Graduate Center – City University of New York

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

E-Learning Center Deanship of Academic Development.

Advertisements

Yvan Rooseleer – BiASC – MAY 2013

U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA Measuring Student Perspectives on University Experiences.

Opinions about Distance Education at Pace A New Attitude? Jim Stenerson, Director Center for Teaching, Learning & Technology & Christine Moloughney Coordinator.

Blended Learning: An overview Sandra Dowie, MA, MBA E-Learning Development Officer Office of the Vice Provost (Information Technology) University of Alberta.

The New Learning Technologies. 2 Learning Delivery Systems What are they? –Means by which educators deliver critical content and concepts to students.

Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Peter Diplock Assistant Vice Provost 2.

Spring Faculty Meeting. Spring Faculty Meeting Sal Monaco, Dean The Graduate School of Management & Technology February 5, 2005 UMUC Inn & Conference.

Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.

NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.

Distanced Professional Education to Support Instructional Technology: A Cost Effective Necessity Shawn M. Cressler December 2012.

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 5: Systemic.

Educational Leadership and Planning for Technology Chapter 8 – Distance Learning Dr. Anthony G. Picciano.

Online Learning at UMass Dartmouth Jen Riley Faculty Instructional Technology Coordinator CITS/Instructional Development For Faculty Senate Meeting October.

Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,

Reaching Beyond the Distance The promise of blended learning is to bring together the best from traditional on-campus and distance ed. models. We need.

Colleen Worrell Virtual High School Blended Learning: Strategies for Success.

The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.

ASD 21ST CENTURY SCHOOL LIBRARIES. A Look at Library 2.0 The library connects us with the insight and knowledge, painfully extracted from Nature, of the.

An Online Learning Case Study Board of Governors Distance Learning Workshop March 23, 2011 Dr. Joel L. Hartman, Vice Provost & CIO University of Central.

Models of Blended Learning. Educational Models Blending: It’s All Local Near campus Lecture Capture Online Blended On campus Far from campus Face-to-Face.

Innovative Techniques and Emerging Issues Confronting Classroom Teaching R. Elaine Turner, PhD University of Florida.

Distance Learning - Trends and Issues CAAHEP Summer Workshop July 19, 2013 Boston, Massachusetts Darcy W Hardy, PhD.

Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.

Blended Learning Models: Strategies for Transformation

9.1 Chapter 9 Technology in English and Language Arts Instruction M. D. Roblyer Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 4/E Copyright © 2006.

Institution: Teaching Training College “Dr. Joaquín V. Gonzalez” Subject: Workshop on Multimedia Applied to the Teaching of English Work: Summary on Chapter.

Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.

Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.

ABDULMALIK ABDULSABUR TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION LARGO HIGH SCHOOL.

Online Course Pedagogical Design: Strategies and Practices Shuyan Wang, Ph.D. The University of Southern Mississippi.

Blueprint for Effective Conversion to Distance Education by Tamara Dawson e-Learning Instructional Designer Southern Nazarene University.

+ Copyright © 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Smaldino, Lowther, and Russell Instructional Technology and Media for Learning, 10e.

E-learning. Studies and confusion Technology-driven definitions Delivery-system-oriented definitions Communication-oriented definitions Educational-paradigm-oriented.

TechEd 2005 Linda Ehley Alverno College Digital Portfolios: A Learning Construction Zone.

Overarching CIE Mission To develop a comprehensive system for the professional development of the instructional workforce in pedagogy and best practices.

New Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Bertram C. Bruce Nicholas C. Burbules Scott D. Johnson James A. Levin.

Achieving quality in technology-supported learning: the challenges for elearning and distance education. Ron Oliver Edith Cowan University Perth, Western.

ETEC Assignment 2 Group Reflection Paper Western Stars: Blanche Boles, Dairo Carrillo, Feng-Ting Chiu, Gilberto Chulin, Lloyd Martinez, Isaura Williams.

Incorporating “Online” Components in Your Face-to-Face Teaching Center for Learning & Development Spring 2011 Faculty Teaching Series.

Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.

Q Education Transform Resources. Intel® is Committed to Transforming Education for the Next Generation Intel supports education transformation 

Opportunities in Contemporary Distance Education Trends in Plant Breeding Workshop Lincoln University February 20, 2009 Benjamin Kehrwald.

