Measuring Disability in Population and Housing Censuses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disability Statistics in Egypt By Dr. Bothaina EL- Deeb.
Advertisements

Measuring Ethno-Cultural Characteristics in Population Censuses United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Regional Training Workshop.
Short Set Update Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant To NCHS.
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
Census survey 2008 Zohar Chessakov Welfare Statistics CBS Workshop on the Survey of People With Disabilities 9-11/03/2010.
Building a disability database to monitor the implementation of UNCRPD in your country Adele D. Furrie Council of Canadians with Disabilities CANADA
Country Report on the Pre Test to Improve Disability Measurement Statistics Sri Lanka 2009 (UNESCAP /WG supported)
GENERAL REPORT OF THE COGNITIVE TESTING MÉXICO INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA, GEOGRAFÍA E INFORMÁTICA (INEGI) Sixth meeting of the Washington Group.
Disability measurement and statistics - the state of the notion Marguerite Schneider UNECA/LCD conference on UNCRDP, May Addis Ababa Marguerite Schneider.
Field test options instrument, instructions, non-response/ refusals, and Interviewer debriefing Washington Group Regional Training Workshop Rio de Janeiro.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part I.
NCPEDP Study on Disability Question in Population Census of India 2011 Prepared by DEOC.
SPECA Regional Wrokshop on Disability Statistics, Dec 13-15, 2006 Issues Related to Disability Measurement: Cognitive testing and mode Jennifer Madans.
Sixth Meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Session 3: In-depth review of cognitive and field test results and experiences Cognition.
Measuring Disability Prevalence Daniel Mont, HDNSP Disability and Development Team June 6, 2007.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group (continued) Daniel Mont Disability and Development Group The World Bank.
Presentation on Field tests Margie Schneider Dan Mont 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala, Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Revising the United Nations Census Recommendations on Disability Margaret Mbogoni and Angela Me First meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Measurement.
1 Task Force on Health Expectancies National Disability Survey and Sport and Physical Exercise Module Gerry Brady Central Statistics Office, Ireland Luxembourg.
The DHS Program Pilot of a Household Survey Disability Module 6 OCTOBER 2015.
REPORT ON UGANDA PILOT STUDY by Ms. Pamela Kakande Senior Statistician Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb (with Kristen Miller & Meredith Massey) NCHS Washington,
… the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics, USA for the Washington Group on Disability.
The Cognitive Survey for Mauritius – test and results Presented by: Mr Chettun Kumar ARIANAICK Statistician.
MOROCCAN EXPERIENCE ON DISABILITY STATISTICS THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO HIGH COMMISSION OF PLANNING BY ZINEB EL OUAZZANI TOUAHAMI Statistician Engineer Directorate.
Meeting of the Washington Group 1 Tenth meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Welcome and opening remarks.
Class Forum: Documentary by Lucretia Massey-Mckerdy.
CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS. Definition of Communication  Webster’s dictionary defines communication as “to give, or give and receive, information, signals,
1. Communication: The sharing of a thought, an idea or a feeling. a. involves a purposeful generation and transmission of a message by one person to one.
Measuring disability in South Africa: Data gaps & challenges Population Statistics Division Statistics South Africa 7 December 2016.
Talking to our Children about Sexuality
Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG16)
UNICEF/WG MODULE ON CHILD FUNCTIONING: TESTING and ANALYSIS
Survey Project.
Interviewing Techniques
COMMUNICATION.
Interviewing Techniques
Consultation: Your Say ….
Design of interview schedules, questionnaires and checklist
Addressing Pushback from Patients
Interpersonal communication
Questionnaire administration
Independent advocacy Care Act 2014
Discussion Topics.
Select Items with High Burden
Read the quote and with the person next to you, discuss what you think it means. Do you agree? Why / why not? Be prepared to share your thoughts with the.
Introduction: There are events and times in our lives that we find difficult to deal with. In this assembly we’ll have the opportunity to think about those.
Pilots to develop a toolkit to support GP federation-based care models for Children and Young People General Practice CYP Learning Needs Assessment.
I Can Make a Ballpark Estimate
2018 Census content development Disability
Multi-Mode Data Collection Approach
Towards improved measures of disability for development indicators
Education for Wellbeing - Pupil Survey
The cognitive model in answering questions Marco Ballin
Comparing Estimates from the ACS and WG Question Sets
Peer mentor training Session 1
DISCUSSION ON MEASURING DISABILITY IN POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS
for disability data collection in Viet Nam
Care and support of people growing older with a learning disability
Training Workshop – Module 2
PRINCIPLES OF WRITING AND CLASSIFICATION OF QUESTIONS
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: International Standards and Contemporary Technologies,
Your Self Concept and Self Esteem
Department Of Commerce S.M.Joshi College Hadapsar,Pune.
Developing and using questionnaires
Caring for Clients with Dementia
Counseling.
Human Subjects Research
Special Services Disability Services
Patient satisfaction survey 2019
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Disability in Population and Housing Censuses Group One United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: International Standards and Contemporary Technologies; DARES-ES- SALAAM 29 May- 1 June, 2017 Measuring Disability in Population and Housing Censuses

