Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations The planning concept - current status Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC.
Advertisements

Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2002 by Carnegie Mellon University July 2002 Pittsburgh, PA Lecture 6: Team Planning.
MISSION OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE CARGO INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS BRANCH Brion J. Au Johnson Space Center/DO55.
DAVOS, November 2010 group GETCU (JP Marcovici) PICARD : Consortium meeting 1 PMOD/WRC Davos november 2010 Présenté par : JP. Marcovici Sigle.
Software to Manage EEP Vegetation Plot Data A design proposal Michael Lee January 31, 2011.
Mission Operations in Small Satellite Projects Making Mission Operations Effective J. Burkert Colorado Space Grant Consortium.
Submitting Book Chapters via Manuscript Central A Short Guide for Wiley-VCH Authors.
User Interface Theory & Design
RSOC System Testing Status - 1 RSOC System Test Concept –Covered in RO-EST-PL-5013 –Status to be presented at key system reviews (GSRR) Connectivity Tests.
Flight-like Flight Software Testing Methods Celina A Garcia Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ©2009 California Institute of.
The FP7 How to submit a project electronically AN INFORMATION POINT FOR FP7 IN PALESTINE: Training Seminar of experts Nicosia, Cyprus November.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
SAS_08_ Architecture_Analysis_of_Evolving_Complex_Systems_of_Systems_Lindvall Architecture Analysis of Evolving Complex Systems of Systems Technical Presentation.
Generic Instrument Processing Facility Interface Specifications A. BuongiornoFrascati 12 /10/2012 ESA EOP-GS 1.
Corotweek n°9 - ESTEC December 6th, 2005 COROT PROJECT STATUS 1 COROT PROJECT STATUS Thien LAM TRONG.
1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Declaring a Product Operational Instructions / Guidance This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to recommend to the SPSRB.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
User Interface Theory & Design Lecture 6a 1.  User interface is everything the end user comes into contact with while using the system  To the user,
SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.
1 SMOV Proposal Process Initial Submission through Flight George Chapman Merle Reinhart Tony Roman February 21, 2001.
Space Operations as a Guide for a Real-World Scheduling Competition Eduardo Romero Marcelo Oglietti
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC
Planetary Missions Division Dvk, 16 Jul 2002 Interfaces - presented at the SWT #10 To clarify the situation with interfaces, formats, etc. Summary: There.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
SPICE Production at ESTEC April SPICE Production at ESTEC 2 Overview SPK/CK production SCLK production FK and IKs production Other Kernels.
Planetary Missions Division Dvk, 26 Jun 2002 Pointing scenario - presented at the SWT #10 Daily schedule Overall status/How to proceed Status of inputs.
1 Proposal and Observation Handling Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC May 11, 2011.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations Experimenter to RSOC interfaces Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC
1/106 December 2001Rosetta SOWG Status of the Rosetta Project TestBed (PTB) P. van der Plas Modelling and Simulation Section ESA/ESTEC ESA/Estec 6 December.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
P. Mokashi IES Team Meeting, SwRI 29 May IES (SwRI) Develop sequences (flight and EQM test) Develop tables, macros and patches if necessary Test.
Background  EM16 SGS+TEC met with FD 1 year ago  Both sides agreed that there was a “performance gap:  SGS prepared a TN with 2 main options to bridge.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 SOC-Instrument Team interfaces CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
TMP3413 Software Engineering Lab Lab 01: TSPi Tool Support.
E-USOC operations in Increments José Miguel Ezquerro Navarro E-USOC/UPM Jul 2010POIWG#28 - Huntsville, AL.
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
ACES User Interface Workshop #1 Prototype Inspection 22. November 2011.
University of Kansas Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dr. Susan Gauch April 21, 2005 I T T C Introduction to Web Technologies.
Mission Planning Concepts
The road to the first E2E tests
Rosetta Science Working Team Meeting #26 Working Group #1
Architecture Review 10/11/2004
RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009
Instrument Teams to SOC Test Specifications
Mission Operation (MO) Services
Software Testing.
Stubbe F. Hviid OSIRIS Team Meeting November 2005
Pre-landing Orbiter Observations
I&T&C Organization Chart
SPICE, el servicio de información geométrica para ciencias planetarias
Geometric information for VIRTIS-M data
Rosetta Science Ground Segment Overview
Mars Swingby (MSB) information
RLGS Status / LCC B. Pätz, DLR/MUSC.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
The RSP Archive System RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
the Cluster Active Archive
Financial Energy Management System (FEMS) Re-engineered by IT Department IT, H.O. Mumbai. 26 November 2018.
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Request Form You gain access to the Request Form from your intranet set-up by your IT dept. Or the internet via either our desktop launcher icon. Or a.
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Data Quality 2 (DQ2) & Staff Reporting Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC Interfaces to RSOC Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC Detlef.Koschny@rssd.esa.int Introduction Reminder: Rosetta Ground Segment Architecture Interface in the different planning cycles The ftp interface to RSOC File naming conventions What happens after submission?