Foundations of American Education: Perspectives on Education in a Changing World, 15e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Teaching.

UW/AOS/SSEC/CIMSS Using Instructional Technologies Philosophy and Examples of Steve Ackerman.

Patricia Brennan PhD, RN, MS

e-Learning Our view and experience

NERCOMP conference March 30, 2011

MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula

Leading Innovation in Global Education & Training

Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition

Dr Strini Pillay and Dr Lavern Samuels 11 November 2016

Exploring Blended Learning as a High-Impact Pedagogy Option

Assurance in Open and Distance eLearning

in 2009, questions about the types of technologies commonly used to support teaching & learning were administered to 31,000 students attending.

Blended Teaching The “What”, “Who”, “Why” and “How” of

Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June.

Anthony (Tony) Picciano – City University of New York

Student Accessibility Services Getting You Started

Incorporating “Online” Components in Your Face-to-Face Teaching

The Teacher e-Portfolio Project for Northern Ireland

OF “TEACHING STAFF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT” AND

Chapter 9 Transforming Professional Practice

Peter Weber, Ed. D. Deputy Superintendent Mark Secaur

Final Exam Reflection IDT3600 SARAH HERBERT.

MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

Research in Medical Education

Presentation transcript:

Graduate Center – City University of New York Blending with purpose Anthony G. Picciano Graduate Center – City University of New York September 15, 2010

Presentation Outline Why blended learning? Faculty v. Institutional perspective? Defining Blended Learning Blending with purpose – Faculty/Pedagogical perspective Blending with purpose – Institutional perspective

WHY BLENDED LEARNING? Faculty reasons different than overall institutional reasons. Faculty are concerned about their own courses and programs but do not always have institutional perspective. To scale up blended learning from individual faculty doing their own “thing” requires institutional commitment and resources.

Defining Blended Learning Conventional Face to Face Classroom Fully Online Source: Picciano, A.G. (2007). Chapter 1 in Picciano, A.G. & & Dzuiban, C. (Eds.) Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/books/index.asp

Defining Blended Learning Minimal Technology/Media Students meet online - teacher uses simple technology such as CMS, social networking, electronic bulletin boards, Students meet f2f – teacher uses simple technology such as email, or web for e-lectures. Blended Blended Conventional Face to Face Classroom Fully Online Students meet f2f – teacher uses technology in class such as interactive simulations, digitally controlled experiments Blended Blended Students meet online – teacher uses more advanced technology such as videoconferencing Technology/Media Infused

Blending with Purpose – The Multimodal Model For Faculty - Pedagogical Objectives/Activities -> Technology Content (CMS/Media/MUVE) Reflection (Blog,Journal) Social/Emotional (F2F) Blending with Purpose Dialectic/Questioning (Discussion Board) Collaboration/Student Generated Content (Wiki) Synthesis/ Evaluation (Assignments/Assessment) Papers, Tests, Student Presentations (PPT, Youtube), E-Portfolios

Institutional Perspective - Planning for Technology Environment College/University Academic Program Hardware Software Staff Facilities Finances Culture/Values Goals Apply Technology Evaluation Feedback Picciano, A.G. (2011). Educational Leadership and Planning for Technology, 5th Ed. Copyright © 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc.

Blending with Purpose – For Institutions - Mission, Goals, Objectives -> Technology Blend to assist students – Access Improve Learning Information Fluency Graduate in a Timely Fashion Blend to support faculty – Professional Development Improve Teaching Blend to maximize facilities – Recapture Classroom Space Blend in response to societal needs – Workforce Development Lifelong Learning Globalization Partnerships 8

Blending with Purpose – Institutional Perspective -> Challenges, Scalability Stable Technology Infrastructure Faculty/Professional Development Instructional Design Support Student Support Services Funding 9

Blending with Purpose – Institutional Perspective -> Evaluation Student Access – Enrollment Growth, Attrition, Graduation Rates Learning Effectiveness - Student Outcomes (However Defined) Faculty Satisfaction – Perception of their Teaching Student Satisfaction – Perceptions of their Learning Cost/Benefits

REFERENCES Picciano, A.G. (2011). Educational Leadership and Planning for Technology (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Picciano, A.G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(1). Kent, OH: Kent State University. http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/view/11 Picciano, A.G. and Dzuiban, C. (Eds.) (2007). Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.