1. What questions were asked on disability in the last census or will be asked if it will be taken in 2017 or 2018? Based on the last experience and plan for the 2017 and 2018 PHC, Some countries used the Questions on disability as recommended by the Washington Group on Disability, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health(ICF), Other countries added optional or country specific questions like Main causes and other categories of impairments like Cleft palate, mental health problems, .... Or didn’t ask the question on degree/level of impairment: No difficult at all, Some difficulty, a lot of difficulty, cannot do (smthg)at all. Retained are: Q 1. “Does [NAME ] has any difficulty or problems of ……”? a)Walking, b)Seeing, c) Hearing, d)Cognition, d )Self-care, e )Communication (mandatory for comparability) others categories will be optional or country specific. To each categories will be asked if “YES” or “NO” the HH member has difficulties of Walking, Seeing, Hearing…. (Multiple responses) Q2. “What is his/her level of difficulties in….(cfr Q1)? a ) No difficult at all, b)Some difficulty, c)a lot of difficulty, d) cannot do (some thing) at all The plan for 2017 and 2018 will ask questions on disability with respect to the Washington Group recommendations with or without country specific questions and categories.

Were the Questions on Disability tested Were the Questions on Disability tested? If so, what was tested and what were the results? Yes the questions on disability were tested. In some cases it is difficult to get the right translation in local language, the wording was corrected to meet country context and to get the common word that are not regarded as stigma to people/ (Ikimuga /useless, maskini in Swahili…). For example in Rwanda we don’t say Disable person or person living with disability (You live with some thing/some one you like) we say “people who have difficult of….. “ Where ambiguity was found during the test, it has been taken into consideration and the wording corrected to meet country context and to get the common word that are not regarded as negatively to people. Some times you have to ask themselves/associations on how to word the disability types that are not regarded as negatively in the common sense.

What is the experience on the use of proxy respondents to obtain data on disability about other members of the household? It is difficult to get correct answers with proxy respondents unless the respondent is some one adult or household head who knows about the disability of anyone of the HH and conscious to cooperate thus willing to give correct answers. Some of the respondents don’t like to talk about impairments of their loved ones living with disabilities that are at high level or same what they are ashamed to pronounce in public. It requires to be humble to them, cooperate, and consent to the confidentiality…

What is the experience on the translation of questions on disability into different local language in the country? It is difficulty to get the real words/very common wording that are not regarded in negatively way. Some times it is kept in both local language and English in order to be easier understood by both interviewer and respondent. Some times we refer to them/associations to know the appropriate wording that is not seen in negative sense.

If the Question(s) on disability included the use of scaled response categories, what was the experience? Are they easily translated into local language and easily understood by respondents? There is no major issue when disability question(s) on disability are of scaled response categories. Respondents are trying to give the scale categories that they feel are for the concerned persons. Disability is sensitive. The categories are easily translated into local languages even it may require to reread or reword the categories in order to get the right answer.

What is the overall experience in how the questions on disability worked in the field? Did respondents easily provide the information? Did the interviewers ask the questions as intended? Overall, there is no major issue on how disability questions worked in the field. Problems arise when respondent don’t like to cooperate or give a right answer because of social stigma it may cause or when interviewers don’t take time to pause/probe where required in order to get the correct answers.