a hysteresis effect that affects HPK test structures only: the interstrip resistance drops by several orders of magnitude (from hundreds of G to hundreds of M) when the substrate has been biased to high voltages This phenomenon verifies only when the environment relative humidity is quite high (>30-40 %). The relative humidity measured for the TIB modules during the beam test is: Scan 1 (runs 1196-1204) RH ~ 45-50 % Scan 2 (runs 30024-30054) RH ~ 45-50 % Scan 3 (runs 30142-30175) RH from 60 % to 4% (nitrogen flux in TIB box) During all the beam test time the TOB modules have been kept under nitrogen with low relative humidity (~ 4 %) All the lab measurements shown before have been done with RH ~ 45-50 % 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

TIB test beam relative humidity 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

Under low humidity conditions… RH < 25% HPK 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” At relative humidity close to 0% 360 GW IV on mini-sensor up to 700 V R-int before and after bringing the substrate at 700 V 147 GW from J.C. Fontaine (PQC Strasbourg) 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” At relative humidity close to 50% 21 GW R-int before and after bringing the substrate at 700 V. 9 GW Hysteresis from J.C. Fontaine (PQC Strasbourg) 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Finally… Noise measurements, inv on, common mode subtracted done with the ARC system Noise RH ~ 50 % Noise RH < 10 % t 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Scan 3 – Deconvolution – Module 2 TIB During the first ramp up the TIB box has been fluxed with nitrogen, so the other measurements have been taken with a relative humidity close to 3% Order of magnitude of the hysteresis (15%) in the previous scan 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”

C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis” Conclusions The hysteresis effect observed for the TIB modules during the X5 beam test voltage scans can be related to the interstrip capacitance and resistance behaviour of the HPK sensors PQC studies show that hysteresis effects on Cint and Rint disappear if the measurements are done at relative humidity less than 35-40% Hysteresis free results are obtained for the TIB noise lab measurements (done after the beam test) and for the TIB S/N scan performed during the May test beam at low relative humidity Since ST sensors don’t show any hysteresis a possible mechanism that produce this effect could be traced to the difference in the oxide thickness and composition among the two manufacturers. 23/10/2003 C. Civinini – INFN Firenze - “Hysteresis”