PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Under New Management : Developing a Library Assessment Program at a Small Public University Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable,
Advertisements

2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
Design of Reusable Multimedia Resources to Deepen Information Literacy North Carolina State University Libraries Kim Duckett Principal Librarian for Digital.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
1 AFA Conference Fall 2011 Chandler-Gilbert Community College Critical Thinking Project
Instructor Survey Responses Spring 2008 Office of Academic Planning and Assessment.
Division Action Plans in Student Affairs Putting Student Learning First.
Faculty Development Module: Align Learning Tasks with Learning Outcomes H. Jean Bryan DePaul University.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Advancing Campus Internationalization Through an Integrated Approach: The Role of Languages and Cultures Across the Curriculum Regional Meeting of the.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
Blazing Trails: On the Path to Information Literacy: lighting the path to collections through collaboration Brena Smith and Alison Armstrong, UCLA Library.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Collaborative Learning Environment Preliminary Report - DRAFT December 2008.
Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Cultivating Information Literacy Competencies with E-Learning Technology Lisa Santucci / Rob Withers Miami University Libraries.
MDC Quality Enhancement Plan Mathematics Discipline Meeting Update March 5, 2009.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Professional Development Training “Expanded Training”
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright.
Assessing Progress on the QEP: Status Update Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003.
CARL-N Mini-conference Students and Faculty Perspectives: Are We Engaged Yet? Presented by Yuhfen Diana Wu Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library San Jose.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Collaborative Learning Environment Preliminary Report - DRAFT October 22, 2008.
What Is Humanities? Get Help In Humanities Homework Assignment
AU Strategic Planning Stakeholder Engagement Survey
Laura Hart Joyce Frazier
Creativity in math and science (CMS)
Get Your Head in the Cloud
Learning to Flip the Classroom Using a MOOC Learning Community
Emerging Technologies Engage Students
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Alamance Community College
Becoming an Online Teacher
Student perceptions of the use of multimedia for online course communication A Research Study.
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
ENGINEERING A BRIDGE TO INFORMATION LITERACY
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director
Maximizing Success and Retention in Developmental Courses and Beyond
Using Strategies, Protocols, and Tools to Analyze Data A Presentation of the National Reading Technical Assistance Center (NRTAC) Speaker’s notes Additional.
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Steve Krevisky (MXCC)
Imagine Success Engaging Entering Students Innovations 2009
Dean of the Lash Division of Teaching and Learning
Qualtrics Proposal Gwen Gorzelsky, Executive Director, TILT
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Update from ECO: Possible Approaches to Measuring Outcomes
Item # Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Use & Satisfaction – Services.
The Heart of Student Success
NEPf-Aligned Student Perception Survey Implementation
E-moderating Dr. Deborah Bordelon Ms. Elizabeth Moore Rhodes.
Learning Community II Survey
Accreditation follow-up report
Module 4 Using Data for Decision Making
Writing Non-Instructional Outcomes
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities

Presenters: Maureen Pettitt Skagit Valley College Gillies Malnarich Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education

Session Outline Why this survey? Development Survey items Feedback/revision Fall 2009 Survey Priorities Future Priorities An Invitation

Thinking about learning

Thinking about learning What behaviors and/or activities create more than mere rote learning?

Survey Development The survey was created as a result of input from colleges and universities involved in the Assessing Learning in Learning Communities project who expressed the need for a survey that examined students’ experiences in learning communities, especially with regard to integrative learning. Washington Center approached Skagit Valley to help design and administer the online survey.

Goals Collect national data about the “what” and “how” of substantive learning in learning communities Use that data to guide the creation of online resources and tools that help faculty to enhance students’ -- and their own -- experiences in the learning communities

Definitions Learning community (LC) Integrative learning A common cohort of students who attend two or more classes together in which they experience an explicitly designed opportunity for integrative learning. Integrative learning the intentional integration of ideas and/or practices drawn from two or more disciplines (or areas of expertise) which invite new questions, understanding, explanations, and applications.

Development Process Review of literature and surveys about student learning and integrative learning Draft multiple versions (lots and lots of revisions!) based on: Input from colleagues across the country Recommendations made by students in a Skagit learning community – instructors used a “think aloud” protocol to identify and revise questions which lent themselves to different interpretations

Survey Elements Students’ engagement in classroom activities (You just responded to some of those questions!!) Instructors’ activities that support learning Students’ perceptions of gains made in their own understanding and abilities Students’ perceptions of the mental activities they engage in in the LC versus other courses

Students’ Experiences of Learning in Learning Communities Fall 2009 - National Pilot Establish liaison with learning community leads and institutional research offices Administer ~ 250 surveys per participating college Trouble shoot technical aspects and get feedback on logistics and survey questions (“revise again!?”)

A few quotes about revising... “There are always too many words at first.” Jacques Barzun “Forced to weigh your words, you find out which are the styrofoam and which are the heavy gold.” Ursula K. Le Guin “All first drafts are shit.” Ernest Hemingway

Issues Thus Far…. Individualizing survey – for example, additional questions Institutional Review Board – colleges will deal with this at the local level Limiting the pilot to 250 surveys per college – ok we bent a little on that, but don’t tell  Limitations of Remark software – especially the requests for college-specific questions

Students’ Experiences of Learning in Learning Communities Winter 2010 Compile and send data results to fall 2009 pilot schools Summarize and respond to feedback Revise online survey based on pilot feedback Post new survey for use at minimal cost (e.g. $50 for every 250 surveys) with goal of making survey available for mid-term use

Students’ Experiences of Learning in Learning Communities Spring 2010 Analyze data from all participating campuses (i.e. broad sweep of classroom practice) Adapt “small group instructional diagnostic” to supplement mid-term survey use Draft a prototype resource list and faculty development module based on survey results Report early findings to national learning communities community via listserv

Students’ Experiences of Learning in Learning Communities Summer 2010 Begin work on faculty development section of Washington Center website Build network of IR specialists and LC leads interested in deepening research on students’ experiences of learning in learning communities Seek funding for further development of this work

Faculty Development Modules (in design) Sample Question “Work on an assignments that require integrating ideas, strategies, or skills from classes (or disciplines) included in this learning community” Faculty development module could include: References about designing integrated learning from Washington Center’s National Project on Assessing Learning in Learning Communities Teaching practices drawn from Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATS) and collaborative learning techniques

CCSSE Annotated Bibliographies The CCSSE annotated bibliography can be accessed from the “About the Survey” webpage: http://www.ccsse.org/aboutsurvey/biblio/page1.cfm

An Invitation If your college is engaged in learning communities and you are looking for ways to assess the learning that takes place in the LC, feel free to email Gillies to discuss the possibility of conducting the survey at your college: malnarig@evergreen.edu If you have questions about survey development, data collection or analysis, feel free to email Maureen: mpettitt@skagit.edu

Thank you for your interest in this work!