C. Petrone and L. Walckiers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5/18/2015J-PARC1 High Level Physics Applications Magnets & Beams Day ?, Lecture ? Accelerator View from the Physicist.
Advertisements

Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
April 12, 2006 J. Garcia Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation Resistive magnet measurements & coils, manufacture.
Magnetic Behavior of LHC Correctors: Issues for Machine Operation W. Venturini Delsolaro AT-MTM; Inputs from A. Lombardi, M. Giovannozzi, S. Fartoukh,
FIDEL meeting 22/02/07 - Stephane Sanfilippo AT-MTM Status of data retrieval (SSS and S4 tested in SM18). Data retrieval : goals, agenda. Procedure of.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Options for Final Focusing Quadrupoles Michele Modena CERN TE-MSC Many thanks for the contributions of: J. Garcia Perez, H. Gerwig, C. Lopez, C. Petrone,
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
MM planning for HiLumi-LHC L. Fiscarelli M. Buzio, O. Dunkel, T. Zickler 4 March 2015.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Magnetic Metrology of SOLEIL Synchrotron S.R. Multipoles IMMW 14, A. Madur Magnetic Metrology of SOLEIL Synchrotron Storage Ring Multipoles A. Dael, P.
XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Bernward Krause MEA WP-12: Warm Magnets WPL: B. Krause.
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that.
Magnetic Field Stability Measurements Joe DiMarco 23Oct07.
Cornell ERL-FFAG Lattice Using Dejan’s doublet arc cell September 2014Stephen Brooks, FFAG’141.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
20 April 2010 “ATF2 SC Magnet Upgrade Update,” Brett Parker, BNL-SMD 1 ATF2 SC Magnet Upgrade Update Brett Parker, BNL-SMD One hour ATF2 SC FD Webex meeting.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
1 LHC Beam Energy J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department Operation group / LHC Acknowledgments: E. Todesco.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
Halbach magnets and correctors for the C and eRHIC projects
Super-FRS Lattice with Cos  multipoles
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
FFAG Recirculation and Permanent Magnet Technology for ERL’s
Alignment and beam-based correction
FFAG Magnet Requirements & Specifications
Validated magnetic data at cold
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
Preliminary Design of High Precision Small Aperture Magnets for BAPS
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Nonlinear Dynamics and Error Study of the MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Field quality of LHC corrector magnets
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
N. Tsoupas, S. Brooks, A. Jain, G. Mahler, F. Meot, V. Ptitsyn, D
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
Analysis of Chromaticity of WD-PDR4
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Alternative Ion Injector Design
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
Arc FODO Cell Inventory
Magnetic measurements at ambient temperature on the MQXFBP1
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team

Presentation transcript:

C. Petrone and L. Walckiers 16.11.2015 Magnetic measurement main results of SESAME quadrupole and sextupole magnets C. Petrone and L. Walckiers 16.11.2015 1

Magnetic Measurements Magnets measured: All 33 Sextupoles from Cyprus (SC) All 33 Quadrupole De-focusing (QD) 20 Quadrupoles Focusing (QF) (13 to be measured) 23 Sextupoles from Pakistan (SP) (10 to be measured) Magnets measurement procedure: Polarity checked (included the aux windings) De-Gauss procedure before and after the magnetic measurement cycles Pre-cycled three times from injection current to maximum current before any magnetic measurement

B2 for the quadrupoles System absolute calibrated w.r.t. SSW σ = 0.08 % QD B2 mean at 215 A : 0.0223 Tm σ = 0.04 % QF B2 mean at 250 A : 0.1038 Tm

Field angle for the quadrupoles σ = 0.09 mrad QD Angle mean at 215 A : -0.001 mrad σ = 0.187 mrad QF Angle mean at 250 A : 0.098 mrad

Magnetic axis location repeatability : 0.020 mm Magnetic axis QD and QF QD QF σ = 0.024 mm σ = 0.050 mm Mean X : 226.987 mm Mean Y : 445.005 mm σ = 0.025 mm σ = 0.050 mm Mean X : 227.021 mm Mean Y : 445.001 mm Earth magnetic field effect corrected by using measurements at negative current Magnetic axis location repeatability : 0.020 mm

QD multipoles I=215 A b6 : -0.11 ± 0.15 units b10 : -0.94 ± 0.02 units a3 : 0.14 ± 1.14 units b4 : 0.88 ± 0.92 units a4 : -1.02 ± 0.18 units b14 : 0.28 ± 0.01 units

QF multipoles I=250 A b6 : -0.06 ± 0.12 units b10 : -0.33 ± 0.02 units a3 : -0.11 ± 0.76 units b4 : -0.20 ± 0.32 units a4 : -0.18 ± 0.18 units b14 : -0.34 ± 0.01 units

B3 for the sextupoles σ = 0.09 % Cyprus B3 mean at 125 A : 0.0079 Tm σ = 0.09 % Cyprus B3 mean at 125 A : 0.0079 Tm σ = 0.06 % Pak B3 mean at 125 A : 0.0079 Tm

Field angle for the sextupoles σ = 0.15 mrad Cyprus Angle mean at 125 A : -0.1 mrad σ = 0.16 mrad PAK Angle mean at 125 A : 0.03 mrad

Magnetic axis sextupoles Cyprus Pakistan σ = 0.02 mm σ = 0.07 mm Mean X : 226.98 mm Mean Y : 444.98 mm σ = 0.03 mm σ = 0.08 mm Mean X : 226.97 mm Mean Y : 444.98 mm

Sextupoles b9 and b15 multipoles I=125 A Cyprus Pakistan b9 : 0.44 ± 0.13 units b9 : 0.78 ± 0.06 units b15 : -0.09 ± 0.01 units b15 : -0.08 ± 0.01 units

Sextupoles not allowed multipoles I=125 A Cyprus Pakistan   Units Std b4 (units) -0.50 1.45 a4 (units) -0.83 1.47 b5 (units) 0.80 0.89 a5 (units) -0.02 0.72 b6 (units) 0.03 0.49 a6 (units) 0.46 0.16 b7 (units) 0.19 a7 (units) -0.01 0.14 b8 (units) 0.00 0.06 a8 (units) 0.04   Units Std b4 (units) 0.21 1.43 a4 (units) 0.37 1.40 b5 (units) 0.97 1.15 a5 (units) 0.36 1.24 b6 (units) -0.26 0.88 a6 (units) 0.48 0.14 b7 (units) 0.18 0.27 a7 (units) -0.05 0.25 b8 (units) 0.00 0.04 a8 (units) -0.01 0.06

Frequency response of correctors