Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: Concept of the inductively coupled transducer system

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: A schematic view of the experimental apparatus

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The comparison of the dechirped signals in 20 mm thickness measurement: (a) conventional ultrasonic sensor and (b) ICTS (coil separation: 35 mm)

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The thickness measurement performance of the ICTS

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: Effect of the coil separation on SNR

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The comparison of the dechirped signals with/without the insulator: (a) without the insulator and (b) with the insulator of 50 mm thickness

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: SNRs with the different insulator thicknesses

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The measured thickness with the different insulator thicknesses

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The comparison of the dechirped signals in the thickness measurement of the stainless steel plate: (a) conventional ultrasonic sensor and (b) ICTS (coil separation: 35 mm)

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The comparison of the dechirped signals with/without the irradiation

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The comparison of the signal peaks with/without the irradiation

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: A schematic view of the wastage defect test

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The results of the wastage defect inspection by the ICTS

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: The displacement distribution of the simulation result at 5 × 10−6 s

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Feasibility Study of Noncontact Ultrasonic Sensor for Nuclear Power Plant Inspection ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. 2017;3(2):021003-021003-9. doi:10.1115/1.4035466 Figure Legend: Simulation results showing the effect of the transducer diameter on wastage defect inspection