TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Obesity at Diagnosis Is Associated with Inferior Outcomes in Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer 1 The Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Efficacy.
Advertisements

Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Prognostic Utility of Secretory Phospholipase A 2 in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease M. O'Donoghue, Z. Mallat, D.A. Morrow, J. Benessiano,
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
AGA/ASCO/ASTRO/SSO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Orlando, FL January 26, 2008 Circulating tumor cells: are they predictive markers? Neal J. Meropol,
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
AR-V7 Splice Variant in Prostate Cancer : Taking Centre Stage
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free.
R2 김재민 / Prof. 정재헌 Journal conference 1.
R3 조 욱 Salivary Transcriptomic Biomarkers for Detection of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Articles LEI ZHANG, JAMES J. FARRELL, HUI ZHOU, DAVID ELASHOFF,
DEMONSTRATION OF USING SPSS Logistic Regression Models for Prediction 2016/11/71.
Blood-based biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Tumor mutational burden in blood (bTMB) is associated with improved atezolizumab (atezo) efficacy in.
Emerging Genomic Technologies: Extending the Application of Genomics to Prediction, Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Early Detection Luis A. Diaz, M.D. Johns.
Prognostic impact of Ki-67 in Croatian women with early breast cancer (single-institution prospective observational study) Ivan Bilić, Natalija Dedić Plavetić,
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Earlier treatment and lower mortality in infants Initiating ART at
Prognostic Implications of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Pazopanib and Sunitinib Ajay Raghunath1,
Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer:
Immunoscore Prognostic in Colon Cancer
Fig 1A. Patient enrollment flow chart
Presented By Michael Lee at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
Blackwell KL et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 61
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
The NEW ENGLNAD JOURNAL of MEDICINE 368;18 MARCH 28, 2013
Novel Pretreatment Scoring Incorporating C-reactive Protein to Predict Overall Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Sorafenib Treatment Liver.
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Oncol Res Treat 2016;39: DOI: /
Picture 3. Higher grade tumors are more frequently Ki67 positive
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
3 Clinical profiles and outcomes in 1203 newly diagnosed patients with systemic AL amyloidosis: first analysis of the ALchemy study. Richa Manwani.
RAAS Blockade: Focus on ACEI
Benefits of switching postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years adjuvant tamoxifen: Combined results.
MicroRNAs for the Prediction of Early Response to Sorafenib Treatment in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Cancer 2017;6: DOI: /
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
WT G>A G>C G>T (n = 93) (n = 21) (n = 10) (n = 51)
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Transcriptional Signature of Histone Deacetylases in Breast cancer
Noninvasive Molecular Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Cell-Free Tumor DNA  Giulia Biancon, Silvia Gimondi, Antonio Vendramin, Cristiana.
Molecular Analysis-Based Treatment Strategies for the Management of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer  Howard West, MD, Rogerio Lilenbaum, MD, David Harpole,
A subgroup analysis of a large multicenter study
Learning More from Microarrays: Insights from Modules and Networks
Time-dependent patterns of treatment effect and failure as an explanation for the predictive role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in stage II and III.
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Epithelial-Specific Methylation Marker: A Potential Plasma Biomarker in Advanced Non- small Cell Lung Cancer  Chanida Vinayanuwattikun, MD, Virote Sriuranpong,
Can Determination of Circulating Endothelial Cells and Serum Caspase-Cleaved CK18 Predict for Response and Survival in Patients with Advanced Non–Small-Cell.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
CoPrincipal Investigators
PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS
Biostatistics Primer: What a Clinician Ought to Know: Hazard Ratios
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
M Javanbakht, S Guerry, LV Smith, P Kerndt
GOCS GRUPO ONCOLÓGICO COOPERATIVO DEL SUR
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
THE LANCET Oncology Volume 19, No. 1, p27–39, January 2018
Figure 1. Identification of three tumour molecular subtypes in CIT and TCGA cohorts. We used CIT multi-omics data ( Figure 1. Identification of.
Figure S1. A. B. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival by treatment group in soluble heregulin (HRG)-high population (A) and soluble.
Fig. 1. Classification of the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival estimates for the OS of patients using the pSPC in Cohort_C and in the overall population.
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram.
Presentation transcript:

TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study collaborative group founded in 2005 to conduct innovative and high-impact clinical trials for breast cancer. Whole blood and tissue were collected prospectively from women with Stage 4 metastatic breast carcinoma(MBC) following disease recurrence after prior therapy, as well as from healthy controls. the first biomarker study designed specifically to prospectively test as a primary end point the role of DNA methylation in blood in predicting disease progression and survival in breast cancer. cMethDNA assay Developed a highly sensitive high-throughput quantitative multiplex methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assay named cMethDNA to detect circulating cell-free methylated DNA. Figure 1. The cMethDNA assay. A, reference DNA (50 copies of each gene-specific standard; STD) was spiked into 300 μL serum and total DNA was purified. Nested PCR was performed where the first PCR reaction (step 1) contained one pair of external primers per gene (forward and reverse) that coamplifies DNA from the gene of interest (TARGETgene) and the gene-specific standard (STDgene). In the second PCR reaction (step 2), amplicons of step 1 are assayed by absolute quantitative real-time PCR with specific sets of primers (forward and reverse) and hydrolysis probes (in two colors) recognizing methylated TARGETgene or reference STDgene.

Result >> Study schema >> patient characteristics of our analytic population Serum was available to evaluate the CMI in duplicates at two time points (at baseline and at week 4) in 129 women, and at a third time point for 112 of the 129 women. Information on CTCs was available at baseline and at week 4 for 96 women. Median follow-up for the cohort was 19.5 months (range, 0.8 to 86.3 months).

Result >> 10-gene panel consisting of novel and known breast cancer hyper-methylated markers The inter and intra-batch CVs for any of the genes were , 18% (the majority having a CV , 10%), which is considered acceptable. - methylation index (MI): 전체 유전자 중 메틸화를 보인 유전자 수의 비 - cumulative methylation index (CMI): the sum of the MI for all genes

Result In the multivariable models described in Table 2, patients with a high CMI at week 4 had a significantly worse PFS (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.60; P = .002) after adjusting for age, ethnicity, prior therapy, tumor phenotype, and disease burden. Similar results for OS (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.54; P = .003) are illustrated in Table 3. change in log CMI from baseline to week 4 was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.34; P , .001) and PD at first restaging (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.01; P , .001).

Result The median PFS among women in the high versus low CMI group was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.2 months) versus 5.8 months (95%, CI 4.7 to 7.4 months) The median OS was almost a year shorter for women in the high (12.3months; 95%CI, 8.4 to 16.5months) versus low (21.7months; 95% CI, 19.3 to 28.3 months) CMI group Fig 1. Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) progressionfree survival and (B) overall survival by CMI at week 4 for women with metastatic breast cancer. Landmark analysis at week 4 excluded patients encountering events before blood draw at week 4. A horizontal line indicates median survival times. Gehan tests were stratified by subset resulting from random split of the data with the two-fold cross-validation. CMI, cumulative methylation index; HR, hazard ratio.

Result The association between CMI levels at baseline, at week 4, and at first restaging and disease status as early as first restaging Women with responsive (P , .001) or stable (P , .001) disease were more likely to have a reduction in median levels of the CMI from baseline to week 4 (Fig 2A). As was the case with the CMI, CTCs at week 4 were reduced in women with responsive disease (P = .0001; Fig 2B). However, in contrast to CMI, CTC levels were not significantly different by disease status at first restaging (P for trend = .457; Fig 2B). numeric changes in CTC level between baseline and week 4 were not associated with treatment response. Women with a high CTC level at both baseline and week 4 compared with those with a low CTC level had a worse PFS and OS.

Result examined the prognostic significance of the CMI and CTCs in 96 women in whom both markers had been measured. Suggest that the addition of either the week 4 CMI or CTCs significantly improved the ability of a model of established risk factors to predict PFS (P , .001and P = .038 for the CMI and CTCs) and OS (P = .043 and P = .007 for the CMI and CTCs).

Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the promise of early changes in the level of circulating cell-free tumor-specific DNA methylation for clinical application in patients with MBC. CMI levels of a novel six-gene panel measured 4 weeks after the initiation of a new therapy and a novel quantitative assay known as cMethDNA have clinical usefulness as a predictor of survival outcomes in women with MBC the CMI and CTCs at week 4 seem to be complementary as prognostic markers, but both the CMI and a change in the CMI were stronger predictors of PFS when contrasted directly with CTCs. When predicting treatment response at first restaging, CTCs were more specific (85%) in identifying low-risk (stable or responsive) disease compared with the CMI (51%), whereas the CMI was more sensitive (78%) in identifying high-risk (progressive) disease than were CTCs (30%). must be validated to determine the clinical usefulness of the cMethDNA assay for specific treatments and tumor phenotypes in patients with metastatic disease and early-stage breast cancer.