Risks of different events

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Technology Taming the nucleus?. Outline Controlled Fission Reactions. Fuel enrichment Neutron moderation Control rods Nuclear Plant Design and.
Advertisements

Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases.
Uranium Enrichment Nuclear Bomb Test Little Boy Reactor Core.
THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Possible Routes to Fissionable Materials Considered by U. S. in 1942 Natural Uranium (99.3% U-238, 0.7% U-235) Gaseous.
IAEA Sources of Radiation Nuclear Fuel Cycle – Enrichment Day 4 – Lecture 6(2) 1.
N UCLEAR E NERGY A background to the Nuclear debate and the Rainbow Warrior.
PHYSICS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Nuclear Binding Energy.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
Laser Enrichment of Uranium: Power Promises and Proliferation Perils Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Philip D. Reed Senior Fellow for Science and Technology.
"Why are Iran's nuclear technology efforts of critical concern to Israel's security?” Mike Natelson.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
Nuclear Arsenals Dennis Silverman, U C Irvine Source: Energy and Problems of a Technical Society, by Jack J. Kraushaar and Robert A. Ristinen.
© HarperCollins Publishers 2010 Interpretation Was World War Two a global war?
NUCLEAR POWER Is it good or bad?.
By Carl Anderson What do you think about when you hear nuclear?
Nuclear energy at a crossroads. Benefits Reactors generate electricity without adding to global warming/air pollution. Small amt. of U gives off large.
Nuclear Energy Wastes. What ways can we reduce the wastes produced in the reactor core. How can uranium be separated from Plutonium?
The Nuclear Club Who’s in? Who’s out? And where do we go from here?
IP How nuclear reactors work © Oxford University Press 2011 How nuclear reactors work.
Objectives To introduce fusion and fission as sources of energy
Nuclear Energy By: Elisa Fatila April 6, 2006.
Nuclear Power Plants. History of nuclear power 1938– Scientists study Uranium nucleus 1941 – Manhattan Project begins 1942 – Controlled nuclear chain.
 Principles of nuclear energy  Fission reactions  Nuclear reactor  Nuclear power plants.
Reprocessing. Reprocessing is tricky Reprocessing: separating the elements in the highly radioactive spent fuel Small reactors that produce medical isotopes.
By Jake Wilner. Summary  Who: P5+1 (U.K., U.S., Germany, France, Russia, China, and the European Union) and Iran.  What: A deal halting Iran’s uranium.
1945 to 2005 The ability of mankind to destroy itself HISTORY AND HOPES FOR THE FUTURE Richard Wilson Harvard University talk at: Sandia National Laboratory.
Japan By: Mason Bryan, Dakota Coogle, and Ryan Murphy.
The Env. And Society Ch. 1 sec. 2. Sharing Common Resources  Ocean – transporting and fishing  Neighborhood Park - sports, outdoor activities.
Nuclear Weapons Number of operational warheads in the U.S. nuclear stockpile, according to the Pentagon. The figure is down from a peak of 31,225.
ISOTOPES IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS. PLUTONIUM-239  Symbol 239 Pu  Produces 235 U  24, 100 years  Decays by alpha radiation  Protons= 94 Neutrons= 145.
Weapons of WWII Objective: Analyze the weapons created and used during WWII Std /
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear power is generated using Uranium, which is a metal mined in various parts of the world. Some.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors Martin W. Metzner November 19, 2007.
Growth and the Business Cycle (or Trade Cycle). Growth and the business cycle Actual and potential economic growth.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9i – slide 1 of 20 Session I.4.9i Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9iFuel Cycle - Reprocessing IAEA.
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
1945 to1993 The ability of mankind to destroy itself HISTORY AND HOPES FOR THE FUTURE Richard Wilson Harvard University Conference on Global Emergencies,
Nuclear Power. What Is Nuclear Power? Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy, which generates heat. The energy produced.
ET It is December of 1957 – 12 ½ years after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it’s just been announced that the US has opened its first.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
Nuclear Power  Period 1  Benny Situ  Paolo Tolentino  David Liang.
P4 6 mark question practice. Electricity can be dangerous, if a fault occurs in a circuit a shock could be fatal. Describe two safety measures used.
DESIGING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. WHEN MOST PEOPLE THINK NUCLEAR ENERGY, THEY THINK BOMB. THEY THINK, “OH, MY GOSH, TERRORIST ARE GOING TO STEAL THE FUEL AND.
John Preston Structure of the Atom p np n Nucleus.
Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases in binding.
Nuclear emergency Japan Some resources excerpted, Nuclear Energy Institute, Wikipedia, etc.
They are very deadly bombs made to kill and wipe out entire cities. Nuclear bombs.
Isotope Separator Isotope separation is the process of concentrating specific isotopes of a chemical element by removing other isotopes. E.g., separating.
Nuclear Energy: Good, Bad, or Ugly? By: Russell Dehaut, Courtney Sperger, and Craig Hughes.
Uranium Enrichment Louis Croquette.
SUMMARY OF GAS COOLED REACTOR DEVELOPMENT
Sources of Radiation Fuel Cycle - Overview
State of Nuclear Power Helsinki, 8 May 2009.
The Most Visited Countries
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
What does it take for the DPRK to be a nuclear threat?
Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD ANS Teachers’ Workshop 2013
Relative Stability of Different Nuclei
Nuclear Power Student Work.
Chapter 1 Section 2: The Environment and Society
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium
Nuclear Energy.
World War 2 By Trent Watkins.
Ella Simon, Alex Horb, Grant Steiner
Plutonium.
Who Has the Bomb? US 1945 USSR/Russia 1949 UK 1952 France 1960
Was the dropping of atomic bombs justified?
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium
2006 Rank Adjusted for Purchasing Power
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
Presentation transcript:

Criteria for Non-Proliferation in the Nuclear Power Industry Richard Wilson Harvard University

Risks of different events Natural Radiation Nuclear War Cigarettes Asteroid 1 Million Air Pollution Arsenic EPA Regulations Nuclear Accident Nuclear workers

(1) The ease of making a nuclear bomb from the facility being protected must be LESS THAN the ease of making a bomb in the absence of the facility (2) The nuclear power industry must be designed to increase rather than decrease, those open contacts that reduce the desire of a country or person to make bombs

(1) It is better to have a neighbor who has no bombs (2) Some powerful countries that have no bombs (Canada, Germany, Japan)

Nuclear industry can reduce proliferation A. Recognize the problem B. Understand the problem C. Keep eyes and ears open Ultimately, only an open society can prevent proliferation

Time needed to make a bomb:

USA: 4 years 1941- decision 1945- test

UK, USSR, France, China a bit slower- approximately 5 years

Pakistan: 15 years Iraq: greater than 8 years

Germany and Japan : 1 year (now)

Can this time be shortened with Nuclear Power?

Uranium Bomb U Simple Extraction U3O8 UF6 Flouorine Chemistry Calutron Gaseous Diffusion Centrifuge Nozzler Laser Isotope Separation Bomb Design Gun Compression

Plutonium Bomb As before with the Uranium Bomb Reactor Pu Separation Bomb Design (Compression) Preignition Heat

How Can the Nuclear Industry Reduce the Risk of Nuclear War?

General Increase Prosperity

Use a Network to Discourage Bombs Specific Use a Network to Discourage Bombs

The Risk of Nuclear War is Large Enough that a Small Relative Increase is Unacceptable

By Making Material Processes Available the Nuclear Power Industry can Inevitably Increase Proliferation Risk

1950’s Illusions Nuclear Power is completely decoupled from Bomb Making It is not possible to make a Bomb with Reactor-grade Pu

Reactor Grade Plutonium Sakcharov said it is not possible to make a bomb with reactor grade Plutonium in 1977 BUT Serber in 1942 and Mark in 1991 said this was possible (as have Carwin and others)

Understand the Problem and Keep Your Eyes Open