Architecture during individual commissioning Experiment User Manuals Experimenter supports FCP execution RMOC executes FCPs Project Scientist approves uplink FCP = Flight Control Procedure = piece of paper with list of telecommand s Additional tasks of the Science Operations Team: Convert PI input into Excel files for ESOC Support overall planning Generate Scenario Parameter Lists in the case Pis need pointing in their individual commissioning Provide computer interface for passing Lander Operation Request files and convert them to PORs

Architecture during nominal science operations Flight Control Team (FCT) Ground Segment Management SOC Management RSOC POR File Flight dyn. Request files Science ops planning Timeline Integration Science Sequence Assembly Flight Dynamics Team (FD) Stations and Facilities Management Command history Pointing modes, trajectory Architecture during nominal science operations Trajectory, attitude Telemetry Data Archiving / Handling Raw data Data Systems RMOC Science communications, databases Raw data, auxiliary data, h/k Raw and Cal. data DDS Request Raw data Operational Requests, Pointing Requests Lander Operations Plan PI Teams EPS (tbd) Sequence Builder Data Analyst POR = Payload Operational Request file RMOC = Rosetta Missions Operations Centre @ ESOC RSOC = Rosetta Science Operations Centre @ ESTEC DDS = Data Disposition System Experiment Sequence Building Experiment Data Analysis Experimenter teams

Interfaces in the different planning cycles - I Planning cycles and concept was described in SWTs/SOWGs. Here just a summary (for nominal comet ops – for cruise ops similar, but different time scales): Long-term planning (several months – years) Define science themes Define overall science priorities and top-level timeline Define standard observation sequences Ensure proper modelling of the instruments at RSOC Medium-term planning (monthly) Define trajectory and pointing skeleton Check resources on top level Have “preliminary ITLs” available, based on standard observation sequences, e.g. exposure times still open Short-term planning (weekly) Final ITL files with all details to RSOC RSOC does final resource and constraint check Sends final POR to RMOC to add s/c commands – iterate when conflicts ITL = Input Timeline

Interfaces in the different planning cycles - II Long-term planning (several months – years) Interface is text in User Manuals, emails, discussions in meetings, telecons. Medium-term planning (monthly) For trajectory and pointing: submit Scenario Parameter Lists (SPL) to RSOC, Word template, currently done via email “preliminary ITLs” currently done via email, will go to ftp interface (see next vu-graph) Short-term planning (weekly) Final ITLs via ftp interface Database maintenance Database change request via ftp interface Software maintenance Software change request and associated patch via ftp interface

The ftp interface to RSOC Described in the RSOC to Experimenter ICD, RO-EST-IF-5010/1a, 15 Apr 2003 Electronic inputs from Experimenter teams, e.g. experiment software patches, shall be sent as computer files using the FTP application to the RSOC FTS computer. Use the following procedure: ftp rodds.esa.int username <press enter> password <press enter> cd requests_to_RSOC put filename.ROS filename.TMP rename filename.TMP filename.ROS quit   filename shall follow the FTS convention ffff_sordes_txxxxxxxxxxxxxx_vvvvv.ROS FTS = File Transfer System

File naming convention filename shall follow the FTS convention FFFF_SORDES_Txxxxxxxxxxxxxx_vvvvv.ROS FFFF: File type. Most important one: OIOR = Orbiter Instrument Operations Request, I.e. an ITL file SOR: Source. For OSIRIS always ‘PI7’ DES: Destination, always ‘RSO’ T: type, always ‘D’ xx…xx: Description field – see ICD for details VVVVV: ‘Version’ number – really a sequential count number. Needs to increase by one for each submission .ROS – always ‘ROS’ for Rosetta (.VEX for Venus Express)

What happens after submission? The input file is picked up by the “Operational File Request Acknowledger (ORF-A)”, a skript that Checks the file name for correctness For OIOR files, checks whether they follow ITL syntax Generates an acknowledgement (file type ‘ACKN’), containing a confirmation of the receipt of the file and possible error reports ftp’s the acknowledgement back to the experimenter’s computer Generates a log file entry which can be viewed via a web-based interface When the deadline for the inputs is reached, RSOC personnel will: look at the files consolidate all inputs from the teams perform resource checking iterate if needed with experimenter teams; generate a POR file, submit it to RMOC Uplink to spacecraft, and do it! Downlink data available via DDS RSOC products submitted are also available via the DDS